Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

P–392 Clinical outcomes of endometrium receptivity analysis(ERA) testing in patients with repeated IVF failures

View through CrossRef
Abstract Study question Is ERA testing different between RIF patients with control group? Summary answer In RIF patients, there were more chances of non-receptive endometrium. ERA testing may be helpful for the patients with repeated IVF failure. What is known already: The endometrium receptivity analysis testing might have the ability to detect the implantation window. In repeat implantation failure patients, detecting of precisely implantation window may have some benefits. Study design, size, duration This was a single-center retrospective observational study. Two hundred and forty-nine patients who underwent ERA testing following frozen-thawed embryo transfer in our center were including in this study between January 2019 and May 2020. Participants/materials, setting, methods 181 patients having unexplained repeated IVF failure (RIF group, at least tow implantation failure) and 68 patients having no experience with embryo transfer (Control group) who underwent ERA testing were including in this study. Both of Patients having a receptive (R) ERA and having a non-receptive (NR) ERA underwent a personalized embryo transfer (pET) on ERA. ERA results and clinical outcomes compared between RIF group and control group were analyzed by Chi-square test. Main results and the role of chance The proportion of R/NR results were 33:35 for the RIF group and 118:63 for the Control group, demonstrating the displacement of the window of implantation in patients with RIF. Our results revealed an endometrial factor in 51% RIF patients, which was significantly greater than the Control group 34.8% (P = 0.02). Among the patients with NR ERA result, there are not significantly difference in clinical pregnancy rate in the RIF group compared with control group (57.1%. vs. 61.9%). The clinical pregnancy rate of the patients with receptive ERA result also is comparable in both group (70.3% vs. 66.7%). Limitations, reasons for caution This is a retrospective, single center study with limited case number. There were may some bias with ERA testing errors. Wider implications of the findings: In RIF patients, there were more chances of non-receptive endometrium. ERA testing may be helpful for the patients with repeated IVF failure. Larger randomized studies are required to validate these results. Trial registration number 18MMHISO70e
Title: P–392 Clinical outcomes of endometrium receptivity analysis(ERA) testing in patients with repeated IVF failures
Description:
Abstract Study question Is ERA testing different between RIF patients with control group? Summary answer In RIF patients, there were more chances of non-receptive endometrium.
ERA testing may be helpful for the patients with repeated IVF failure.
What is known already: The endometrium receptivity analysis testing might have the ability to detect the implantation window.
In repeat implantation failure patients, detecting of precisely implantation window may have some benefits.
Study design, size, duration This was a single-center retrospective observational study.
Two hundred and forty-nine patients who underwent ERA testing following frozen-thawed embryo transfer in our center were including in this study between January 2019 and May 2020.
Participants/materials, setting, methods 181 patients having unexplained repeated IVF failure (RIF group, at least tow implantation failure) and 68 patients having no experience with embryo transfer (Control group) who underwent ERA testing were including in this study.
Both of Patients having a receptive (R) ERA and having a non-receptive (NR) ERA underwent a personalized embryo transfer (pET) on ERA.
ERA results and clinical outcomes compared between RIF group and control group were analyzed by Chi-square test.
Main results and the role of chance The proportion of R/NR results were 33:35 for the RIF group and 118:63 for the Control group, demonstrating the displacement of the window of implantation in patients with RIF.
Our results revealed an endometrial factor in 51% RIF patients, which was significantly greater than the Control group 34.
8% (P = 0.
02).
Among the patients with NR ERA result, there are not significantly difference in clinical pregnancy rate in the RIF group compared with control group (57.
1%.
vs.
61.
9%).
The clinical pregnancy rate of the patients with receptive ERA result also is comparable in both group (70.
3% vs.
66.
7%).
Limitations, reasons for caution This is a retrospective, single center study with limited case number.
There were may some bias with ERA testing errors.
Wider implications of the findings: In RIF patients, there were more chances of non-receptive endometrium.
ERA testing may be helpful for the patients with repeated IVF failure.
Larger randomized studies are required to validate these results.
Trial registration number 18MMHISO70e.

Related Results

A pilot and ex-vivo study of examination of endometrium tissue by catheter based optical coherence tomography
A pilot and ex-vivo study of examination of endometrium tissue by catheter based optical coherence tomography
Abstract Objective This study aimed to distinguish ex-vivo normal and abnormal endometrium tissue samples histologically by catheter based optical c...
Individual Differences in Receptivity to Scientific Bullshit
Individual Differences in Receptivity to Scientific Bullshit
Pseudo profound bullshit receptivity is the tendency to perceive meaning in important-sounding, nonsense statements. To understand how bullshit receptivity differs across domains, ...
IVF-induced pregnancy and early motherhood among women with a history of severe eating disorders
IVF-induced pregnancy and early motherhood among women with a history of severe eating disorders
BackgroundThere is a higher prevalence of eating disorders among women seeking in vitro fertilization (IVF). Women with a history of eating disorders may be particularly vulnerable...
Effect and mechanism of Jinfeng Pills on the receptivity of thin endometrium in rats
Effect and mechanism of Jinfeng Pills on the receptivity of thin endometrium in rats
Objective: This study aimed to investigate the impact of Jinfeng Pills on the receptivity of a thin endometrium in rats and elucidate its mechanism of action. ...

Back to Top