Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Negative predictive value of fecal immunochemical testing in significant bowel disease screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis

View through CrossRef
Objectives: General practitioners (GPs) must assess significant bowel disease (SBD) in patients with lower bowel symptoms during primary care. Studies have evaluated the efficacy of fecal immunochemical testing (FIT) for SBD screening. However, the effectiveness of FIT remains controversial. This study aimed to investigate the value of FIT in SBD screening. Methods: PubMed, the Cochrane Database, and EMBASE were systematically searched. Studies that estimated FIT values in screening for SBD among patients with lower bowel symptoms were included. Sensitivity, specificity, negative likelihood ratio (NLR), positive likelihood ratio (PLR), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated. Additionally, the pooled area under the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve was analyzed. Results: A total of 8615 patients with lower bowel symptoms who underwent FIT and colonoscopy to screen for SBD were enrolled and assessed in this meta-analysis; of these, 1226 patients were ultimately diagnosed with SBD. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, PLR, NLR, DOR, and NPV of FIT in SBD screening were 0.65 (95% CI: 0.50–0.78), 0.85 (95% CI: 0.72–0.92), 4.2 (95% CI: 2.60–6.90), 0.41 (95% CI: 0.29–0.58), 10 (95% CI: 6–17), and 0.90 (95% CI: 0.87–0.94), respectively. Besides, the pooled SROC was 0.82 (95% CI: 0.78–0.85). Conclusions: This study indicates that the FIT provides a favorable NPV for SBD screening and could be a valuable technique for GPs to rule out SBD in primary care. At the same time, GPs need to remain vigilant and refer patients to gastroenterologists when necessary.
Title: Negative predictive value of fecal immunochemical testing in significant bowel disease screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Description:
Objectives: General practitioners (GPs) must assess significant bowel disease (SBD) in patients with lower bowel symptoms during primary care.
Studies have evaluated the efficacy of fecal immunochemical testing (FIT) for SBD screening.
However, the effectiveness of FIT remains controversial.
This study aimed to investigate the value of FIT in SBD screening.
Methods: PubMed, the Cochrane Database, and EMBASE were systematically searched.
Studies that estimated FIT values in screening for SBD among patients with lower bowel symptoms were included.
Sensitivity, specificity, negative likelihood ratio (NLR), positive likelihood ratio (PLR), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated.
Additionally, the pooled area under the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve was analyzed.
Results: A total of 8615 patients with lower bowel symptoms who underwent FIT and colonoscopy to screen for SBD were enrolled and assessed in this meta-analysis; of these, 1226 patients were ultimately diagnosed with SBD.
The pooled sensitivity, specificity, PLR, NLR, DOR, and NPV of FIT in SBD screening were 0.
65 (95% CI: 0.
50–0.
78), 0.
85 (95% CI: 0.
72–0.
92), 4.
2 (95% CI: 2.
60–6.
90), 0.
41 (95% CI: 0.
29–0.
58), 10 (95% CI: 6–17), and 0.
90 (95% CI: 0.
87–0.
94), respectively.
Besides, the pooled SROC was 0.
82 (95% CI: 0.
78–0.
85).
Conclusions: This study indicates that the FIT provides a favorable NPV for SBD screening and could be a valuable technique for GPs to rule out SBD in primary care.
At the same time, GPs need to remain vigilant and refer patients to gastroenterologists when necessary.

Related Results

Predictors of False-Negative Axillary FNA Among Breast Cancer Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study
Predictors of False-Negative Axillary FNA Among Breast Cancer Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study
Abstract Introduction Fine-needle aspiration (FNA) is commonly used to investigate lymphadenopathy of suspected metastatic origin. The current study aims to find the association be...
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Abstract The Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans (Guidelines) advises older adults to be as active as possible. Yet, despite the well documented benefits of physical activi...
Hydatid Disease of The Brain Parenchyma: A Systematic Review
Hydatid Disease of The Brain Parenchyma: A Systematic Review
Abstarct Introduction Isolated brain hydatid disease (BHD) is an extremely rare form of echinococcosis. A prompt and timely diagnosis is a crucial step in disease management. This ...
Small Cell Lung Cancer and Tarlatamab: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials
Small Cell Lung Cancer and Tarlatamab: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials
Abstract Introduction Tarlatamab is a Delta-like ligand 3 (DLL3) -directed bispecific T-cell engager recently approved for use in patients with advanced small cell lung cancer (SCL...
P017 Fecal wash host transcriptomics identifies inflammation throughout the colon and terminal ileum
P017 Fecal wash host transcriptomics identifies inflammation throughout the colon and terminal ileum
Abstract Background Non-invasive modalities for assessing active endoscopic and histological inflammation in Crohn’s disease and...
Safety and Efficacy of Atezolizumab in Ovarian Cancer
Safety and Efficacy of Atezolizumab in Ovarian Cancer
Abstract Introduction Although the efficacy of PD-L1 blockade has been evaluated in analyses that combine pharmacologically distinct antibodies, the specific efficacy and safety of...

Back to Top