Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Comparing Contact Stress Estimates of Some Straight Bevel Gears With ISO 10300 Standards

View through CrossRef
The pitting resistance of straight bevel gears, like other gears, is commonly assessed on the basis of the contact stress in a gear mesh. A new contact stress model for straight bevel gears is used to estimate the contact stress in some gearset designs and compared with predictions from ISO 10300 bevel gear standards. In the cases considered, the new model contact stresses defer from the ISO values in the range of 13% to 33%, with the ISO predictions generally on the higher side. These deviations appear to be somewhat high but not unreasonable because of obvious differences in the two models. The ISO standard uses the mid facewidth cone radius in its contact stress model while the new model uses the cone backend radius which is larger than the mid facewidth cone radius. Another contributing factor is that the load service factor values evaluated from ISO methods are generally higher than those of the new model values, based largely on American Gear Manufacturers Association (AGMA) methods. It should be noted that the power ratings for all the design cases studied are below 10 kW.
Title: Comparing Contact Stress Estimates of Some Straight Bevel Gears With ISO 10300 Standards
Description:
The pitting resistance of straight bevel gears, like other gears, is commonly assessed on the basis of the contact stress in a gear mesh.
A new contact stress model for straight bevel gears is used to estimate the contact stress in some gearset designs and compared with predictions from ISO 10300 bevel gear standards.
In the cases considered, the new model contact stresses defer from the ISO values in the range of 13% to 33%, with the ISO predictions generally on the higher side.
These deviations appear to be somewhat high but not unreasonable because of obvious differences in the two models.
The ISO standard uses the mid facewidth cone radius in its contact stress model while the new model uses the cone backend radius which is larger than the mid facewidth cone radius.
Another contributing factor is that the load service factor values evaluated from ISO methods are generally higher than those of the new model values, based largely on American Gear Manufacturers Association (AGMA) methods.
It should be noted that the power ratings for all the design cases studied are below 10 kW.

Related Results

Esthetic blending
Esthetic blending
<p>The purpose of this study was to determine which type of bevel in a class IV dental composite restoration is the most esthetic and has the best blend to natural tooth stru...
Simulation of Accessory Drives Bevel Gears Dynamic Conditions
Simulation of Accessory Drives Bevel Gears Dynamic Conditions
Bevel gears of modern aviation motors operate at high rotation velocities and transmitted torques. High dynamic load in bevel mesh due to impact interaction of teeth in contact act...
A Research on Bevel Gear Hobbing
A Research on Bevel Gear Hobbing
Abstract At present, hob cutters have mainly been used for the tooth cutting of gears. The each blades of the hob cutter have generally been designed with the same m...
Comparison of Contact Fatigue Strength of Carbon Case Hardening and Laser Hardening of Gears
Comparison of Contact Fatigue Strength of Carbon Case Hardening and Laser Hardening of Gears
Carbon case hardening of gears is a widely used surface treatment in the manufacturing industry. However, an evident shortcoming is that gear distortion after carbon case hardening...
Standardization in Health and Medical Informatics
Standardization in Health and Medical Informatics
When things go well then often it is because they conform to standards (ISO, 2005). According to the Oxford Dictionary of Modern English, there is a lot of explanation of what stan...
API Offshore Structures Standards: Changing Times
API Offshore Structures Standards: Changing Times
Abstract Two instrumental series of events in the past several years have provided the impetus for API Subcommittee 2 (SC 2) to action a new strategy for the API ...
The Feasibility of National Inference Under the NSCAW IV L-State Sample Design
The Feasibility of National Inference Under the NSCAW IV L-State Sample Design
The purpose of this Feasibility Analysis Study (FAS) was to evaluate methods for producing valid national estimates under the National Survey of Child and Adolescent Well-being (NS...
Revised Lewis Bending Stress Capacity Model
Revised Lewis Bending Stress Capacity Model
Background: During operation, cylindrical gearset experiences tangential, radial, and axial (helical gears only) force components that induce bending, compressive, and sh...

Back to Top