Javascript must be enabled to continue!
New Gleason grade groups; epidemiologic data from Isfahan, Iran based on the new classification
View through CrossRef
Introduction: A new five-tier Gleason grade grouping (GGG) has recently been proposed and approved by the World Health Organization. In this new classification, GGG 1 (Gleason score ≤6), GGG 2 (Gleason score 3+4=7), GGG 3 (Gleason score 4+3=7), GGG 4 (Gleason score 8) and GGG 5 (Gleason score 9-10) are the new grade groups based on the Gleason score. Objectives: We examined the epidemiologic data of prostate cancer based on the new Gleason system in Isfahan, Iran. International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) proposed the new Gleason grade groups in order to make accurate prognostic classification for prostate cancer. Patients and Methods: Around 305 prostate cancer cases which diagnosed by biopsy admitted to Khorshid university hospital and Ordibehesht surgical center were included (from 2014 to 2016). Pathological examination of the samples was conducted by pathologists with genitourinary expertise. Results: Among 305 biopsy specimens, 28.6% of cases had a Gleason score less than 6, 23.7% Gleason score 3+4=7, 10.9% Gleason score 4+3=7, only 0.7% Gleason score 4+4=8 and 36.1% Gleason score 9 and 10. Conclusion: The new Gleason grade groups provide a simplified, user-friendly and clear classification system for predicting prognosis and disease progression before and after treatment.
Maad Rayan Publishing Company
Title: New Gleason grade groups; epidemiologic data from Isfahan, Iran based on the new classification
Description:
Introduction: A new five-tier Gleason grade grouping (GGG) has recently been proposed and approved by the World Health Organization.
In this new classification, GGG 1 (Gleason score ≤6), GGG 2 (Gleason score 3+4=7), GGG 3 (Gleason score 4+3=7), GGG 4 (Gleason score 8) and GGG 5 (Gleason score 9-10) are the new grade groups based on the Gleason score.
Objectives: We examined the epidemiologic data of prostate cancer based on the new Gleason system in Isfahan, Iran.
International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) proposed the new Gleason grade groups in order to make accurate prognostic classification for prostate cancer.
Patients and Methods: Around 305 prostate cancer cases which diagnosed by biopsy admitted to Khorshid university hospital and Ordibehesht surgical center were included (from 2014 to 2016).
Pathological examination of the samples was conducted by pathologists with genitourinary expertise.
Results: Among 305 biopsy specimens, 28.
6% of cases had a Gleason score less than 6, 23.
7% Gleason score 3+4=7, 10.
9% Gleason score 4+3=7, only 0.
7% Gleason score 4+4=8 and 36.
1% Gleason score 9 and 10.
Conclusion: The new Gleason grade groups provide a simplified, user-friendly and clear classification system for predicting prognosis and disease progression before and after treatment.
Related Results
Abstract 3741: Improving Gleason scoring in prostate cancer: Development and clinical value of the Molecular Integrative Quantitative Gleason (MIQ-Gleason)
Abstract 3741: Improving Gleason scoring in prostate cancer: Development and clinical value of the Molecular Integrative Quantitative Gleason (MIQ-Gleason)
Abstract
We have recently shown that quantification of Gleason 4 patterns (Q-Gleason) provides strong prognostic information beyond traditional Gleason grade groups ...
Safety and Efficacy of Atezolizumab in Ovarian Cancer
Safety and Efficacy of Atezolizumab in Ovarian Cancer
Abstract
Introduction
Although the efficacy of PD-L1 blockade has been evaluated in analyses that combine pharmacologically distinct antibodies, the specific efficacy and safety of...
Quantification of the individual risk of each Gleason pattern, including tertiary Gleason pattern 5, after radical prostatectomy: development of the modified Gleason grade grouping (mGGG) model
Quantification of the individual risk of each Gleason pattern, including tertiary Gleason pattern 5, after radical prostatectomy: development of the modified Gleason grade grouping (mGGG) model
Abstract
Background
While the new Gleason grade grouping (GGG), which started in 2016, has been widely validated in prostate cancer, it does not incorporate the concept of tertiary...
Broadening the criteria for avoiding staging bone scans in prostate cancer: a retrospective study of patients at the Royal Marsden Hospital
Broadening the criteria for avoiding staging bone scans in prostate cancer: a retrospective study of patients at the Royal Marsden Hospital
OBJECTIVE
To determine if it is possible to exclude staging bone scans in a greater proportion of patients if more consideration is given to T stage and Gleason...
Gleason Score Discrepancies Between Needle Biopsies and Radical Prostatectomy Specimens in an African Men: Clinical Implication
Gleason Score Discrepancies Between Needle Biopsies and Radical Prostatectomy Specimens in an African Men: Clinical Implication
Objective:Gleason scores, as determined by 18-gauge core needle biopsies (NB), were compared with both Gleason scores and the pathological staging of corresponding radical prostat...
Reported Concerns and Issues of Residence Hall Students
Reported Concerns and Issues of Residence Hall Students
The purpose of the researcher was to investigate concerns and issues of residence hall students. The sample consisted of 320 resident students. The independent variables investigat...
Hydatid Disease of The Brain Parenchyma: A Systematic Review
Hydatid Disease of The Brain Parenchyma: A Systematic Review
Abstarct
Introduction
Isolated brain hydatid disease (BHD) is an extremely rare form of echinococcosis. A prompt and timely diagnosis is a crucial step in disease management. This ...
Abstract 4518: Prevalence of high-grade prostatic adenocarcinoma in a black African population
Abstract 4518: Prevalence of high-grade prostatic adenocarcinoma in a black African population
Abstract
INTRODUCTION:
Prostate cancer is the second most common type of cancer in men worldwide. Despite this, screening is currently disputed becaus...

