Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Effect of Ceramic and Dentin Thicknesses and Type of Resin-Based Luting Agents on Intrapulpal Temperature Changes during Luting of Ceramic Inlays

View through CrossRef
The adhesive cementation of ceramic inlays may increase pulpal temperature (PT) and induce pulpal damage due to heat generated by the curing unit and the exothermic reaction of the luting agent (LA). The aim was to measure the PT rise during ceramic inlay cementation by testing different combinations of dentin and ceramic thicknesses and LAs. The PT changes were detected using a thermocouple sensor positioned in the pulp chamber of a mandibular molar. Gradual occlusal reduction obtained dentin thicknesses of 2.5, 2.0, 1.5, and 1.0 mm. Light-cured (LC) and dual-cured (DC) adhesive cements and preheated restorative resin-based composite (RBC) were applied to luting of 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, and 3.5 mm lithium disilicate ceramic blocks. Differential scanning calorimetry was used to compare the thermal conductivity of dentin and ceramic slices. Although ceramic reduced heat delivered by the curing unit, the exothermic reaction of the LAs significantly increased it in each investigated combination (5.4–7.9 °C). Temperature changes were predominantly influenced by dentin thickness followed by LA and ceramic thickness. Thermal conductivity of dentin was 24% lower than that of ceramic, and its thermal capacity was 86% higher. Regardless of the ceramic thickness, adhesive inlay cementation can significantly increase the PT, especially when the remaining dentin thickness is <2 mm.
Title: Effect of Ceramic and Dentin Thicknesses and Type of Resin-Based Luting Agents on Intrapulpal Temperature Changes during Luting of Ceramic Inlays
Description:
The adhesive cementation of ceramic inlays may increase pulpal temperature (PT) and induce pulpal damage due to heat generated by the curing unit and the exothermic reaction of the luting agent (LA).
The aim was to measure the PT rise during ceramic inlay cementation by testing different combinations of dentin and ceramic thicknesses and LAs.
The PT changes were detected using a thermocouple sensor positioned in the pulp chamber of a mandibular molar.
Gradual occlusal reduction obtained dentin thicknesses of 2.
5, 2.
0, 1.
5, and 1.
0 mm.
Light-cured (LC) and dual-cured (DC) adhesive cements and preheated restorative resin-based composite (RBC) were applied to luting of 2.
0, 2.
5, 3.
0, and 3.
5 mm lithium disilicate ceramic blocks.
Differential scanning calorimetry was used to compare the thermal conductivity of dentin and ceramic slices.
Although ceramic reduced heat delivered by the curing unit, the exothermic reaction of the LAs significantly increased it in each investigated combination (5.
4–7.
9 °C).
Temperature changes were predominantly influenced by dentin thickness followed by LA and ceramic thickness.
Thermal conductivity of dentin was 24% lower than that of ceramic, and its thermal capacity was 86% higher.
Regardless of the ceramic thickness, adhesive inlay cementation can significantly increase the PT, especially when the remaining dentin thickness is <2 mm.

Related Results

Evaluation of Four Different Adhesive Systems’ Bonding Strength Between Superficial and Deep Dentin
Evaluation of Four Different Adhesive Systems’ Bonding Strength Between Superficial and Deep Dentin
The success of adhesive restorations largely depends on the optimal bond strength between the tooth structure and the restorative material. The aim of this study was to evaluate th...
Resin Luting Materials
Resin Luting Materials
Luting materials are a central component of indirect dentistry, with the most recently introduced types being resin-based materials. These may be classified into conventional resin...
Effect of Different Disinfection Protocols on The Resin Bond Strength to Dentin: In Vitro Study.
Effect of Different Disinfection Protocols on The Resin Bond Strength to Dentin: In Vitro Study.
Abstract Antimicrobial photodynamic therapy (aPDT) can be adopted as a modality for bacterial decontamination before cavity restoration to decrease the risk of secondary ca...
The influence of fatigue load to various adhesive resin luting agents in a zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate ceramic bonded to dentin
The influence of fatigue load to various adhesive resin luting agents in a zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate ceramic bonded to dentin
Purpose. To examine fatigue failure load value of etch-and-rinse and self-adhesive luting systems used to bond ZLS to dentin. Moreover, this study seeks to evaluate whether the app...
Effect of substrate and adhesive system type on composite resin restorations
Effect of substrate and adhesive system type on composite resin restorations
Although it is possible to obtain a reliable bond between enamel and composite resin, the ideal bonding method of composite resin to dentin still needs to be developed. Variables s...
Influence of luting strategies on dentin bond performance of self-adhesive resin luting cement combined with a universal adhesive
Influence of luting strategies on dentin bond performance of self-adhesive resin luting cement combined with a universal adhesive
Abstract Objectives This study aimed to evaluate the dentin bond performance of various resin luting cement (RLC) systems combined with universal adhesives in different lut...
Bonding of Restorative Materials to Dentin With Various Luting Agents
Bonding of Restorative Materials to Dentin With Various Luting Agents
SUMMARY The aim was to compare eight types of luting agents when used to bond six indirect, laboratory restorative materials to dentin. Cylinders of the six restorat...
Adhesion of Resin-Resin and Resin–Lithium Disilicate Ceramic: A Methodological Assessment
Adhesion of Resin-Resin and Resin–Lithium Disilicate Ceramic: A Methodological Assessment
The aim of this study was to evaluate four test methods on the adhesion of resin composite to resin composite, and resin composite to glass ceramic. Resin composite specimens (N = ...

Back to Top