Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Kuts H. M., Kuts Yu. O. Ukrainian political identity vs russian political identity: demarcation lines
View through CrossRef
The article is devoted to identifying the key demarcation lines between Ukrainian and Russian political identities. Particular attention is paid to the importance of conceptual demarcation between the notions of Ukrainian and Russian political identities in the context of Russia’s armed aggression against Ukraine. Political identities, like various forms of collective identities, are acquired phenomena. They undergo changes over a long period of time. It is noted that effective strategies for constructing political identities determine the formation of new traditions. A comparison of the phenomena of Ukrainian political identity and Russian political identity is carried out, in particular in a historical context. The main differences between the Ukrainian and Russian types of political identities are identified. It is argued that the categories of individualism, freedom, and rejection of authoritarian principles are key to Ukrainian political identity. For carriers of Russian political identity, the category of freedom does not hold significant value. On the contrary, servile obedience has long been considered a virtue within Muscovite society. Carriers of Ukrainian political identity adopt a critical attitude toward representatives of power. Accordingly, one should not expect automatic submission to authority from Ukrainians. For citizens of Ukraine, the authority and legitimacy of the head of power are important. For carriers of Russian political identity, the need for a supreme leader is essential. It is this leader who is expected to make all important decisions independently, while the population is required to execute them. This state of Russian political culture is determined by long-standing practices of authoritarianism. It is stated that one of the dominant features of Russian political identity is atomization, that is, the fragmentation of society. Such a situation makes the formation of large-scale protest actions in Russia impossible, since people are unable to trust one another. Carriers of Ukrainian political identity are characterized by the ability for cooperation and self-organization, which is formed in societies with a high level of social capital, where there is significant trust among people.
V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University
Title: Kuts H. M., Kuts Yu. O. Ukrainian political identity vs russian political identity: demarcation lines
Description:
The article is devoted to identifying the key demarcation lines between Ukrainian and Russian political identities.
Particular attention is paid to the importance of conceptual demarcation between the notions of Ukrainian and Russian political identities in the context of Russia’s armed aggression against Ukraine.
Political identities, like various forms of collective identities, are acquired phenomena.
They undergo changes over a long period of time.
It is noted that effective strategies for constructing political identities determine the formation of new traditions.
A comparison of the phenomena of Ukrainian political identity and Russian political identity is carried out, in particular in a historical context.
The main differences between the Ukrainian and Russian types of political identities are identified.
It is argued that the categories of individualism, freedom, and rejection of authoritarian principles are key to Ukrainian political identity.
For carriers of Russian political identity, the category of freedom does not hold significant value.
On the contrary, servile obedience has long been considered a virtue within Muscovite society.
Carriers of Ukrainian political identity adopt a critical attitude toward representatives of power.
Accordingly, one should not expect automatic submission to authority from Ukrainians.
For citizens of Ukraine, the authority and legitimacy of the head of power are important.
For carriers of Russian political identity, the need for a supreme leader is essential.
It is this leader who is expected to make all important decisions independently, while the population is required to execute them.
This state of Russian political culture is determined by long-standing practices of authoritarianism.
It is stated that one of the dominant features of Russian political identity is atomization, that is, the fragmentation of society.
Such a situation makes the formation of large-scale protest actions in Russia impossible, since people are unable to trust one another.
Carriers of Ukrainian political identity are characterized by the ability for cooperation and self-organization, which is formed in societies with a high level of social capital, where there is significant trust among people.
Related Results
Ukrainian Heritage Discourse of Russian Identity Defeat
Ukrainian Heritage Discourse of Russian Identity Defeat
This article is devoted to the urgent problem of Ukrainian culturology: how to be useful in the struggle against Russian aggression. Some scientists do not believe in the special w...
SPECIFIC TRAITS OF HUNGARIAN-UKRAINIAN POETRY TRANSLATION (BASED ON YURII SHKROBYNETS’ TRANSLATIONS)
SPECIFIC TRAITS OF HUNGARIAN-UKRAINIAN POETRY TRANSLATION (BASED ON YURII SHKROBYNETS’ TRANSLATIONS)
The article addresses matters related to the peculiarities of Hungarian-Ukrainian poetic translation. It was noted that the quality, complexity and overall mastery of literary tran...
History at Ukrainian Underground University (1921–1925)
History at Ukrainian Underground University (1921–1925)
The article considers and analyzes the origin and the activity of Ukrainian Secret University (USU) in Lviv through 1919–1925 and presents its significance for the development of U...
UKRAINIANIZATION OF THE LITURGICAL LIFE IN 1917–1918
UKRAINIANIZATION OF THE LITURGICAL LIFE IN 1917–1918
Socio-political transformations caused by the Ukrainian revolution of 1917–1921, made not only political issues relevant but also cultural and even ideological. In the struggle for...
Anthropogenic legacies shaping the present composition of demarcation trees in a temperate upland field landscape in Japan
Anthropogenic legacies shaping the present composition of demarcation trees in a temperate upland field landscape in Japan
Abstract
Background
Isolated trees are often planted in agricultural landscapes around the world, but their planting background often remains unclea...
Serhii Tymoshenko: Ukrainian Architect and Diplomat
Serhii Tymoshenko: Ukrainian Architect and Diplomat
This research is focused on the life and legacy of Serhii Tymoshenko (1881–1950), Ukrainian political emigrant, political activist, statesman, and a member of the Ukrainian nationa...
SOCIOCULTURAL IDENTITY POSTMODERN: PROBLEM OF SOCIAL CONSTRUCTION
SOCIOCULTURAL IDENTITY POSTMODERN: PROBLEM OF SOCIAL CONSTRUCTION
Problem setting. The relevance of our study is due to the excessive popularity of the concept of «socio-cultural identity» as a scientific term and tool for studying the postmodern...
Vocabulary of Ukrainian letters of the 14th Century in the “Dictionary of the Old Russian Language (11th–14th Centuries)”
Vocabulary of Ukrainian letters of the 14th Century in the “Dictionary of the Old Russian Language (11th–14th Centuries)”
The article examines the vocabulary of fourteenth-century Ukrainian charters that were incorporated into the source base of the Dictionary of the Old East Slavic Language of the 11...

