Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Classification of Obesity and Assessment of Obesity‐Related Health Risks
View through CrossRef
AbstractThe barriers to the evaluation and treatment of obesity by health‐care providers include a lack of awareness of obesity as an independent risk factor for morbidity and mortality and inadequate training in the medical management of obesity. However, the increased risk of medical disorders and emotional consequences associated with obesity make the disorder a priority for physicians to assess and treat. Obesity researchers have published and promoted the use of evidence‐based, practical guidelines to educate physicians about how best to approach obesity as a medical disorder. The guidelines support classification and assessment of obesity as an important component of the patient's medical care. Assessment begins with classification by body mass index (BMI), with overweight and obesity defined as a BMI of 25 and 30 kg/m2, respectively. Patients with high‐risk combinations of BMI, waist circumference, and specific cardiovascular risk factors should begin a weight‐loss program if no contraindications are present. Proper assessment also includes evaluation of complicating factors for obesity, such as sleep apnea and type 2 diabetes, psychosocial factors, and the use of medications that may contribute to obesity. Special attention should be paid to elements of the physical examination that often are performed incorrectly in obese patients, such as pelvic exams. Gathering this information will allow the clinician to tailor a weight‐loss program to each patient individually. Although this represents the most challenging component of obesity care, resources are available to guide the clinician.
Title: Classification of Obesity and Assessment of Obesity‐Related Health Risks
Description:
AbstractThe barriers to the evaluation and treatment of obesity by health‐care providers include a lack of awareness of obesity as an independent risk factor for morbidity and mortality and inadequate training in the medical management of obesity.
However, the increased risk of medical disorders and emotional consequences associated with obesity make the disorder a priority for physicians to assess and treat.
Obesity researchers have published and promoted the use of evidence‐based, practical guidelines to educate physicians about how best to approach obesity as a medical disorder.
The guidelines support classification and assessment of obesity as an important component of the patient's medical care.
Assessment begins with classification by body mass index (BMI), with overweight and obesity defined as a BMI of 25 and 30 kg/m2, respectively.
Patients with high‐risk combinations of BMI, waist circumference, and specific cardiovascular risk factors should begin a weight‐loss program if no contraindications are present.
Proper assessment also includes evaluation of complicating factors for obesity, such as sleep apnea and type 2 diabetes, psychosocial factors, and the use of medications that may contribute to obesity.
Special attention should be paid to elements of the physical examination that often are performed incorrectly in obese patients, such as pelvic exams.
Gathering this information will allow the clinician to tailor a weight‐loss program to each patient individually.
Although this represents the most challenging component of obesity care, resources are available to guide the clinician.
Related Results
Eating Habits Associated with Overweight and Obesity: Case - Control Study in 11-14 year old Adolescents in Hanoi in 2020
Eating Habits Associated with Overweight and Obesity: Case - Control Study in 11-14 year old Adolescents in Hanoi in 2020
Eating habits appears to be an important determinant of dietary intake and may consequently influence overweight and obesity. Understanding the relationship between the nutritional...
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The UP Manila Health Policy Development Hub recognizes the invaluable contribution of the participants in theseries of roundtable discussions listed below:
RTD: Beyond Hospit...
Obesity Risk Assessment Concept
Obesity Risk Assessment Concept
The obesity risk assessment concept is developed after considering the increased risk of obesity and the concomitant conditions arising due to obesity. The treatment of obesity is ...
Microevolutionary Hypothesis of the Obesity Epidemic
Microevolutionary Hypothesis of the Obesity Epidemic
AbstractThe obesity epidemic represents potentially the largest phenotypic change inHomo sapienssince the origin of the species. Despite obesity’s high heritability, a change in th...
Double Burden of Nutrition and some Eating Habits Characteristics of Preschool Children in Nam Hong Commune, Dong Anh district, Hanoi, 2018
Double Burden of Nutrition and some Eating Habits Characteristics of Preschool Children in Nam Hong Commune, Dong Anh district, Hanoi, 2018
Abstract: The study aims to provide evidence of double nutritional burden (including malnutrition and overweight/obesity) as well as the impact of eating habits on nutritional stat...
Comprehensive Obesity Education for Family Medicine Residents
Comprehensive Obesity Education for Family Medicine Residents
Background: Family medicine residents receive limited education on obesity management and obesity bias. Weight stigmatization is prevalent in primary care providers and trainees, a...
FINANCIAL RISKS OF BROKER’S ACTIVITY
FINANCIAL RISKS OF BROKER’S ACTIVITY
Changes in the Ukrainian economy and the development of the financial market are of interest in solving the problems associated with brokerage activities. These issues are of parti...
Do Obesity Classifications Create the Obesity Paradox? A Scoping Review of Obesity Definitions Applied in Sepsis Research
Do Obesity Classifications Create the Obesity Paradox? A Scoping Review of Obesity Definitions Applied in Sepsis Research
ABSTRACTObesity appears to be associated with improved health outcomes in patients with sepsis, a phenomenon termed the obesity paradox. However, the potential influence of varying...

