Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Jury Instructions on Expert Testimony

View through CrossRef
Abstract Jury instructions are a fundamental part of the justice system, providing jurors with guidance on the legal concepts necessary to resolving a case. Although expert testimony is frequently an important portion of the evidence in a case, pattern jury instructions rarely provide more than minimal guidance on the issue of expert testimony. Few jurisdictions instruct jurors on the factors to be considered in properly determining the value of the expert testimony, with the majority of jurisdictions emphasizing that expert testimony should be evaluated in the same manner as lay witness testimony. Consistent with existing professional standards and legal commentary, judges and lawyers should develop more informative instructions that provide jurors with specific factors that affect the reliability and value of the expert opinion testimony.
Title: Jury Instructions on Expert Testimony
Description:
Abstract Jury instructions are a fundamental part of the justice system, providing jurors with guidance on the legal concepts necessary to resolving a case.
Although expert testimony is frequently an important portion of the evidence in a case, pattern jury instructions rarely provide more than minimal guidance on the issue of expert testimony.
Few jurisdictions instruct jurors on the factors to be considered in properly determining the value of the expert testimony, with the majority of jurisdictions emphasizing that expert testimony should be evaluated in the same manner as lay witness testimony.
Consistent with existing professional standards and legal commentary, judges and lawyers should develop more informative instructions that provide jurors with specific factors that affect the reliability and value of the expert opinion testimony.

Related Results

Revisiting Jury Instructions on Racial Prejudice Towards Indigenous Peoples in Criminal Jury Trials
Revisiting Jury Instructions on Racial Prejudice Towards Indigenous Peoples in Criminal Jury Trials
<p>This article examines the Supreme Court of Canada’s assumptions in Barton and Chouhan on racial bias in Canadian criminal jury trials. Jury research offers important insig...
Revisiting Jury Instructions on Racial Prejudice Towards Indigenous Peoples in Criminal Jury Trials
Revisiting Jury Instructions on Racial Prejudice Towards Indigenous Peoples in Criminal Jury Trials
<p>This article examines the Supreme Court of Canada’s assumptions in Barton and Chouhan on racial bias in Canadian criminal jury trials. Jury research offers important insig...
Public Scientific Testimony I
Public Scientific Testimony I
Abstract Chapter 5 concerns scientific expert testimony—i.e., testimony from scientific experts to laypersons. It surveys empirical research on social and psychologi...
Jury Comprehension of Expert Evidence
Jury Comprehension of Expert Evidence
AbstractThe effectiveness of expert testimony in litigation is limited by a factor independent of the strength of opinion testimony—the level of comprehension of the jurors. If the...
Scientific Testimony
Scientific Testimony
Abstract Scientific Testimony concerns the roles of scientific testimony in science and society. The book develops a positive alternative to a tradition famously exp...
Testimony and the Scientific Enterprise
Testimony and the Scientific Enterprise
Abstract Chapter 1 opens with some conceptual clarifications and a provisional taxonomy of types of scientific testimony. Notably, this includes the distinction betw...
The Disobedient Jury: Why Lawmakers Should Codify Jury Nullification
The Disobedient Jury: Why Lawmakers Should Codify Jury Nullification
102 Cornell Law Review 1401 (2017)One primary goal of criminal law is to produce justice. In order to obtain justice, the citizens of a republic delegate power to representatives, ...
The Impact of Case Characteristics and Prior Jury Experience on Jury Verdicts1
The Impact of Case Characteristics and Prior Jury Experience on Jury Verdicts1
An archival analysis of records from 206 criminal cases was used to evaluate the impact of personal and situational factors on jury verdicts. In particular, we evaluated whether re...

Back to Top