Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Health-related quality of life scores of metastatic pancreatic cancer patients responsive to first line chemotherapy compared to newly derived EORTC QLQ-C30 reference values
View through CrossRef
Abstract
Background
Metastatic pancreatic cancer (mPC) and its treatments significantly impact health-related quality of life (HRQoL). POLO, a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial evaluated the efficacy of olaparib as maintenance therapy in germline BRCA mutated mPC patients who had not progressed during ≥16 weeks of first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. HRQoL was assessed using the EORTC QLQ-C30. To enhance score interpretation, we derived reference values for treatment-naïve mPC patients from the literature.
Methods
A targeted literature review identified EORTC QLQ-C30 baseline values in treatment-naïve mPC patients. Reference values were calculated by deriving means from studies meeting inclusion criteria, with scores from 0 to 100 (higher scores indicate better QoL/functioning but worse symptoms). For POLO patients, means were calculated using pooled baseline data across study arms.
Results
Four studies met inclusion criteria. Depending on the specific scale, sample sizes ranged from n = 466 to n = 639. Compared to newly derived reference values, POLO patients reported markedly better HRQoL scores at baseline across most scales, with eight scales showing differences of ≥10 points. POLO patients’ HRQoL scores were often close to or better than general population norm data.
Conclusions
This is the first study to systematically derive EORTC QLQ-C30 reference values for mPC. POLO patients had better HRQoL scores than those in the literature and similar to general population data. Comparatively high HRQoL of POLO patients are likely due to effects of prior first-line treatment and resolution of chemotherapy-related symptoms, response shift, or a combination. Newly derived reference values can enhance interpretation of mPC patients’ HRQoL.
Trial registration
The POLO trial was registered on 9 July 2014 with ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT 02184195.
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Title: Health-related quality of life scores of metastatic pancreatic cancer patients responsive to first line chemotherapy compared to newly derived EORTC QLQ-C30 reference values
Description:
Abstract
Background
Metastatic pancreatic cancer (mPC) and its treatments significantly impact health-related quality of life (HRQoL).
POLO, a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial evaluated the efficacy of olaparib as maintenance therapy in germline BRCA mutated mPC patients who had not progressed during ≥16 weeks of first-line platinum-based chemotherapy.
HRQoL was assessed using the EORTC QLQ-C30.
To enhance score interpretation, we derived reference values for treatment-naïve mPC patients from the literature.
Methods
A targeted literature review identified EORTC QLQ-C30 baseline values in treatment-naïve mPC patients.
Reference values were calculated by deriving means from studies meeting inclusion criteria, with scores from 0 to 100 (higher scores indicate better QoL/functioning but worse symptoms).
For POLO patients, means were calculated using pooled baseline data across study arms.
Results
Four studies met inclusion criteria.
Depending on the specific scale, sample sizes ranged from n = 466 to n = 639.
Compared to newly derived reference values, POLO patients reported markedly better HRQoL scores at baseline across most scales, with eight scales showing differences of ≥10 points.
POLO patients’ HRQoL scores were often close to or better than general population norm data.
Conclusions
This is the first study to systematically derive EORTC QLQ-C30 reference values for mPC.
POLO patients had better HRQoL scores than those in the literature and similar to general population data.
Comparatively high HRQoL of POLO patients are likely due to effects of prior first-line treatment and resolution of chemotherapy-related symptoms, response shift, or a combination.
Newly derived reference values can enhance interpretation of mPC patients’ HRQoL.
Trial registration
The POLO trial was registered on 9 July 2014 with ClinicalTrials.
gov as NCT 02184195.
Related Results
Reference values for EORTC QLQ-C30, for metastatic pancreatic cancer (mPC): Enhancing the interpretation of HRQoL scores in the POLO trial.
Reference values for EORTC QLQ-C30, for metastatic pancreatic cancer (mPC): Enhancing the interpretation of HRQoL scores in the POLO trial.
393 Background: Metastatic pancreatic cancer (mPC) and its treatments significantly impact patients’ (pts) health-related quality of life (HRQoL). POLO, a randomized, double-blind...
Abstract IA-08: Clinical advances in pancreas adenocarcinoma
Abstract IA-08: Clinical advances in pancreas adenocarcinoma
Abstract
Pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains one of the most lethal cancers today and is expected to be the second cause of cancer death in the coming decade. M...
Microwave Ablation with or Without Chemotherapy in Management of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review
Microwave Ablation with or Without Chemotherapy in Management of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review
Abstract
Introduction
Microwave ablation (MWA) has emerged as a minimally invasive treatment for patients with inoperable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, whether it i...
Wirsungectomy for pancreatic hypertension in chronic pancreatitis
Wirsungectomy for pancreatic hypertension in chronic pancreatitis
Background. Pain in chronic pancreatitis (CP) can occur as a consequence of mechanical factors— pancreatic ductal hypertension, interstitial pressure, inflammatory and neuropathic ...
Small Cell Lung Cancer and Tarlatamab: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials
Small Cell Lung Cancer and Tarlatamab: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials
Abstract
Introduction
Tarlatamab is a Delta-like ligand 3 (DLL3) -directed bispecific T-cell engager recently approved for use in patients with advanced small cell lung cancer (SCL...
Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) impact of pembrolizumab (pembro) plus best supportive care (BSC) versus placebo (PBO) plus BSC as second-line (2L) therapy in patients (pts) in Asia with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC): Phase 3 KEYNOTE-394 s
Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) impact of pembrolizumab (pembro) plus best supportive care (BSC) versus placebo (PBO) plus BSC as second-line (2L) therapy in patients (pts) in Asia with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC): Phase 3 KEYNOTE-394 s
4088 Background: In the randomized, double-blind, phase 3 KEYNOTE-394 trial (NCT03062358), pembro + BSC vs PBO + BSC as 2L therapy significantly reduced the risk of death by 21% (...
Evaluation of Quality of Life After Total Laryngectomy
Evaluation of Quality of Life After Total Laryngectomy
Abstract
Purpose
Total laryngectomy is a surgical approach performed due to advanced-stage cancers and significantly affects the patient's post-operative quality of life. ...
Development of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (Symptoms and Impacts) in Adults with Pyruvate Kinase Deficiency
Development of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (Symptoms and Impacts) in Adults with Pyruvate Kinase Deficiency
Introduction: Pyruvate kinase (PK) deficiency is a rare, congenital autosomal recessive hemolytic anemia managed with supportive treatments, including transfusion, splenectomy, and...

