Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

History of Evolutionary Thought, 1860–1925

View through CrossRef
The reaction to the publication of Darwin’s On the Origin of Species was as varied as the sources from which it emanated. Responses ranged from those of naturalists, physical scientists, and religious leaders and theologians to social scientists, political activists, historians, and even artists from George Eliot and Fyodor Dostoyevsky to Richard Wagner. Darwin’s work was as controversial as he feared it would be, so he left defending it in the scientific world, to his “bulldog” Thomas Henry Huxley. The initial reaction, dating between the years 1860 and 1882 (Darwin’s death), included numerous scientific critiques, some of which were highly favorable, even if not agreeing with Darwin in all details. Others, however, attacked virtually every aspect of Darwin’s theory from his concept of heredity to his insistence on gradualism and including his vagueness about how speciation would actually come about. In addition, the immediate reaction by theologians was often quite virulent, and it has remained to plague evolutionary theory down to the present. The sociological spin-off into what has loosely been called “social Darwinism” and other evolutionary views of history was also immediate and highly influential. Few historians or social scientists were able to ignore the impact of Darwin’s ideas on their field, however much some may have wanted to resist it. The general period in the history of Darwinism from 1860 to 1925, then, is one marked by numerous controversies, even as many, at least in the scientific realm, began to reach some sort of resolution by the time of the so-called evolutionary synthesis of the later 1920s and 1930s. This article will focus on the period leading up to, but not including, the synthesis and beyond.
Oxford University Press
Title: History of Evolutionary Thought, 1860–1925
Description:
The reaction to the publication of Darwin’s On the Origin of Species was as varied as the sources from which it emanated.
Responses ranged from those of naturalists, physical scientists, and religious leaders and theologians to social scientists, political activists, historians, and even artists from George Eliot and Fyodor Dostoyevsky to Richard Wagner.
Darwin’s work was as controversial as he feared it would be, so he left defending it in the scientific world, to his “bulldog” Thomas Henry Huxley.
The initial reaction, dating between the years 1860 and 1882 (Darwin’s death), included numerous scientific critiques, some of which were highly favorable, even if not agreeing with Darwin in all details.
Others, however, attacked virtually every aspect of Darwin’s theory from his concept of heredity to his insistence on gradualism and including his vagueness about how speciation would actually come about.
In addition, the immediate reaction by theologians was often quite virulent, and it has remained to plague evolutionary theory down to the present.
The sociological spin-off into what has loosely been called “social Darwinism” and other evolutionary views of history was also immediate and highly influential.
Few historians or social scientists were able to ignore the impact of Darwin’s ideas on their field, however much some may have wanted to resist it.
The general period in the history of Darwinism from 1860 to 1925, then, is one marked by numerous controversies, even as many, at least in the scientific realm, began to reach some sort of resolution by the time of the so-called evolutionary synthesis of the later 1920s and 1930s.
This article will focus on the period leading up to, but not including, the synthesis and beyond.

Related Results

Evolution and the cell
Evolution and the cell
Genotype to phenotype, and back again Evolution is intimately linked to biology at the cellular scale- evolutionary processes act on the very genetic material that is carried and ...
Thought experiments: identity and efficiency issues
Thought experiments: identity and efficiency issues
The article analyzes two problems related to thought experiments based on a study of the contemporary philosophical discussion about the nature and structure of thought experiments...
Evolutionary Medicine
Evolutionary Medicine
Abstract Evolutionary medicine is a fast‐growing research field providing biomedical scientists with evolutionary perspective for the comprehens...
Evolutionary Biomechanics
Evolutionary Biomechanics
Life has diversified on Earth in many stunning ways. Understanding how this diversity arose and has been maintained is a common interest for many evolutionary biologists. One appro...
Evolutionary Medicine
Evolutionary Medicine
Evolutionary medicine, sometimes referred to as Darwinian medicine, is an emerging academic field that employs evolutionary principles to aid in the understanding of human health a...
Robots Need Some Education
Robots Need Some Education
Evolutionary Robotics and Robot Learning are two fields in robotics that aim to automatically optimize robot designs. The key difference between them lies in what is being optimize...
The Evolution of the Symbolic Sciences
The Evolution of the Symbolic Sciences
Abstract Aspects of human symbolic evolution are studied by scholars active in a variety of fields and disciplines in the life and the behavioral sciences as well as...
The Philosophy of Evolutionary Biology
The Philosophy of Evolutionary Biology
Philosophy of evolutionary biology is a major subfield of philosophy of biology concerned with the methods, conceptual foundations, and implications of evolutionary biology. It als...

Back to Top