Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Human wildlife conflict systematic review in Ethiopia

View through CrossRef
Abstract In Ethiopia, human-wildlife conflict is a major problem where most people depend on domestic animals and crops. These activities exacerbate human-wildlife conflict. Therefore, this systematic review examined human-wildlife conflict in Ethiopia by synthesizing data from 64 studies conducted between 2009 and 30 August 2025. The papers were searched in major academic databases like Google scholar and Scopus. A total of 53 wildlife species were identified as crop raiders and livestock predators across different geographical locations of Ethiopia. Human-wildlife conflict across geographical locations in Ethiopia was driven by several factors. Among these causes, crop raiding (33 of 64 studies) and livestock depredation (30 of 64 studies) were the most frequently reported sources of conflict. Crop raiding was the leading source of human-wildlife conflict. The northern regions of the country recorded the highest crop loss, with an average of 120.2 kg per household per year. This was due to agricultural expansions around wildlife habitats. Livestock loss caused by wildlife varies across different geographical locations of the country. In the eastern parts of the country, the highest livestock loss was recorded, with an average loss of 14 number of livestock per household year per. Local communities used several techniques to manage human-wildlife conflict. Among these management techniques, guarding, physical barriers, symbols, and chasing were the most commonly used methods. Guarding was the primary human-wildlife conflict management technique. The perceptions and attitudes of local communities towards wildlife populations varied across the regions. In all regions of the country, local communities generally showed a negative attitude towards the wildlife population. Therefore, integrated management approaches, coordination, and awareness creation for the local communities are essential.
Title: Human wildlife conflict systematic review in Ethiopia
Description:
Abstract In Ethiopia, human-wildlife conflict is a major problem where most people depend on domestic animals and crops.
These activities exacerbate human-wildlife conflict.
Therefore, this systematic review examined human-wildlife conflict in Ethiopia by synthesizing data from 64 studies conducted between 2009 and 30 August 2025.
The papers were searched in major academic databases like Google scholar and Scopus.
A total of 53 wildlife species were identified as crop raiders and livestock predators across different geographical locations of Ethiopia.
Human-wildlife conflict across geographical locations in Ethiopia was driven by several factors.
Among these causes, crop raiding (33 of 64 studies) and livestock depredation (30 of 64 studies) were the most frequently reported sources of conflict.
Crop raiding was the leading source of human-wildlife conflict.
The northern regions of the country recorded the highest crop loss, with an average of 120.
2 kg per household per year.
This was due to agricultural expansions around wildlife habitats.
Livestock loss caused by wildlife varies across different geographical locations of the country.
In the eastern parts of the country, the highest livestock loss was recorded, with an average loss of 14 number of livestock per household year per.
Local communities used several techniques to manage human-wildlife conflict.
Among these management techniques, guarding, physical barriers, symbols, and chasing were the most commonly used methods.
Guarding was the primary human-wildlife conflict management technique.
The perceptions and attitudes of local communities towards wildlife populations varied across the regions.
In all regions of the country, local communities generally showed a negative attitude towards the wildlife population.
Therefore, integrated management approaches, coordination, and awareness creation for the local communities are essential.

Related Results

METAPHORICAL REPRESENTATION OF THE CONCEPT CONFLICT IN AMERICAN AND BRITISH POLITICAL DISCOURSE (BASED ON IMAGE METAPHORS)
METAPHORICAL REPRESENTATION OF THE CONCEPT CONFLICT IN AMERICAN AND BRITISH POLITICAL DISCOURSE (BASED ON IMAGE METAPHORS)
The article is devoted to the metaphorical representation of the concept CONFLICT in the English-language political discourse, namely American and British. The figurative content o...
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Abstract The Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans (Guidelines) advises older adults to be as active as possible. Yet, despite the well documented benefits of physical a...
Rearticulating the myth of human–wildlife conflict
Rearticulating the myth of human–wildlife conflict
AbstractHuman–wildlife conflict has emerged as the central vocabulary for cases requiring balance between resource demands of humans and wildlife. This phrase is problematic becaus...
PASTORALIST-WILDLIFE RELATIONSHIP IN THE AMBOSELI ECOSYSTEM SOUTHEASTERN KENYA: A CASE STUDY OF MAASAI COMMUNITY
PASTORALIST-WILDLIFE RELATIONSHIP IN THE AMBOSELI ECOSYSTEM SOUTHEASTERN KENYA: A CASE STUDY OF MAASAI COMMUNITY
Purpose: To establish the pastoralist-wildlife relationship in the Amboseli Ecosystem South Eastern Kenya.Methodology: The study utilized a descriptive research design.Findings: Re...
From restoration to ruin: Wildlife conservation dilemmas and ecological resilience in war-affected Tigray, northern Ethiopia
From restoration to ruin: Wildlife conservation dilemmas and ecological resilience in war-affected Tigray, northern Ethiopia
The armed conflict in Tigray (2020-2022), northern Ethiopia reversed decades of conservation gains, yet its impacts on wildlife conservation remain largely undocumented. This study...
Drivers of Conflict between Pastoralists and Wildlife Conservation Authority: A Case of Muhesi Game Reserve
Drivers of Conflict between Pastoralists and Wildlife Conservation Authority: A Case of Muhesi Game Reserve
Conflict between pastoralist and wildlife in Tanzania becomes the issues of discussion by different stakeholders at different levels, this study state general objective that assess...
Conflict Management in the Workplace
Conflict Management in the Workplace
Conflict is a component of interpersonal interactions, and therefore natural in the workplace. While neither inevitable nor intrinsically bad, conflict is commonplace. Conflicts ma...

Back to Top