Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Abstract 1370: Barriers to sharing biospecimens or biospecimen data among researchers: qualitative findings from a regional survey.
View through CrossRef
Abstract
Background:
Efforts to identify biological and genetic factors contributing to cancer health disparities have increased the need to access biospecimens from diverse populations. One challenge is the limited number of specimens from diverse populations within existing biobanks. Members of certain racial/ethnic minority groups may be less aware of or less willing to participate in biospecimen donation opportunities. Second, although there are already a large number of established biorepositories nationwide, it remains a challenge for researchers to allocate sufficient, well-annotated tumor tissues to these repositories. As such it is important to determine the perceived barriers and attitudes to sharing data and biospecimens among researchers; and in turn inform programs on ways to increase sharing of limited biospecimens collected from diverse populations. This qualitative study assessed data sharing practices, barriers and concerns of researchers in a 5-state region (AZ, CO, NM, OK and TX). Little is known about the data sharing perceptions of researchers in this region, which is multi-cultural and multi ethnic.
Methods:
The present qualitative analysis was part of a larger study that assessed researchers’ willingness to participate in a virtual national biorepository. NIH RePORT db was used to identify 605 individuals engaging in research involving biospecimens. Email invitations to complete an online survey were sent with an embedded informed consent, via a secure state-specific link; 119 participants responded. Open-ended questions captured the respondents’ perceived barriers to implementation of a national biorepository; common reasons for refusal of individuals to donate specimens; requirements for collaborating and sharing data; and their concerns if unwilling to share biospecimens/data. A thematic analysis was conducted on these responses using two independent coders. Participants reported a variety of common themes on each of the questions.
Results:
Most respondents were principal investigators at PhD granting institutions (91.1%), conducting basic (62.3%), translational (43.9%), clinical (8.8%), and epidemiological (5.3%) research. Most were non-Hispanic White (63.4%), males (60.6%). Respondents provided 255 detailed statements. Legal and ethical concerns and requirements for biospecimen sharing were a persistent theme. Methodological concerns were also raised including sample quality, sample size and study design. Sharing biospecimens beyond the home institution was also raised as a barrier to data sharing in a number of contexts.
Impact:
Determining the perceived barriers and attitudinal factors to sharing data will help generate recommendations to increase researchers’ participation in the scientific data sharing process involving high-quality, multi-ethnic human biospecimens. This will ultimately reduce cancer health disparities.
Citation Format: Mai H. Oushy, Rebecca Palacios, Mary A. O'connell. Barriers to sharing biospecimens or biospecimen data among researchers: qualitative findings from a regional survey. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 104th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2013 Apr 6-10; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2013;73(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 1370. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2013-1370
American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Title: Abstract 1370: Barriers to sharing biospecimens or biospecimen data among researchers: qualitative findings from a regional survey.
Description:
Abstract
Background:
Efforts to identify biological and genetic factors contributing to cancer health disparities have increased the need to access biospecimens from diverse populations.
One challenge is the limited number of specimens from diverse populations within existing biobanks.
Members of certain racial/ethnic minority groups may be less aware of or less willing to participate in biospecimen donation opportunities.
Second, although there are already a large number of established biorepositories nationwide, it remains a challenge for researchers to allocate sufficient, well-annotated tumor tissues to these repositories.
As such it is important to determine the perceived barriers and attitudes to sharing data and biospecimens among researchers; and in turn inform programs on ways to increase sharing of limited biospecimens collected from diverse populations.
This qualitative study assessed data sharing practices, barriers and concerns of researchers in a 5-state region (AZ, CO, NM, OK and TX).
Little is known about the data sharing perceptions of researchers in this region, which is multi-cultural and multi ethnic.
Methods:
The present qualitative analysis was part of a larger study that assessed researchers’ willingness to participate in a virtual national biorepository.
NIH RePORT db was used to identify 605 individuals engaging in research involving biospecimens.
Email invitations to complete an online survey were sent with an embedded informed consent, via a secure state-specific link; 119 participants responded.
Open-ended questions captured the respondents’ perceived barriers to implementation of a national biorepository; common reasons for refusal of individuals to donate specimens; requirements for collaborating and sharing data; and their concerns if unwilling to share biospecimens/data.
A thematic analysis was conducted on these responses using two independent coders.
Participants reported a variety of common themes on each of the questions.
Results:
Most respondents were principal investigators at PhD granting institutions (91.
1%), conducting basic (62.
3%), translational (43.
9%), clinical (8.
8%), and epidemiological (5.
3%) research.
Most were non-Hispanic White (63.
4%), males (60.
6%).
Respondents provided 255 detailed statements.
Legal and ethical concerns and requirements for biospecimen sharing were a persistent theme.
Methodological concerns were also raised including sample quality, sample size and study design.
Sharing biospecimens beyond the home institution was also raised as a barrier to data sharing in a number of contexts.
Impact:
Determining the perceived barriers and attitudinal factors to sharing data will help generate recommendations to increase researchers’ participation in the scientific data sharing process involving high-quality, multi-ethnic human biospecimens.
This will ultimately reduce cancer health disparities.
Citation Format: Mai H.
Oushy, Rebecca Palacios, Mary A.
O'connell.
Barriers to sharing biospecimens or biospecimen data among researchers: qualitative findings from a regional survey.
[abstract].
In: Proceedings of the 104th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2013 Apr 6-10; Washington, DC.
Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2013;73(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 1370.
doi:10.
1158/1538-7445.
AM2013-1370.
Related Results
The use of human biospecimens for research
The use of human biospecimens for research
AbstractThis discussion presents many of the ethical, legal, and financial issues that underlie the contemporary regulatory framework for research with human biospecimens. Some con...
JIT 2023 - Jornadas de Jóvenes Investigadores Tecnológicos
JIT 2023 - Jornadas de Jóvenes Investigadores Tecnológicos
Es un honor presentar este libro que compila los trabajos de investigación y desarrollo presentados en las Jornadas de Jóvenes Investigadores Tecnológicos (JIT) 2023. Este evento s...
Biobanking Framework: “One Size Fits All”
Biobanking Framework: “One Size Fits All”
Abstract
Background Biobanking has been identified as a key area for development in order to accelerate the discovery and development of new drugs. biobanks include not onl...
A cervical cancer biorepository for pharmacogenomics research in Zimbabwe
A cervical cancer biorepository for pharmacogenomics research in Zimbabwe
AbstractBackgroundResearch infrastructures such as biorepositories are essential to facilitate genomics and its growing applications in health research and translational medicine i...
Non-Recommended Publishing Lists: Strategies for Detecting Deceitful Journals
Non-Recommended Publishing Lists: Strategies for Detecting Deceitful Journals
Abstract
The rapid growth of open access publishing (OAP) has significantly improved the accessibility and dissemination of scientific knowledge. However, this expansion has also c...
Access Denied
Access Denied
Introduction
As social-distancing mandates in response to COVID-19 restricted in-person data collection methods such as participant observation and interviews, researchers turned t...
XXV Encuentro Nacional y XVII Encuentro Internacional de Educación Matemática en Carreras de Ingeniería -EMCI
XXV Encuentro Nacional y XVII Encuentro Internacional de Educación Matemática en Carreras de Ingeniería -EMCI
El Encuentro de Educación Matemática en Carreras de Ingeniería (EMCI) se ha consolidado, a lo largo de sus veinticinco ediciones nacionales y diecisiete internacionales, como un es...
Biospecimen Collection and Handling in Clinical Trials: Integrating Nursing, Laboratory, Pharmacy, and Health Security Perspectives
Biospecimen Collection and Handling in Clinical Trials: Integrating Nursing, Laboratory, Pharmacy, and Health Security Perspectives
Background: Biospecimen integrity is fundamental to the validity of clinical trial results, yet the complexity of modern protocols requires seamless multidisciplinary coordination....

