Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Healthcare lobbying and oncology.
View through CrossRef
5 Background: The healthcare industry spends more on lobbying than any other industry, with over $700 million spent in 2022. However, healthcare lobbying related specifically to cancer has not been characterized. In the current study, we analyze both overall health sector lobbying spending and oncology-related lobbying spending across both provider and patient organizations. Methods: We obtained lobbying data from OpenSecrets.org and the Federal Election Commission website. We categorized overall health sector lobbying spending as (1) Pharmaceuticals/Health Products, (2) Health Services/HMOs, (3) Hospitals/Nursing Homes, or (4) Health Professionals. We identified and categorized oncology-related lobbying organizations: (1) Oncology Physician Professional Organizations (OPOs, e.g., ASCO); (2) PPS-Exempt Cancer Hospitals; (3) Patient Advocacy Organizations; and (4) Provider Networks (e.g., US Oncology Network). We analyzed temporal trends in lobbying spending, in both overall dollar value (inflation-adjusted 2023 dollars) and in per-physician spending (using AAMC data for number of hematologists/oncologists). Significance was analyzed using a Mann-Kendall Trend Test. Results: Of overall health sector lobbying, Pharmaceuticals/Health Products had the greatest increase in lobbying spending from 2014 to 2022, with an increase from $294 million to $376 million (28%, p = 0.0006). In contrast, lobbying spending by health professionals did not change over this period, remaining at $96 million (p = 0.35). Regarding oncology-related lobbying, per-physician spending by OPOs and PPS-exempt cancer hospitals increased (Table). Overall, OPO lobbying has increased as a percentage of overall physician lobbying from 1.16% in 2014 to 3.76% in 2022 (not shown). Conclusions: While overall health sector lobbying spending by physicians/health professional lobbying has been relatively stable in recent years, lobbying spending by OPOs has increased. Continued efforts to understand the utility and value of lobbying in healthcare and across oncology are needed as the costs of care continue to rise. [Table: see text]
American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
Title: Healthcare lobbying and oncology.
Description:
5 Background: The healthcare industry spends more on lobbying than any other industry, with over $700 million spent in 2022.
However, healthcare lobbying related specifically to cancer has not been characterized.
In the current study, we analyze both overall health sector lobbying spending and oncology-related lobbying spending across both provider and patient organizations.
Methods: We obtained lobbying data from OpenSecrets.
org and the Federal Election Commission website.
We categorized overall health sector lobbying spending as (1) Pharmaceuticals/Health Products, (2) Health Services/HMOs, (3) Hospitals/Nursing Homes, or (4) Health Professionals.
We identified and categorized oncology-related lobbying organizations: (1) Oncology Physician Professional Organizations (OPOs, e.
g.
, ASCO); (2) PPS-Exempt Cancer Hospitals; (3) Patient Advocacy Organizations; and (4) Provider Networks (e.
g.
, US Oncology Network).
We analyzed temporal trends in lobbying spending, in both overall dollar value (inflation-adjusted 2023 dollars) and in per-physician spending (using AAMC data for number of hematologists/oncologists).
Significance was analyzed using a Mann-Kendall Trend Test.
Results: Of overall health sector lobbying, Pharmaceuticals/Health Products had the greatest increase in lobbying spending from 2014 to 2022, with an increase from $294 million to $376 million (28%, p = 0.
0006).
In contrast, lobbying spending by health professionals did not change over this period, remaining at $96 million (p = 0.
35).
Regarding oncology-related lobbying, per-physician spending by OPOs and PPS-exempt cancer hospitals increased (Table).
Overall, OPO lobbying has increased as a percentage of overall physician lobbying from 1.
16% in 2014 to 3.
76% in 2022 (not shown).
Conclusions: While overall health sector lobbying spending by physicians/health professional lobbying has been relatively stable in recent years, lobbying spending by OPOs has increased.
Continued efforts to understand the utility and value of lobbying in healthcare and across oncology are needed as the costs of care continue to rise.
[Table: see text].
Related Results
Perceptions of Telemedicine and Rural Healthcare Access in a Developing Country: A Case Study of Bayelsa State, Nigeria
Perceptions of Telemedicine and Rural Healthcare Access in a Developing Country: A Case Study of Bayelsa State, Nigeria
Abstract
Introduction
Telemedicine is the remote delivery of healthcare services using information and communication technologies and has gained global recognition as a solution to...
Essays on corruption and corporate finance
Essays on corruption and corporate finance
The essays in my dissertation investigate how political corruption affects business decisions made by firms. In the first essay (co-authored with Jacqueline Garner and Adam Yore), ...
Green Product Portfolio and Environmental Lobbying
Green Product Portfolio and Environmental Lobbying
AbstractNowadays, a growing number of firms utilize corporate lobbying to advocate for more environmentally friendly policies and regulations, deviating from the traditional lobbyi...
Regulating Lobbying in International and Transnational Spheres
Regulating Lobbying in International and Transnational Spheres
Lobbying is an integral part of contemporary international processes. Globalization, spread of market relations and transnational links, liberalization of national and supranationa...
Collective irresponsibility: corporate reputations and the role of associations in lobbying
Collective irresponsibility: corporate reputations and the role of associations in lobbying
Abstract
Why do companies sometimes lobby legislators directly and sometimes act predominantly through business associations? Although economic factors, such as size and profita...
Accuracy of medical oncology prognosis for patients with metastatic cancer evaluated for enrollment onto an ongoing randomized clinical trial.
Accuracy of medical oncology prognosis for patients with metastatic cancer evaluated for enrollment onto an ongoing randomized clinical trial.
12063 Background: For patients with metastatic cancer, a key aspect of interdisciplinary care has involved the overall prognosis provided by Medical Oncology, which often dictates...
Innovation in corporate finance
Innovation in corporate finance
This dissertation focuses on corporate innovation. The three essays explore different aspects of how corporations manage, motivate, and use their innovation. The first essay explor...

