Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

The FDA’s Proposed Rule on Laboratory-Developed Tests: Impacts on Clinical Laboratory Testing and Patient Care

View through CrossRef
ABSTRACT In October 2023, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) released a proposed rule to regulate laboratory-developed tests (LDTs) as medical devices. While approximately 6,700 public comments were submitted during the open comment period, there is not a reliable mechanism to quantify how clinical laboratorians as a sector perceive the proposed rule. To solicit quantifiable feedback on the FDA’s proposed rule, a ten-item questionnaire was developed and submitted to clinical laboratory customers of ARUP Laboratories, a national nonprofit clinical laboratory of the University of Utah Department of Pathology. Of 503 clinical laboratory respondents, only 41 (8.2%) support the FDA’s proposed rule. 66.9% of respondents work in laboratories that perform LDTs and were therefore asked additional questions regarding the proposed rule. 83.9% of these respondents believe that the proposed rule will negatively impact their laboratories, while only 3.0% believe that they have the financial resources to pay for FDA user fees. 60.9% of respondents anticipate removing tests from their laboratory menus if the proposed rule is enacted, while an additional 33.2% indicated that they do not yet know. Only 11.2% of respondents believe that they would pursue FDA submissions for all of their existing LDTs if the final rule is enacted. The vast majority of respondents (>80%) were either ‘extremely concerned’ or ‘very concerned’ about the impact of the proposed rule on patient access to essential testing, financial and personnel resources to comply, innovation, the FDA’s ability to implement the proposed rule, and send-out costs and test prices. Respondents indicated that they would rely heavily on reference laboratory partners for advocacy against the proposed rule, testing options, education, and consultation if the rule was enacted. Thematic analysis of open comments revealed strong opposition to the proposed rule and significant concern regarding negative impacts to patient care across clinical laboratory settings.
Title: The FDA’s Proposed Rule on Laboratory-Developed Tests: Impacts on Clinical Laboratory Testing and Patient Care
Description:
ABSTRACT In October 2023, the U.
S.
Food and Drug Administration (FDA) released a proposed rule to regulate laboratory-developed tests (LDTs) as medical devices.
While approximately 6,700 public comments were submitted during the open comment period, there is not a reliable mechanism to quantify how clinical laboratorians as a sector perceive the proposed rule.
To solicit quantifiable feedback on the FDA’s proposed rule, a ten-item questionnaire was developed and submitted to clinical laboratory customers of ARUP Laboratories, a national nonprofit clinical laboratory of the University of Utah Department of Pathology.
Of 503 clinical laboratory respondents, only 41 (8.
2%) support the FDA’s proposed rule.
66.
9% of respondents work in laboratories that perform LDTs and were therefore asked additional questions regarding the proposed rule.
83.
9% of these respondents believe that the proposed rule will negatively impact their laboratories, while only 3.
0% believe that they have the financial resources to pay for FDA user fees.
60.
9% of respondents anticipate removing tests from their laboratory menus if the proposed rule is enacted, while an additional 33.
2% indicated that they do not yet know.
Only 11.
2% of respondents believe that they would pursue FDA submissions for all of their existing LDTs if the final rule is enacted.
The vast majority of respondents (>80%) were either ‘extremely concerned’ or ‘very concerned’ about the impact of the proposed rule on patient access to essential testing, financial and personnel resources to comply, innovation, the FDA’s ability to implement the proposed rule, and send-out costs and test prices.
Respondents indicated that they would rely heavily on reference laboratory partners for advocacy against the proposed rule, testing options, education, and consultation if the rule was enacted.
Thematic analysis of open comments revealed strong opposition to the proposed rule and significant concern regarding negative impacts to patient care across clinical laboratory settings.

Related Results

Autonomy on Trial
Autonomy on Trial
Photo by CHUTTERSNAP on Unsplash Abstract This paper critically examines how US bioethics and health law conceptualize patient autonomy, contrasting the rights-based, individualist...
Organisatie van geestelijke gezondheidszorg voor mensen met een ernstige en persisterende mentale aandoening
Organisatie van geestelijke gezondheidszorg voor mensen met een ernstige en persisterende mentale aandoening
1 INTRODUCTION AND RESEARCH QUESTIONS 5 -- 2 GENERAL BACKGROUND: DEFINITIONS AND SCOPE OF THE STUDY 7 -- 2.1 CHRONIC AND COMPLEX MENTAL DISORDERS: DEFINITIONS AND SCOPE OF THE -- S...
Provocative Tests in Diagnosis of Thoracic Outlet Syndrome: A Narrative Review
Provocative Tests in Diagnosis of Thoracic Outlet Syndrome: A Narrative Review
Abstract Thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) is a group of conditions caused by the compression of the neurovascular bundle within the thoracic outlet. It is classified into three main ...
Knowledge and Perceptions of FDA Tobacco Regulation among U.S. Adults in 2015
Knowledge and Perceptions of FDA Tobacco Regulation among U.S. Adults in 2015
Introduction: The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is interested in understanding the factors which influence knowledge and perceptions of the FDA as a credible source for i...
Sweet Caroline: The Backslide from Federal Rule of Evidence 613(b) to the Rule in Queen Caroline's Case
Sweet Caroline: The Backslide from Federal Rule of Evidence 613(b) to the Rule in Queen Caroline's Case
Since 1975, Rule 613(b) of the Federal Rules of Evidence has governed the admission of extrinsic evidence of a prior inconsistent statement in federal court. Rule 613(b) requires ...
Towards more goal-oriented care through care coordination and care planning.
Towards more goal-oriented care through care coordination and care planning.
The increasing aging of our society is putting increasing pressure on the current organization of care and support. This moved the Flemish government to a thorough reform of primar...
The new U.S. FDA regulations on biocompatibility and reprocessing for medical devices
The new U.S. FDA regulations on biocompatibility and reprocessing for medical devices
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration ("FDA") regulates all medical devices in the United States. As part of its regulatory duties, the FDA provides guidance documents on various r...

Back to Top