Javascript must be enabled to continue!
The FDA’s Proposed Rule on Laboratory-Developed Tests: Impacts on Clinical Laboratory Testing and Patient Care
View through CrossRef
ABSTRACT
In October 2023, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) released a proposed rule to regulate laboratory-developed tests (LDTs) as medical devices. While approximately 6,700 public comments were submitted during the open comment period, there is not a reliable mechanism to quantify how clinical laboratorians as a sector perceive the proposed rule. To solicit quantifiable feedback on the FDA’s proposed rule, a ten-item questionnaire was developed and submitted to clinical laboratory customers of ARUP Laboratories, a national nonprofit clinical laboratory of the University of Utah Department of Pathology.
Of 503 clinical laboratory respondents, only 41 (8.2%) support the FDA’s proposed rule. 66.9% of respondents work in laboratories that perform LDTs and were therefore asked additional questions regarding the proposed rule. 83.9% of these respondents believe that the proposed rule will negatively impact their laboratories, while only 3.0% believe that they have the financial resources to pay for FDA user fees. 60.9% of respondents anticipate removing tests from their laboratory menus if the proposed rule is enacted, while an additional 33.2% indicated that they do not yet know. Only 11.2% of respondents believe that they would pursue FDA submissions for all of their existing LDTs if the final rule is enacted.
The vast majority of respondents (>80%) were either ‘extremely concerned’ or ‘very concerned’ about the impact of the proposed rule on patient access to essential testing, financial and personnel resources to comply, innovation, the FDA’s ability to implement the proposed rule, and send-out costs and test prices. Respondents indicated that they would rely heavily on reference laboratory partners for advocacy against the proposed rule, testing options, education, and consultation if the rule was enacted. Thematic analysis of open comments revealed strong opposition to the proposed rule and significant concern regarding negative impacts to patient care across clinical laboratory settings.
Title: The FDA’s Proposed Rule on Laboratory-Developed Tests: Impacts on Clinical Laboratory Testing and Patient Care
Description:
ABSTRACT
In October 2023, the U.
S.
Food and Drug Administration (FDA) released a proposed rule to regulate laboratory-developed tests (LDTs) as medical devices.
While approximately 6,700 public comments were submitted during the open comment period, there is not a reliable mechanism to quantify how clinical laboratorians as a sector perceive the proposed rule.
To solicit quantifiable feedback on the FDA’s proposed rule, a ten-item questionnaire was developed and submitted to clinical laboratory customers of ARUP Laboratories, a national nonprofit clinical laboratory of the University of Utah Department of Pathology.
Of 503 clinical laboratory respondents, only 41 (8.
2%) support the FDA’s proposed rule.
66.
9% of respondents work in laboratories that perform LDTs and were therefore asked additional questions regarding the proposed rule.
83.
9% of these respondents believe that the proposed rule will negatively impact their laboratories, while only 3.
0% believe that they have the financial resources to pay for FDA user fees.
60.
9% of respondents anticipate removing tests from their laboratory menus if the proposed rule is enacted, while an additional 33.
2% indicated that they do not yet know.
Only 11.
2% of respondents believe that they would pursue FDA submissions for all of their existing LDTs if the final rule is enacted.
The vast majority of respondents (>80%) were either ‘extremely concerned’ or ‘very concerned’ about the impact of the proposed rule on patient access to essential testing, financial and personnel resources to comply, innovation, the FDA’s ability to implement the proposed rule, and send-out costs and test prices.
Respondents indicated that they would rely heavily on reference laboratory partners for advocacy against the proposed rule, testing options, education, and consultation if the rule was enacted.
Thematic analysis of open comments revealed strong opposition to the proposed rule and significant concern regarding negative impacts to patient care across clinical laboratory settings.
Related Results
Autonomy on Trial
Autonomy on Trial
Photo by CHUTTERSNAP on Unsplash
Abstract
This paper critically examines how US bioethics and health law conceptualize patient autonomy, contrasting the rights-based, individualist...
Provocative Tests in Diagnosis of Thoracic Outlet Syndrome: A Narrative Review
Provocative Tests in Diagnosis of Thoracic Outlet Syndrome: A Narrative Review
Abstract
Thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) is a group of conditions caused by the compression of the neurovascular bundle within the thoracic outlet. It is classified into three main ...
Knowledge and Perceptions of FDA Tobacco Regulation among U.S. Adults in 2015
Knowledge and Perceptions of FDA Tobacco Regulation among U.S. Adults in 2015
Introduction: The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is interested in understanding the factors which influence knowledge and perceptions of the FDA as a credible source for i...
The new U.S. FDA regulations on biocompatibility and reprocessing for medical devices
The new U.S. FDA regulations on biocompatibility and reprocessing for medical devices
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration ("FDA") regulates all medical devices in the United States. As part of its regulatory duties, the FDA provides guidance documents on various r...
Towards more goal-oriented care through care coordination and care planning.
Towards more goal-oriented care through care coordination and care planning.
The increasing aging of our society is putting increasing pressure on the current organization of care and support. This moved the Flemish government to a thorough reform of primar...
AI and Incidental Findings
AI and Incidental Findings
Photo by Accuray on Unsplash
INTRODUCTION
Delayed and missed follow-up on incidental findings threatens patient health and is a major financial risk for healthcare systems. The hea...
SOFTWARE TESTING TECHNIQUES AND PRINCIPLES
SOFTWARE TESTING TECHNIQUES AND PRINCIPLES
This paper describes Software testing, need for software testing, Software testing goals and principles. Further it describe about different Software testing techniques and differe...
Investigating the Food and Drug Administration Biotherapeutics Review and Approval Process: Narrative Review (Preprint)
Investigating the Food and Drug Administration Biotherapeutics Review and Approval Process: Narrative Review (Preprint)
BACKGROUND
The development, review, and approval process of therapeutic biological products in the United States presents two primary challenges: time and c...

