Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Investigating the Function of Artificial Intelligence in Audit Judgement
View through CrossRef
Introduction: Auditors are frequently assigned the responsibility of reviewing intricate financial instruments or assessing the sufficiency of internal controls in light of potential fraud threats. In such circumstances, discernment is necessary to analyse facts, comprehend intent, and evaluate the reliability of answers offered by management. Although AI has demonstrated its disruptive potential across various domains, auditing necessitates a series of intricate and nuanced decisions that demand not only technical study but also human intuition, experience, and ethical considerations.
Objectives: This article explores the role of AI in auditing, focusing on its potential to either replicate or enhance auditor judgment, as well as the challenges that remain in achieving full automation in the auditing process.
Methods: The approach taken in this study is a literature review, which involves gathering, assessing, and analyzing relevant academic works related to the topic. This review contributes to a deeper understanding of how AI is applied in auditing and its effects on auditor decision-making.
Results: AI has the potential to revolutionize the auditing field by automating repetitive tasks, analyzing large volumes of data, and providing data-driven insights. The use of auditor judgment—grounded in experience, context, professional scepticism, and ethical considerations—continues to be a crucial element of auditing. Although AI can aid in data analysis and risk evaluation, it cannot emulate the intricate decision-making process inherent to human auditors. The future of auditing will probably integrate AI-driven tools alongside human discernment, with AI assisting auditors in making better informed and efficient conclusions. AI is expected to collaborate with human auditors, enhancing their judgement instead of supplanting it. By utilising AI technology, auditors may concentrate on advanced decision-making, while AI manages the more mundane elements of data processing and pattern identification.
Conclusions: While it’s unlikely that AI will fully replace the judgment of human auditors, it has the potential to significantly enhance the auditing process. AI can serve as a powerful tool that helps auditors with data analysis, identifying risks, and providing insights that support decision-making. However, human judgment will still be essential in interpreting these insights and drawing final conclusions, taking into account ethical, regulatory, and situational factors.
Science Research Society
Title: Investigating the Function of Artificial Intelligence in Audit Judgement
Description:
Introduction: Auditors are frequently assigned the responsibility of reviewing intricate financial instruments or assessing the sufficiency of internal controls in light of potential fraud threats.
In such circumstances, discernment is necessary to analyse facts, comprehend intent, and evaluate the reliability of answers offered by management.
Although AI has demonstrated its disruptive potential across various domains, auditing necessitates a series of intricate and nuanced decisions that demand not only technical study but also human intuition, experience, and ethical considerations.
Objectives: This article explores the role of AI in auditing, focusing on its potential to either replicate or enhance auditor judgment, as well as the challenges that remain in achieving full automation in the auditing process.
Methods: The approach taken in this study is a literature review, which involves gathering, assessing, and analyzing relevant academic works related to the topic.
This review contributes to a deeper understanding of how AI is applied in auditing and its effects on auditor decision-making.
Results: AI has the potential to revolutionize the auditing field by automating repetitive tasks, analyzing large volumes of data, and providing data-driven insights.
The use of auditor judgment—grounded in experience, context, professional scepticism, and ethical considerations—continues to be a crucial element of auditing.
Although AI can aid in data analysis and risk evaluation, it cannot emulate the intricate decision-making process inherent to human auditors.
The future of auditing will probably integrate AI-driven tools alongside human discernment, with AI assisting auditors in making better informed and efficient conclusions.
AI is expected to collaborate with human auditors, enhancing their judgement instead of supplanting it.
By utilising AI technology, auditors may concentrate on advanced decision-making, while AI manages the more mundane elements of data processing and pattern identification.
Conclusions: While it’s unlikely that AI will fully replace the judgment of human auditors, it has the potential to significantly enhance the auditing process.
AI can serve as a powerful tool that helps auditors with data analysis, identifying risks, and providing insights that support decision-making.
However, human judgment will still be essential in interpreting these insights and drawing final conclusions, taking into account ethical, regulatory, and situational factors.
Related Results
Paper K-9 Pelaporan Hasil Audit dan Tindak Lanjut Audit Internal
Paper K-9 Pelaporan Hasil Audit dan Tindak Lanjut Audit Internal
Pelaporan hasil audit merupakan komponen utama dalam komunikasi dari audit internal tentang hasil audit. Untuk mengkomunikasikan hasil audit diperlukan susunan laporan, dimana hasi...
DETERMINAN FEE AUDIT
DETERMINAN FEE AUDIT
ABSTRACT This study aims to examine the factors that affect audit fees. Factors examined include factors derived from the entity (client) and the factors derived from the auditor....
Pengaruh Audit Tenure, Auditor Switching, dan Opini Audit terhadap Audit Delay
Pengaruh Audit Tenure, Auditor Switching, dan Opini Audit terhadap Audit Delay
Although it is required for go-public companies to report their audited financial statements, some companies do not fulfill their responsibility in a timely manner. This study aims...
Sebuah Jurnal Audit Audit Plan, Audit Program dan Audit Prosedur Pada Harta, Utang dan Modal
Sebuah Jurnal Audit Audit Plan, Audit Program dan Audit Prosedur Pada Harta, Utang dan Modal
Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui bagaimana proses dan prosedur audit plan, audit program dan audit prosedur pada harta, utang dan modal. Penelitian ini juga dimaksudka...
Literature Review Pengaruh Audit Fee, Audit Tenure, Rotasi Audit, Audit Delay, Dan Komite Audit Terhadap Kualitas Audit
Literature Review Pengaruh Audit Fee, Audit Tenure, Rotasi Audit, Audit Delay, Dan Komite Audit Terhadap Kualitas Audit
Masih terdapat hasil audit yang kurang berkualitas dilihat dari kasus-kasus keuangan terdahulu yang melibatkan akuntan publik. Artikel ini mereview faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi ...
THE ROLE OF AUDIT ROTATION, AUDIT COMMITTEE OVERSIGHT, AUDIT CAPACITY STRESS, AND AUDIT TENURE IN DETERMINING AUDIT QUALITY
THE ROLE OF AUDIT ROTATION, AUDIT COMMITTEE OVERSIGHT, AUDIT CAPACITY STRESS, AND AUDIT TENURE IN DETERMINING AUDIT QUALITY
Abstract— The quality of audits is a crucial factor determining the credibility of financial reporting. This research aims to explore the determinants that impact audit quality for...
PENGARUH AUDIT TENURE, UKURAN PERUSAHAAN, AUDIT DELAY, KOMITE AUDIT, DAN ROTASI AUDIT TERHADAP KUALITAS AUDIT
PENGARUH AUDIT TENURE, UKURAN PERUSAHAAN, AUDIT DELAY, KOMITE AUDIT, DAN ROTASI AUDIT TERHADAP KUALITAS AUDIT
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi kualitas audit pada perusahaan sektor keuangan yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia, dengan fokus pada...
Abnormal audit fees and accrual and real earnings management: evidence from UK
Abnormal audit fees and accrual and real earnings management: evidence from UK
Purpose
This paper aims to examine the relationship between abnormal audit fees and accrual-based and real-based earnings management by using a sample of 1,055 UK...

