Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Large-scale Parallel Stratified Defeasible Reasoning
View through CrossRef
We are recently experiencing an unprecedented explosion of available data coming from the Web, sensors readings, scientific databases, government authorities and more. Such datasets could benefit from the introduction of rule sets encoding commonly accepted rules or facts, application- or domain-specific rules, commonsense knowledge etc. This raises the question of whether, how, and to what extent knowledge representation methods are capable of handling huge amounts of data for these applications. In this paper, we consider inconsistency-tolerant reasoning in the form of defeasible logic, and analyze how parallelization, using the MapReduce framework, can be used to reason with defeasible rules over huge datasets. We extend previous work by dealing with predicates of arbitrary arity, under the assumption of stratification. Moving from unary to multi-arity predicates is a decisive step towards practical applications, e.g. reasoning with linked open (RDF) data. Our experimental results demonstrate that defeasible reasoning with millions of data is performant, and has the potential to scale to billions of facts.
Title: Large-scale Parallel Stratified Defeasible Reasoning
Description:
We are recently experiencing an unprecedented explosion of available data coming from the Web, sensors readings, scientific databases, government authorities and more.
Such datasets could benefit from the introduction of rule sets encoding commonly accepted rules or facts, application- or domain-specific rules, commonsense knowledge etc.
This raises the question of whether, how, and to what extent knowledge representation methods are capable of handling huge amounts of data for these applications.
In this paper, we consider inconsistency-tolerant reasoning in the form of defeasible logic, and analyze how parallelization, using the MapReduce framework, can be used to reason with defeasible rules over huge datasets.
We extend previous work by dealing with predicates of arbitrary arity, under the assumption of stratification.
Moving from unary to multi-arity predicates is a decisive step towards practical applications, e.
g.
reasoning with linked open (RDF) data.
Our experimental results demonstrate that defeasible reasoning with millions of data is performant, and has the potential to scale to billions of facts.
Related Results
Logical Challenges in Artificial General Intelligence
Logical Challenges in Artificial General Intelligence
The present thesis pertains to the research area of logic for artificial intelligence (AI), and is motivated by the critical role of automated reasoning in AI, particularly by the ...
Making Quantification Relevant Again —the Case of Defeasible EL⊥
Making Quantification Relevant Again —the Case of Defeasible EL⊥
Defeasible Description Logics (DDLs) extend Description Logics with defeasible concept inclusions. Reasoning in DDLs often employs rational or relevant closure according to the (pr...
Practical Reasoning for Defeasible Description Logics
Practical Reasoning for Defeasible Description Logics
Description Logics (DLs) are a family of logic-based languages for formalisingontologies. They have useful computational properties allowing the developmentof automated reasoning e...
Characteristics and processes of registered nurses’ clinical reasoning and factors relating to the use of clinical reasoning in practice: a scoping review
Characteristics and processes of registered nurses’ clinical reasoning and factors relating to the use of clinical reasoning in practice: a scoping review
Objective:
The objective of this review was to examine the characteristics and processes of clinical reasoning used by registered nurses in clinical practice, and to id...
A logic of defeasible argumentation: Constructing arguments in justification logic
A logic of defeasible argumentation: Constructing arguments in justification logic
In the 1980s, Pollock’s work on default reasons started the quest in the AI community for a formal system of defeasible argumentation. The main goal of this paper is to provide a l...
A characterization of collective conflict for defeasible argumentation
A characterization of collective conflict for defeasible argumentation
In this paper we define a recursive semantics for warrant in a general defeasible argumentation framework by formalizing a notion of collective (non-binary) conflict among argument...
How Large Language Models Can Affect Clinical Reasoning: A Randomized Clinical Trial
How Large Language Models Can Affect Clinical Reasoning: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Abstract
Importance
LLMs have encoded a vast array of medical knowledge and are being integrated into clinical settings as deci...
Deontic meta-rules
Deontic meta-rules
Abstract
The use of meta-rules in logic, i.e., rules whose content includes other rules, has recently gained attention in the setting of non-monotonic reasoning: a f...

