Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Struggle over Human Rights

View through CrossRef
The Struggle over Human Rights: The Non-Aligned Movement, Jimmy Carter, and Neoliberalism traces the origins of the relationship between neoliberalism and the modern doctrine of human rights to the 1970s. It uses empirical evidence to prove that the Carter administration transformed the U.S., and the traditional Western liberal approach to human rights, in response, in part, to the actions of the Non-Aligned Movement. The New International Economic Order (NIEO), a high-point in Non-Aligned solidarity, placed pressures on the power relations of the international system and sought to advance the social and economic rights of the Third World. Carter’s transformation promoted civil and political rights as the only acceptable “human” rights and relegated economic rights to a “basic needs” approach, undercutting welfare state principles in the U.S. and in the newly emergent independent states in Africa, Asia, and the Pacific. This doctrine, as the book highlights through extensive archival research, sharpened the definition of international human rights to serve the maintenance of the U.S.-led world order. Carter’s diplomatic use of human rights obfuscated exploitative economic structures and paved the way for an aggressive neoliberal transformation through World Bank and IMF Structural Adjustment Programs under Reagan. Historical studies of human rights have ignored these connections, making this book a unique contribution to the scholarship of human rights.
The Rowman & Littlefield Group
Title: Struggle over Human Rights
Description:
The Struggle over Human Rights: The Non-Aligned Movement, Jimmy Carter, and Neoliberalism traces the origins of the relationship between neoliberalism and the modern doctrine of human rights to the 1970s.
It uses empirical evidence to prove that the Carter administration transformed the U.
S.
, and the traditional Western liberal approach to human rights, in response, in part, to the actions of the Non-Aligned Movement.
The New International Economic Order (NIEO), a high-point in Non-Aligned solidarity, placed pressures on the power relations of the international system and sought to advance the social and economic rights of the Third World.
Carter’s transformation promoted civil and political rights as the only acceptable “human” rights and relegated economic rights to a “basic needs” approach, undercutting welfare state principles in the U.
S.
and in the newly emergent independent states in Africa, Asia, and the Pacific.
This doctrine, as the book highlights through extensive archival research, sharpened the definition of international human rights to serve the maintenance of the U.
S.
-led world order.
Carter’s diplomatic use of human rights obfuscated exploitative economic structures and paved the way for an aggressive neoliberal transformation through World Bank and IMF Structural Adjustment Programs under Reagan.
Historical studies of human rights have ignored these connections, making this book a unique contribution to the scholarship of human rights.

Related Results

Human Rights and Legal Judgments
Human Rights and Legal Judgments
Human rights can be defined as the basic fundamental rights inherent to all human beings in any society. How these rights are made available and protected in individual countries i...
Fundamental Rights in EU Internal Market Legislation
Fundamental Rights in EU Internal Market Legislation
This book attempts to systematise the present interrelationship between fundamental rights and the EU internal market in the field of positive integration. Its intention is simple:...
Minority Rights in the Pacific Region
Minority Rights in the Pacific Region
The book examines the extent to which States in the Pacific region have put in place legislative and administrative measures designed to promote and protect the rights of minoritie...
EU’s Human Rights Responsibility Gap
EU’s Human Rights Responsibility Gap
Can the EU be held legally responsible for its contributions to human rights harms in its Integrated Border Management policy? Or do systemic legal design flaws in the EU's human r...
Revisiting the Origins of Human Rights
Revisiting the Origins of Human Rights
Did the history of human rights begin decades, centuries or even millennia ago? What constitutes this history? And what can we really learn from 'the textbook narrative&am...
Human Rights in Graphic Life Narrative
Human Rights in Graphic Life Narrative
Surveying print and digital graphic life narratives about migrants, refugees and asylum seekers, this book investigates how comics and graphic novels witness human rights transgres...
Carter ’s Human Rights Campaign
Carter ’s Human Rights Campaign
This chapter examines Jimmy Carter's promotion of human rights abroad as part of his foreign policy. The Carter administration gave a relatively precise interpretation of the meani...
Between Desire and Reason
Between Desire and Reason
Respect for and promotion of human rights have come to be seen as the basis of legitimacy of modern Western civilization. There is nevertheless a striking contrast between our comm...

Back to Top