Javascript must be enabled to continue!
A Plea for Restraint
View through CrossRef
This essay reconstructs Hedley Bull’s position on nuclear proliferation in The Anarchical Society. Avoiding the extremes of nuclear optimism and pessimism, Bull provided nuanced arguments about the relationship between nuclear proliferation and international order. Bull remained agnostic as to what the world of many nuclear powers would look like. He used this unpredictability to emphasize the notion of restraint involving both superpower cooperation to prevent states from going nuclear as well as the exercise of self-restraint on the part of superpowers. Showing restraint was crucial to the continued existence of the states system. Bull worried that proliferation represented a particular threat to it. Nuclear weapons exposed states to the prospect of sudden and complete destruction. This could lead to the abolition of the state system and its replacement with world government, to which Bull was strongly opposed. The conclusion illustrates Bull’s relevance in relation to the recent pursuit of non-proliferation.
Title: A Plea for Restraint
Description:
This essay reconstructs Hedley Bull’s position on nuclear proliferation in The Anarchical Society.
Avoiding the extremes of nuclear optimism and pessimism, Bull provided nuanced arguments about the relationship between nuclear proliferation and international order.
Bull remained agnostic as to what the world of many nuclear powers would look like.
He used this unpredictability to emphasize the notion of restraint involving both superpower cooperation to prevent states from going nuclear as well as the exercise of self-restraint on the part of superpowers.
Showing restraint was crucial to the continued existence of the states system.
Bull worried that proliferation represented a particular threat to it.
Nuclear weapons exposed states to the prospect of sudden and complete destruction.
This could lead to the abolition of the state system and its replacement with world government, to which Bull was strongly opposed.
The conclusion illustrates Bull’s relevance in relation to the recent pursuit of non-proliferation.
Related Results
35th PLEA Conference on Passive and Low Energy Architecture (PLEA 2020).
35th PLEA Conference on Passive and Low Energy Architecture (PLEA 2020).
These three volumes contain the proceedings of the 35th PLEA Conference on Passive and Low Energy Architecture (PLEA 2020). Planning Post Carbon Cities, held in A Coruña from 1 to...
Rethinking Investment Law
Rethinking Investment Law
Abstract
The rules and enforcement mechanisms of investment law and arbitration reach deep into the regulatory and policy space of host states; tribunals have the ab...
A plea for art in the house
A plea for art in the house
with special reference to the economy of collecting works of art, and the importance of taste in education and morals., W. J. Loftie...
Commands in Wolaitta
Commands in Wolaitta
This chapter examines expressions of commands (imperatives) in Wolaitta and the ways in which the imperative is distinguished from statements and questions. Although each sentence ...
Nerva as Supreme Military Commander
Nerva as Supreme Military Commander
As Nerva’s coinage has been studied almost exclusively with historical hindsight, and with the biases of later historians in mind, there is an impulse to read Nerva’s “weak” charac...
Kames and the Argument from Perceptual Reliability
Kames and the Argument from Perceptual Reliability
Critic and cousin to David Hume, Henry Home (1696–1782)—or Lord Kames, as he was known after his appointment to the Court of Session in 1752—had remarkably varied intellectual inte...
Sentencing and Sanctions in Western Countries
Sentencing and Sanctions in Western Countries
Abstract
This collection of original essays surveys the evolution of sentencing policies and practices in Western countries over the past twenty-five years. The volu...


