Javascript must be enabled to continue!
General Practitioners’ Perspectives and Barriers to Deprescribing Inappropriate Medications in Primary Care
View through CrossRef
Introduction and objective: Potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP) is associated with adverse drug reactions and negative outcomes in older adults. The objective of the study was to assess the reasons expressed by General Practitioner’s (GPs) to maintain their patients' PIP or the barriers to deprescribe. Material and Methods: a mixed quantitative-qualitative study to explore the GPs’ decisions and perspectives about reviewing PIP that were notified to GPs by an alert system (AS-PIP). The AS-PIP allowed GPs to send feedback information about the barriers for treatment modification, deprescribing or circumstances that were considered when taking the decision about not make any change in the medication schedule. Five types of PIP were selected. Patient reports with PIP were sent to GPs in two phases (April/2016 and July/2016). Theoretical Domains Framework was employed to classify GPs’ opinions and barriers on maintaining PIP. GPs’ feedback frequency, total and according to type of medication with PIP, and frequency distribution among main reasons recorded by GPs justifying their decision after reviewing PIP were calculated. Percentage reductions for each PIP were also evaluated. Results: The main reasons given by GPs to explain why they continued to prescribe potentially inappropriate medication were: another physician originally issued the prescription; patients had good or bad control of their illness; and the treatment was not a potential risk to the patient. The most significant views were coded into 5 domains: (i) knowledge, (ii) social/professional role and identity,(iii) beliefs about capabilities, (iv) memory, attention and decision processes, and (v) social influences. Conclusions: The study highlights the reasons given by GPs for maintaining PIP. The process of deprescribing seems to lace with many challenges for GPs. The most relevant views are associated with no update in therapeutic knowledge, social pressure or influences, and lack of professional leadership
SciVision Publishers LLC
Title: General Practitioners’ Perspectives and Barriers to Deprescribing Inappropriate Medications in Primary Care
Description:
Introduction and objective: Potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP) is associated with adverse drug reactions and negative outcomes in older adults.
The objective of the study was to assess the reasons expressed by General Practitioner’s (GPs) to maintain their patients' PIP or the barriers to deprescribe.
Material and Methods: a mixed quantitative-qualitative study to explore the GPs’ decisions and perspectives about reviewing PIP that were notified to GPs by an alert system (AS-PIP).
The AS-PIP allowed GPs to send feedback information about the barriers for treatment modification, deprescribing or circumstances that were considered when taking the decision about not make any change in the medication schedule.
Five types of PIP were selected.
Patient reports with PIP were sent to GPs in two phases (April/2016 and July/2016).
Theoretical Domains Framework was employed to classify GPs’ opinions and barriers on maintaining PIP.
GPs’ feedback frequency, total and according to type of medication with PIP, and frequency distribution among main reasons recorded by GPs justifying their decision after reviewing PIP were calculated.
Percentage reductions for each PIP were also evaluated.
Results: The main reasons given by GPs to explain why they continued to prescribe potentially inappropriate medication were: another physician originally issued the prescription; patients had good or bad control of their illness; and the treatment was not a potential risk to the patient.
The most significant views were coded into 5 domains: (i) knowledge, (ii) social/professional role and identity,(iii) beliefs about capabilities, (iv) memory, attention and decision processes, and (v) social influences.
Conclusions: The study highlights the reasons given by GPs for maintaining PIP.
The process of deprescribing seems to lace with many challenges for GPs.
The most relevant views are associated with no update in therapeutic knowledge, social pressure or influences, and lack of professional leadership.
Related Results
PHARMACISTS’ BEHAVIOR TOWARDS PATIENT CENTERED CARE AND THE NEED FOR DEPRESCRIBING: A CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY
PHARMACISTS’ BEHAVIOR TOWARDS PATIENT CENTERED CARE AND THE NEED FOR DEPRESCRIBING: A CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY
Background: Patient-centered care emphasizes collaboration with patients to ensure that healthcare decisions align with their preferences, goals and clinical needs. Within this fra...
Exploring Barriers and Facilitators to Deprescribing Psychotropics in Child and Adolescent Psychiatry: A Qualitative Study from India
Exploring Barriers and Facilitators to Deprescribing Psychotropics in Child and Adolescent Psychiatry: A Qualitative Study from India
Background:
Deprescribing, a structured, planned, and supervised approach to medication discontinuation, is increasingly recognized as an imperative rather than...
Artificial intelligence tool utilization in deprescribing practices among community pharmacists in Jordan: a cross-sectional study
Artificial intelligence tool utilization in deprescribing practices among community pharmacists in Jordan: a cross-sectional study
Introduction
Data on artificial intelligence-supported deprescribing in Jordanian community pharmacy are still lacking. This study aimed to assess current depre...
Enablers and barriers to community pharmacists’ readiness to implement deprescribing of inappropriate medications for older adults in Qatar
Enablers and barriers to community pharmacists’ readiness to implement deprescribing of inappropriate medications for older adults in Qatar
There is paucity of studies focused on the enablers and barriers to community pharmacists’ readiness to deprescribe inappropriate medications for older adults in developing setting...
Organisatie van geestelijke gezondheidszorg voor mensen met een ernstige en persisterende mentale aandoening
Organisatie van geestelijke gezondheidszorg voor mensen met een ernstige en persisterende mentale aandoening
1 INTRODUCTION AND RESEARCH QUESTIONS 5 -- 2 GENERAL BACKGROUND: DEFINITIONS AND SCOPE OF THE STUDY 7 -- 2.1 CHRONIC AND COMPLEX MENTAL DISORDERS: DEFINITIONS AND SCOPE OF THE -- S...
Patient harm from cardiovascular medications
Patient harm from cardiovascular medications
Background
Medication harm can lead to hospital admission, prolonged hospital stay and poor patient outcomes. Reducing medication harm is a priority for healthc...
Deprescribing: An umbrella review
Deprescribing: An umbrella review
Abstract
This umbrella review examined systematic reviews of deprescribing studies by characteristics of intervention, population, medicine, ...
NAVIGATING POLYPHARMACY IN AGING POPULATIONS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF DEPRESCRIBING INTERVENTIONS AND ITS IMPACT ON CLINICAL OUTCOMES
NAVIGATING POLYPHARMACY IN AGING POPULATIONS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF DEPRESCRIBING INTERVENTIONS AND ITS IMPACT ON CLINICAL OUTCOMES
Background: Polypharmacy, prescription of five or more drugs, is common in geriatric care and has been linked to increased risk of adverse drug reactions (ADRs), hospitalization, a...

