Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

General Practitioners’ Perspectives and Barriers to Deprescribing Inappropriate Medications in Primary Care

View through CrossRef
Introduction and objective: Potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP) is associated with adverse drug reactions and negative outcomes in older adults. The objective of the study was to assess the reasons expressed by General Practitioner’s (GPs) to maintain their patients' PIP or the barriers to deprescribe. Material and Methods: a mixed quantitative-qualitative study to explore the GPs’ decisions and perspectives about reviewing PIP that were notified to GPs by an alert system (AS-PIP). The AS-PIP allowed GPs to send feedback information about the barriers for treatment modification, deprescribing or circumstances that were considered when taking the decision about not make any change in the medication schedule. Five types of PIP were selected. Patient reports with PIP were sent to GPs in two phases (April/2016 and July/2016). Theoretical Domains Framework was employed to classify GPs’ opinions and barriers on maintaining PIP. GPs’ feedback frequency, total and according to type of medication with PIP, and frequency distribution among main reasons recorded by GPs justifying their decision after reviewing PIP were calculated. Percentage reductions for each PIP were also evaluated. Results: The main reasons given by GPs to explain why they continued to prescribe potentially inappropriate medication were: another physician originally issued the prescription; patients had good or bad control of their illness; and the treatment was not a potential risk to the patient. The most significant views were coded into 5 domains: (i) knowledge, (ii) social/professional role and identity,(iii) beliefs about capabilities, (iv) memory, attention and decision processes, and (v) social influences. Conclusions: The study highlights the reasons given by GPs for maintaining PIP. The process of deprescribing seems to lace with many challenges for GPs. The most relevant views are associated with no update in therapeutic knowledge, social pressure or influences, and lack of professional leadership
Title: General Practitioners’ Perspectives and Barriers to Deprescribing Inappropriate Medications in Primary Care
Description:
Introduction and objective: Potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP) is associated with adverse drug reactions and negative outcomes in older adults.
The objective of the study was to assess the reasons expressed by General Practitioner’s (GPs) to maintain their patients' PIP or the barriers to deprescribe.
Material and Methods: a mixed quantitative-qualitative study to explore the GPs’ decisions and perspectives about reviewing PIP that were notified to GPs by an alert system (AS-PIP).
The AS-PIP allowed GPs to send feedback information about the barriers for treatment modification, deprescribing or circumstances that were considered when taking the decision about not make any change in the medication schedule.
Five types of PIP were selected.
Patient reports with PIP were sent to GPs in two phases (April/2016 and July/2016).
Theoretical Domains Framework was employed to classify GPs’ opinions and barriers on maintaining PIP.
GPs’ feedback frequency, total and according to type of medication with PIP, and frequency distribution among main reasons recorded by GPs justifying their decision after reviewing PIP were calculated.
Percentage reductions for each PIP were also evaluated.
Results: The main reasons given by GPs to explain why they continued to prescribe potentially inappropriate medication were: another physician originally issued the prescription; patients had good or bad control of their illness; and the treatment was not a potential risk to the patient.
The most significant views were coded into 5 domains: (i) knowledge, (ii) social/professional role and identity,(iii) beliefs about capabilities, (iv) memory, attention and decision processes, and (v) social influences.
Conclusions: The study highlights the reasons given by GPs for maintaining PIP.
The process of deprescribing seems to lace with many challenges for GPs.
The most relevant views are associated with no update in therapeutic knowledge, social pressure or influences, and lack of professional leadership.

Related Results

NAVIGATING POLYPHARMACY IN AGING POPULATIONS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF DEPRESCRIBING INTERVENTIONS AND ITS IMPACT ON CLINICAL OUTCOMES
NAVIGATING POLYPHARMACY IN AGING POPULATIONS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF DEPRESCRIBING INTERVENTIONS AND ITS IMPACT ON CLINICAL OUTCOMES
Background: Polypharmacy, prescription of five or more drugs, is common in geriatric care and has been linked to increased risk of adverse drug reactions (ADRs), hospitalization, a...
Attitudes of older patients and caregivers towards deprescribing of medications in Ethiopia
Attitudes of older patients and caregivers towards deprescribing of medications in Ethiopia
Abstract Background: Deprescribing as the part of optimal health care is aimed at reducing the overall impact of polypharmacy on patients and health care services. Understa...
A Review on Deprescribing in Elderly
A Review on Deprescribing in Elderly
Deprescribing can be defined as the process of stopping a medication or reducing its dose to reduce adverse effects and improve health outcomes. Elderly people with co morbidities ...
Smart Deprescribing Algorithms as a Strategy to Optimize Medication Safety and Reduce Drug–Drug Interactions
Smart Deprescribing Algorithms as a Strategy to Optimize Medication Safety and Reduce Drug–Drug Interactions
Clinically significant drug–drug interactions (DDIs) remain a major source of preventable harm in modern pharmacotherapy, particularly in patients exposed to polypharmacy and compl...
Effective deprescribing in primary care without deterioration of health-related outcomes
Effective deprescribing in primary care without deterioration of health-related outcomes
Medication reviews focusing on deprescribing can reduce potentially inappropriate medication; however, evidence regarding the effects on health-related outcomes is scares. In a rea...
Accuracy of the Screening Tool for Autism in Toddlers and Young Children in the primary care setting
Accuracy of the Screening Tool for Autism in Toddlers and Young Children in the primary care setting
Feasible and accurate assessment tools developed for non-specialists are needed to scale community-based models of autism evaluation. The purpose of this study was to evaluate use ...
Deprescribing Antipsychotic Medications
Deprescribing Antipsychotic Medications
Abstract This chapter discusses some of reasons for considering a deprescribing intervention with neuroleptic medications, including clear instances such as irration...
Deprescribing interventions for gabapentinoids in adults: a scoping review
Deprescribing interventions for gabapentinoids in adults: a scoping review
The emerging issue of rising gabapentinoid misuse is being recognised alongside the lack of current evidence supporting the safe and effective deprescribing of gabapentinoids. This...

Back to Top