Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Newly found sunspot observations by Peter Becker from Rostock for 1708, 1709, and 1710
View through CrossRef
AbstractWe present a few newly found old sunspot observations from the years AD 1708, 1709, and 1710, which were obtained by Peter Becker from Rostock, Germany. For 1709, Becker gave a detailed drawing: he observed a sunspot group made up of two spots on January 5, 6, and 7, and just one of the two spots was observed on January 8 and 9. We present his drawing and his explanatory text. We can measure the latitude and longitude of these two spots and estimate their sizes for all five days. While the spots and groups in 1708 and the spot on four of the five days in January 1709 were known before from other observers (e.g. Hoyt & Schatten 1998), the location of the spots in early January 1709 were not known before, so that they can now be considered in reconstructed butterfly diagrams. The sunspots detected by Becker on 1709 January 5 and 1710 September 10 were not known before at all, as the only observer known for those two dates, La Hire, did not detect that spot (group). We estimate new group sunspot numbers for the relevant days, months, and years. The time around 1708–1710 is important, because it documents the recovery of solar activity towards the end of the Maunder Grand Minimum. We also show two new spot observations from G. Kirch for 1708 September 13 and 14 as described in his letter to Wurzelbaur (dated Berlin AD 1708 December 19). (© 2015 WILEY‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim)
Title: Newly found sunspot observations by Peter Becker from Rostock for 1708, 1709, and 1710
Description:
AbstractWe present a few newly found old sunspot observations from the years AD 1708, 1709, and 1710, which were obtained by Peter Becker from Rostock, Germany.
For 1709, Becker gave a detailed drawing: he observed a sunspot group made up of two spots on January 5, 6, and 7, and just one of the two spots was observed on January 8 and 9.
We present his drawing and his explanatory text.
We can measure the latitude and longitude of these two spots and estimate their sizes for all five days.
While the spots and groups in 1708 and the spot on four of the five days in January 1709 were known before from other observers (e.
g.
Hoyt & Schatten 1998), the location of the spots in early January 1709 were not known before, so that they can now be considered in reconstructed butterfly diagrams.
The sunspots detected by Becker on 1709 January 5 and 1710 September 10 were not known before at all, as the only observer known for those two dates, La Hire, did not detect that spot (group).
We estimate new group sunspot numbers for the relevant days, months, and years.
The time around 1708–1710 is important, because it documents the recovery of solar activity towards the end of the Maunder Grand Minimum.
We also show two new spot observations from G.
Kirch for 1708 September 13 and 14 as described in his letter to Wurzelbaur (dated Berlin AD 1708 December 19).
(© 2015 WILEY‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co.
KGaA, Weinheim).
Related Results
Prediction of even and odd sunspot cycles: implications for cycles 25 and 2
Prediction of even and odd sunspot cycles: implications for cycles 25 and 2
Prediction of sunspots has been an everlasting interest in the space science community since the discovery of the sunspot cycle. The sunspot number is an indirect indicator of many...
Rudolf Wolf to Alfred Wolfer: The Transfer of the Reference Observer in the International Sunspot Number Series (1876–1893)
Rudolf Wolf to Alfred Wolfer: The Transfer of the Reference Observer in the International Sunspot Number Series (1876–1893)
Abstract
In 1876, Alfred Wolfer started observing the Sun and recording properties of sunspots alongside Rudolf Wolf. Their observations became the basis for the constructi...
Prediction of even and odd sunspot cycles
Prediction of even and odd sunspot cycles
Abstract
Here we study the prediction of even and odd numbered sunspot cycles separately, thereby taking into account the Hale cyclicity of solar magnetism. We first show t...
Do the sunspot numbers form a “chaotic” set?
Do the sunspot numbers form a “chaotic” set?
The problem of predicting future cycles of the sunspot number is physically significant. Recently, a number of authors have made complex systems analyses (“chaos”) of the set of mo...
Sunspot observations by Hisako Koyama: 1945–1996
Sunspot observations by Hisako Koyama: 1945–1996
ABSTRACT
Sunspot records are the only observational tracer of solar activity that provides a fundamental, multicentury reference. Its homogeneity has been largely ma...
Sunspot Observations at the Eimmart Observatory: Revision and Supplement
Sunspot Observations at the Eimmart Observatory: Revision and Supplement
Abstract
Digital images of sunspot drawings of the archives of Georg Christoph Eimmart stored at the National Library of Russia are analyzed to obtain sunspot group numbers...
Sunspot Observations at the Eimmart Observatory: Revision and Supplement
Sunspot Observations at the Eimmart Observatory: Revision and Supplement
Abstract
Digital images of sunspot drawings of the archives of Georg Christoph Eimmart stored at the National Library of Russia, St. Petersbu...
Dr. Peter Emil Becker and the Third Reich: Correspondence
Dr. Peter Emil Becker and the Third Reich: Correspondence
ABSTRACT
Peter Emil Becker was a German neurologist who is remembered for his studies of muscular dystrophies. Becker muscular dystrophy and ...

