Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Repeatability and comparison of Corvis ST parameters before and after accelerated transepithelial corneal cross-linking in keratoconus eyes

View through CrossRef
AIM: To evaluate the repeatability and comparison of corneal visualization scheimpflug technology (Corvis ST) parameters in keratoconus eyes before and after accelerated transepithelial corneal cross-linking (ATE-CXL). METHODS: Thirty eyes of 30 progressive keratoconus patients were included in the prospective study. Three repeated corneal biomechanical measurements were performed preoperatively and one month postoperatively by Corvis ST. The interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and 95% confidence interval (CI), Cronbach’ α, repeatability coefficient (RC), and coefficient of variation (CV) were used to evaluate the repeatability of Corvis ST parameters. Paired t test or Wilcoxon rank test was used to evaluate the differences between preoperative and postoperative data. RESULTS: At preoperative, 26 of 39 (66.67%) parameters showed good to excellent repeatability, 6 (15.38%) showed moderate, and 7 (17.95%) showed poor repeatability. Similarly, 34 (87.18%) parameters showed good to excellent repeatability, 3 (7.69%) showed moderate, and 2 (5.13%) showed poor repeatability after ATE-CXL. After ATE-CXL 1mo, the intraocular pressure (IOP), biomechanical corrected IOP (bIOP), first applanation time (A1T), Radius, deformation amplitude at the first applanation (A1DA), deflection length at the maximum deformation (HCDLL) and stiffness parameter at first applanation (SP A1) parameters increased, while the steep keratometry (Ks), flat keratometry (Kf), mean keratometry (Kmean), second applanation time (A2T), DA Ratio Max (2 mm) and integrated radius parameters decreased (all P<0.05). CONCLUSION: The repeatability of the Corvis ST parameters before and 1mo ATE-CXL follow up were both acceptable, and the corneal stiffness was improved after 1-month ATE-CXL.
Title: Repeatability and comparison of Corvis ST parameters before and after accelerated transepithelial corneal cross-linking in keratoconus eyes
Description:
AIM: To evaluate the repeatability and comparison of corneal visualization scheimpflug technology (Corvis ST) parameters in keratoconus eyes before and after accelerated transepithelial corneal cross-linking (ATE-CXL).
METHODS: Thirty eyes of 30 progressive keratoconus patients were included in the prospective study.
Three repeated corneal biomechanical measurements were performed preoperatively and one month postoperatively by Corvis ST.
The interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and 95% confidence interval (CI), Cronbach’ α, repeatability coefficient (RC), and coefficient of variation (CV) were used to evaluate the repeatability of Corvis ST parameters.
Paired t test or Wilcoxon rank test was used to evaluate the differences between preoperative and postoperative data.
RESULTS: At preoperative, 26 of 39 (66.
67%) parameters showed good to excellent repeatability, 6 (15.
38%) showed moderate, and 7 (17.
95%) showed poor repeatability.
Similarly, 34 (87.
18%) parameters showed good to excellent repeatability, 3 (7.
69%) showed moderate, and 2 (5.
13%) showed poor repeatability after ATE-CXL.
After ATE-CXL 1mo, the intraocular pressure (IOP), biomechanical corrected IOP (bIOP), first applanation time (A1T), Radius, deformation amplitude at the first applanation (A1DA), deflection length at the maximum deformation (HCDLL) and stiffness parameter at first applanation (SP A1) parameters increased, while the steep keratometry (Ks), flat keratometry (Kf), mean keratometry (Kmean), second applanation time (A2T), DA Ratio Max (2 mm) and integrated radius parameters decreased (all P<0.
05).
CONCLUSION: The repeatability of the Corvis ST parameters before and 1mo ATE-CXL follow up were both acceptable, and the corneal stiffness was improved after 1-month ATE-CXL.

Related Results

Corneal Deformation Response in Patients With keratoconus and in Healthy Subjects
Corneal Deformation Response in Patients With keratoconus and in Healthy Subjects
Abstract Background To compare the corneal deformation response between patients with keratoconus and healthy subjects and to identify potential characteristics associated...
Comparison of corneal biological parameters between transepithelial and epithelium-off corneal cross-linking in keratoconus
Comparison of corneal biological parameters between transepithelial and epithelium-off corneal cross-linking in keratoconus
AIM: To evaluate the differences in corneal biological parameters between transepithelial and epithelium-off corneal cross-linking in keratoconus. METHODS: In our prospective clini...
Effects of collagen cross-linking on corneal topographic characteristics in the patients with keratoconus
Effects of collagen cross-linking on corneal topographic characteristics in the patients with keratoconus
Background: Keratoconus is a bilateral, non-inflammatory, progressive disorder characterized by corneal thinning and protrusion, progressive myopia, and irregular astigmatism. Avai...
Proteases, proteolysis and inflammatory molecules in the tears of people with keratoconus
Proteases, proteolysis and inflammatory molecules in the tears of people with keratoconus
Abstract.Purpose:  To investigate the expression of proteases, proteolytic activity and cytokines in the tear film of people with keratoconus.Methods:  Basal tears from people with...
An Exploratory Analysis of Forme Fruste Keratoconus Sensitivity Diagnostic Parameters
An Exploratory Analysis of Forme Fruste Keratoconus Sensitivity Diagnostic Parameters
Abstract Purpose: To re-statistical analysis of the Pentacam or Corvis ST parameters from literatures, and to obtain more sensitive diagnostic parameters for clinical kerat...
Repeatability and reproducibility of Keratograph 5M corneal topography
Repeatability and reproducibility of Keratograph 5M corneal topography
Background Corneal topography is an important diagnostic tool and highly repeatable and reproducible topographic devices are essential in eye care practice. Placido ...

Back to Top