Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Challenges in shared decision-making about major lower limb amputation: the PERCEIVE qualitative study
View through CrossRef
Objectives
Shared decision-making is widely advocated in policy and practice, but how it is to be applied in a high-stakes clinical decision such as major lower limb amputation due to chronic limb-threatening ischaemia or diabetic foot is unclear. The aim of this study was to explore the communication, consent, risk prediction and decision-making process in relation to major lower limb amputation.
Design
A qualitative study (done as part of a broader mixed-methods study) using
s
emi-structured interviews. Interview transcriptions were analysed using thematic analysis.
Setting
Vascular centres in three large National Health Service hospitals in Wales and England, UK, between 1 October 2020 and 30 September 2022.
Participants
A purposive sample of 18 patients for whom major lower limb amputation was considered as a treatment option/carried out, with interviews conducted before or within 4 months of amputation and 4–6 months after amputation. A further purposive sample of 20 healthcare professionals (including eight surgeons) involved in supporting or conducting major lower limb amputation decision-making.
Findings
Five major categories were identified that highlighted the challenges of ensuring shared decision-making associated with major lower limb amputation: (i) patients’ limited understanding, (ii) variable patient attitudes to decision-making, (iii) healthcare professionals’ perceived challenges to sharing decision-making, (iv) surgeons’ paternalism and (v) patients’ and healthcare professionals’ decisional regret/possible consequences of challenges.
Conclusion
Amputation is a life-changing decision for both patients and healthcare professionals, with huge consequences. Despite being considered the gold standard, our findings highlight several challenges to effective shared decision-making for major lower limb amputation. Shared decision-making training for healthcare professionals is paramount if these limitations are to be addressed and patients are to feel confident in being adequately informed about the treatment decisions that they make.
Trial registration number
NCT04903756
.
Title: Challenges in shared decision-making about major lower limb amputation: the PERCEIVE qualitative study
Description:
Objectives
Shared decision-making is widely advocated in policy and practice, but how it is to be applied in a high-stakes clinical decision such as major lower limb amputation due to chronic limb-threatening ischaemia or diabetic foot is unclear.
The aim of this study was to explore the communication, consent, risk prediction and decision-making process in relation to major lower limb amputation.
Design
A qualitative study (done as part of a broader mixed-methods study) using
s
emi-structured interviews.
Interview transcriptions were analysed using thematic analysis.
Setting
Vascular centres in three large National Health Service hospitals in Wales and England, UK, between 1 October 2020 and 30 September 2022.
Participants
A purposive sample of 18 patients for whom major lower limb amputation was considered as a treatment option/carried out, with interviews conducted before or within 4 months of amputation and 4–6 months after amputation.
A further purposive sample of 20 healthcare professionals (including eight surgeons) involved in supporting or conducting major lower limb amputation decision-making.
Findings
Five major categories were identified that highlighted the challenges of ensuring shared decision-making associated with major lower limb amputation: (i) patients’ limited understanding, (ii) variable patient attitudes to decision-making, (iii) healthcare professionals’ perceived challenges to sharing decision-making, (iv) surgeons’ paternalism and (v) patients’ and healthcare professionals’ decisional regret/possible consequences of challenges.
Conclusion
Amputation is a life-changing decision for both patients and healthcare professionals, with huge consequences.
Despite being considered the gold standard, our findings highlight several challenges to effective shared decision-making for major lower limb amputation.
Shared decision-making training for healthcare professionals is paramount if these limitations are to be addressed and patients are to feel confident in being adequately informed about the treatment decisions that they make.
Trial registration number
NCT04903756
.
Related Results
FACTORS THAT INFLUENCE THE USAGE OF PROSTHESES AMONG PERSONS WITH LOWER LIMB AMPUTATION IN THE KUMASI METROPOLIS
FACTORS THAT INFLUENCE THE USAGE OF PROSTHESES AMONG PERSONS WITH LOWER LIMB AMPUTATION IN THE KUMASI METROPOLIS
There has been numerous technological advancements in dealing with major etiologies of lower limb amputation but lower limb amputation has been on the rise. According to Amoah et a...
Autonomy on Trial
Autonomy on Trial
Photo by CHUTTERSNAP on Unsplash
Abstract
This paper critically examines how US bioethics and health law conceptualize patient autonomy, contrasting the rights-based, individualist...
Amputação Parcial de Membro e Adaptação Protética em Égua Puro-Sangue Inglês
Amputação Parcial de Membro e Adaptação Protética em Égua Puro-Sangue Inglês
Background: Traditionally, severe limb injuries in horses often result in euthanasia. However, advancements in veterinary medicine allow for the treatment and rehabilitation of man...
Gaps in Vascular Evaluation Before Major Lower-Extremity Amputation Among Medicare Beneficiaries With Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia
Gaps in Vascular Evaluation Before Major Lower-Extremity Amputation Among Medicare Beneficiaries With Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia
ABSTRACT
Background
Guidelines recommend vascular specialist evaluation and revascularization consideration before major amputa...
Body image and perception among adults with and without phantom limb pain
Body image and perception among adults with and without phantom limb pain
AbstractBackgroundFollowing lower‐limb amputation, phantom limb pain (i.e., pain perceived as coming from the amputated portion of the limb) is common. Phantom limb pain may be ass...
The frequency and Risk Factors of Re-amputation in Diabetic Foot Disease at a tertiary care hospital.
The frequency and Risk Factors of Re-amputation in Diabetic Foot Disease at a tertiary care hospital.
Introduction: The prevalence of diabetes in Pakistan is 11.7% and the preva-lence of diabetic foot in Pakistan is 13.9% with amputation rate of as high as 48%. Re-amputation carrie...
PrEdiction of Risk and Communication of outcomE followIng major lower limb amputation: a collaboratiVE study (PERCEIVE)—protocol for the PERCEIVE qualitative study
PrEdiction of Risk and Communication of outcomE followIng major lower limb amputation: a collaboratiVE study (PERCEIVE)—protocol for the PERCEIVE qualitative study
Introduction
Deciding whether to proceed with a major lower limb amputation is life-changing and complex, and it is crucial that the right decision is made at the...
LIMB SALVAGE SURGERY COMPARED TO AMPUTATION IN BONE AND SOFT TISSUE TUMORS: A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF CURRENT EVIDENCE
LIMB SALVAGE SURGERY COMPARED TO AMPUTATION IN BONE AND SOFT TISSUE TUMORS: A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF CURRENT EVIDENCE
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Bone and soft tissue sarcomas historically required amputation for local control. But the development of imaging, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and surgical...

