Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

MILITARY AND POLITICAL ACTIVITY OF MIRANSHAH IBN TIMUR (1366-1408)

View through CrossRef
The article explores the military-political activity of Miranshah ibn Timur (1366-1408), the son of the emir Timur and the statesman of the Timurid Empire. The author considers the role of Miranshah in the government of Timur, his participation in military campaigns and the role in the dynastic crisis of 1405-1409. The study uses Persian, Arab, Armenian, European and Byzantine sources to develop a holistic understanding of the history of the figure of Miranshah. A comprehensive study of the biographies of the Timurids was practically not carried out, with the exception of several personalities (Timur, Shahrukh, Ulugbek, Babur), although such work can significantly clarify the history of the political and military structure in the state of Timur, as well as the peculiarities of the transfer of power in this empire. For modern Ukrainian historiography, this issue is poorly studied, despite its importance in the context of the medieval history of Central Asia, Iran, Iraq and the South Caucasus. The methodology of this study includes the use of historical-systemic and prosopographic methods, as well as the deduction method. In the process of research, the political, military and dynastic components of Miranshah's activity were alternately studied. The author found out that Miranshah ibn Timur was successful in numerous military campaigns of his father, Emir Timur, was an influential politician (receiving a delegation from Castile, etc.) and was a senior representative of the Timurid dynasty at the time of 1405, which gave him and his descendants a significant chance to gain power. However, the course of events of the Timurid conflict in 1405-1409 proved that Miranshah's military and political ambitions were limited to the region of Iraq, parts of Iran and Transcaucasia. Miranshah had no intentions regarding his father's imperial throne, and his sons were at war with each other and were not the only political group that defends its own interests. As a result, the more politically motivated Shahrukh ibn Timur won the feud, and Miranshah died during local battles for the patrimonial lands in 1408. Miranshah's sons (Khalil-Sultan, Abu Bakr and Umar) left the political arena of theTimurid state by the 1410s, without achieving consolidation of forces in the struggle for power in the empire.
Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv
Title: MILITARY AND POLITICAL ACTIVITY OF MIRANSHAH IBN TIMUR (1366-1408)
Description:
The article explores the military-political activity of Miranshah ibn Timur (1366-1408), the son of the emir Timur and the statesman of the Timurid Empire.
The author considers the role of Miranshah in the government of Timur, his participation in military campaigns and the role in the dynastic crisis of 1405-1409.
The study uses Persian, Arab, Armenian, European and Byzantine sources to develop a holistic understanding of the history of the figure of Miranshah.
A comprehensive study of the biographies of the Timurids was practically not carried out, with the exception of several personalities (Timur, Shahrukh, Ulugbek, Babur), although such work can significantly clarify the history of the political and military structure in the state of Timur, as well as the peculiarities of the transfer of power in this empire.
For modern Ukrainian historiography, this issue is poorly studied, despite its importance in the context of the medieval history of Central Asia, Iran, Iraq and the South Caucasus.
The methodology of this study includes the use of historical-systemic and prosopographic methods, as well as the deduction method.
In the process of research, the political, military and dynastic components of Miranshah's activity were alternately studied.
The author found out that Miranshah ibn Timur was successful in numerous military campaigns of his father, Emir Timur, was an influential politician (receiving a delegation from Castile, etc.
) and was a senior representative of the Timurid dynasty at the time of 1405, which gave him and his descendants a significant chance to gain power.
However, the course of events of the Timurid conflict in 1405-1409 proved that Miranshah's military and political ambitions were limited to the region of Iraq, parts of Iran and Transcaucasia.
Miranshah had no intentions regarding his father's imperial throne, and his sons were at war with each other and were not the only political group that defends its own interests.
As a result, the more politically motivated Shahrukh ibn Timur won the feud, and Miranshah died during local battles for the patrimonial lands in 1408.
Miranshah's sons (Khalil-Sultan, Abu Bakr and Umar) left the political arena of theTimurid state by the 1410s, without achieving consolidation of forces in the struggle for power in the empire.

Related Results

Hayy ibn Yaqzan: Ibn Tufayl's Masterpiece
Hayy ibn Yaqzan: Ibn Tufayl's Masterpiece
Ibn Tufayl, the great Andalusian thinker of the 12th century, is important in the history of Islamic philosophical thought because of his masterpiece Hayy ibn Yaqzan. Ibn Tufayl's ...
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Abstract The Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans (Guidelines) advises older adults to be as active as possible. Yet, despite the well documented benefits of physical a...
Mâtürîdî'nin İbn Abbas Rivayetlerine Yaklaşımı
Mâtürîdî'nin İbn Abbas Rivayetlerine Yaklaşımı
Çalışmada İslam tefsir geleneğinin erken dönem müfessirlerinden biri olan Mâtürîdî’nin (ö.333/944) İbn Abbas (ö. 68/687-688) rivayetlerine yaklaşımı incelenmektedir. Bilindiği üzer...
Bilgi Herkese Açık mı? İbn Sînâ’da Felsefî Bilginin Aktarımı, Liyakat ve Ahlakî Sınırlar
Bilgi Herkese Açık mı? İbn Sînâ’da Felsefî Bilginin Aktarımı, Liyakat ve Ahlakî Sınırlar
Bu makale, İslam felsefe geleneğinde felsefî bilginin aktarımına dair geliştirilen seçici yaklaşımı, özellikle İbn Sînâ’nın pedagojik ve ahlâkî tutumu üzerinden incelemektedir. Çal...
ILMU PENGETAHUAN DAN PEMBAGIANNYA MENURUT IBN KHALDUN
ILMU PENGETAHUAN DAN PEMBAGIANNYA MENURUT IBN KHALDUN
Although he also discussed science with various branches and scope, so that he was known as an expert in the discourse of science in Islam, Ibn Khaldun was still often positioned a...
Was Ibn Kathīr the ‘Spokesperson’ for Ibn Taymiyya? Jonah as a Prophet of Obedience
Was Ibn Kathīr the ‘Spokesperson’ for Ibn Taymiyya? Jonah as a Prophet of Obedience
Current scholarship views the Qur'anic exegesis of Ibn Kathīr as the product of the great Ibn Taymiyya. This paper argues that Ibn Kathīr had a distinct Qur'anic hermeneutic and ex...

Back to Top