Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Curriculum History
View through CrossRef
The field of curriculum studies in the United States has transformed from an area of study primarily concerned with curriculum development in schools to one focused on understanding and theorizing curriculum inside and outside of schools. Since the 1960s, the field of curriculum studies also has become more historical. Curriculum history, as a subset of curriculum studies, originated during the reconceptualization of curriculum studies and debates about revisionism within those studying histories of education. The field of curriculum history emerged with a range of perspectives (revisionist, critical, international, postmodern), areas of focus (intellectual histories, single event accounts, biographies, institutional practices), and source materials. The differences in both theoretical perspectives and methodologies require that we move away from the idea of a singular account of curriculum history and toward the concept of a multiplicity of curriculum histories. In the period of post-reconceptualized curriculum studies, curriculum historians have moved the field in multiple methodological and theoretical directions. The areas of curriculum studies and curriculum history continue to develop and change. There are efforts to create a more international understanding of curriculum history. There are also efforts to move beyond linear narratives of progress and revisionist efforts to speak into this field’s silences. Within this complex field, curriculum studies scholars and curriculum historians will continue to grapple with the relationships of past, present, and future; with connections between theory and practice; and with expanding (both geographically and epistemologically) ways of understanding.
Title: Curriculum History
Description:
The field of curriculum studies in the United States has transformed from an area of study primarily concerned with curriculum development in schools to one focused on understanding and theorizing curriculum inside and outside of schools.
Since the 1960s, the field of curriculum studies also has become more historical.
Curriculum history, as a subset of curriculum studies, originated during the reconceptualization of curriculum studies and debates about revisionism within those studying histories of education.
The field of curriculum history emerged with a range of perspectives (revisionist, critical, international, postmodern), areas of focus (intellectual histories, single event accounts, biographies, institutional practices), and source materials.
The differences in both theoretical perspectives and methodologies require that we move away from the idea of a singular account of curriculum history and toward the concept of a multiplicity of curriculum histories.
In the period of post-reconceptualized curriculum studies, curriculum historians have moved the field in multiple methodological and theoretical directions.
The areas of curriculum studies and curriculum history continue to develop and change.
There are efforts to create a more international understanding of curriculum history.
There are also efforts to move beyond linear narratives of progress and revisionist efforts to speak into this field’s silences.
Within this complex field, curriculum studies scholars and curriculum historians will continue to grapple with the relationships of past, present, and future; with connections between theory and practice; and with expanding (both geographically and epistemologically) ways of understanding.
Related Results
The Understanding of Curriculum Change
The Understanding of Curriculum Change
The curriculum is the key and indispensable part of the academic and training system that contains immense aims of scientific, thought, social, political, cultural, and moral facet...
Teachers' interpretation of curriculum as a window into ‘curriculum potential’
Teachers' interpretation of curriculum as a window into ‘curriculum potential’
AbstractBen‐Peretz's (1975) concept of intended curriculum describes a version of curriculum that ‘official’ curriculum developers create to provide a detailed guide to what teache...
MANAJEMEN KURIKULUM DALAM PERSPEKTIF BEAUCHAMP
MANAJEMEN KURIKULUM DALAM PERSPEKTIF BEAUCHAMP
Curriculum management is a curriculum management system that is cooperative, understood, systemic and systematic to achieve curriculum goals. A good curriculum is a curriculum that...
Discussions on Identity of Local Curriculum
Discussions on Identity of Local Curriculum
Objectives The paper aims to discuss the possibility of ‘Local Curriculum,’ which is developed and officialized by local education offices, to exist with an identity as a curricul...
PRINSIP-PRINSIP PENGEMBANGAN KURIKULUM
PRINSIP-PRINSIP PENGEMBANGAN KURIKULUM
ABSTRACTThe curriculum is the core of the education process in schools. The implementation ofthe curriculum directly influences the educational outcomes. The curriculum reallydeter...
Sufistic Curriculum Development Management at the Islamic Boarding School
Sufistic Curriculum Development Management at the Islamic Boarding School
The research departs from the phenomenon of the development of Islamic boarding school education models with varying names and styles. Islamic boarding schools are faced with two i...
Theorising Curriculum in Unsettling Times in African Higher Education
Theorising Curriculum in Unsettling Times in African Higher Education
Curriculum studies is at the core of the educational endeavour and informs what happens in every educational institution. As a result of the criticality or primacy of the curriculu...
MANAJEMEN KURIKULUM DALAM PERSPEKTIF BEAUCHAMP
MANAJEMEN KURIKULUM DALAM PERSPEKTIF BEAUCHAMP
Curriculum management is a curriculum management system that is cooperative, understood, systemic and systematic to achieve curriculum goals. A good curriculum is a curriculum that...

