Javascript must be enabled to continue!
The Sandinista Revolution and the FSLN
View through CrossRef
In July 1961 a group of young, radicalized Nicaraguans inspired by the experience of Cuba founded a guerrilla organization, the Front de Libération Nationale (National Liberation Front, or FLN), to take up arms against the Somoza regime. Later, one of its founding leaders added the epithet “Sandinista” to the organization’s name (inspired by the anti-imperialist tradition started by Augusto César Sandino, who led a rebellion from 1927 to 1933), making it the Frente Sandinista de Liberación Nacional (Sandinista National Liberation Front, or FSLN) as of 1962. Initially, the FSLN focused on carrying out guerrilla actions in the mountains. But it was in the second half of the 1970s that the FSLN began to gain real political influence after activating urban groups, gaining the support of the middle class, and even co-opting members of high society. Four factors played a key role in challenging the regime of President Anastasio Somoza DeBayle: the position of the Carter administration in favor of human rights, the social impact of the assassination of Pedro J. Chamorro (a prestigious journalist opposed to the regime) in 1978, the intense repression unleashed by Somoza’s National Guard, and the FSLN’s capacity to create alliances. Thanks to this combination of factors, together with the social support they enjoyed among the poor urban youth, on 19 July 1979 the leaders of FSLN went out onto the streets of Managua to proclaim the Sandinista Revolution. The revolutionary process led by the FSLN had many objectives, but it laid stress on a profound agrarian reform and mobilized the population in campaigns for education and health. At the institutional level the revolution created a centralized state led by the FSLN, which, at the international level, became associated with Cuba and the Soviet Union, although it also maintained relations with other regimes in Latin America and western Europe. However, the revolution soon also found a powerful enemy: the US administration led by Ronald Reagan, which designed and financed a campaign of political aggression (the counterrevolutionary war) to end the revolutionary experience that, as was claimed, could extend throughout the region. The counterrevolutionary war limited and changed many of the projects that the FSLN had initially planned. In 1990, after almost a decade of war and economic crisis, elections were held in the framework of liberal-democratic institutions created as a result of a constitution drawn up in 1987. Daniel Ortega (president of Nicaragua since 1984) represented the FSLN against a broad coalition led by Violeta Barrios (the widow of Pedro J. Chamorro, the journalist assassinated in 1978). Barrios won the election, and for the first time in history an organization that had reached power by taking up arms gave up its power following defeat at the ballot box. After losing the elections, the FSLN became a political party, turning into the main opposition force in the country, a position it held for sixteen years. Nevertheless, after losing three consecutive elections (in 2006, 2011, and 2016), it won the presidency of the Republic with the leader who had lost in 1990, Daniel Ortega. Yet the FSLN that reached power had undergone a heavy organizational and ideological change. Currently, the FSLN is a party controlled and dominated by the Ortega family, and its main objective is to remain in power. There is ample literature on the Nicaraguan Revolution and Sandinismo, although most of it was written in, or after, the 1980s. This is important because it means that these works coincided with the Sandinista Revolution, and, therefore, regardless of their quality, they were conditioned by it.
Title: The Sandinista Revolution and the FSLN
Description:
In July 1961 a group of young, radicalized Nicaraguans inspired by the experience of Cuba founded a guerrilla organization, the Front de Libération Nationale (National Liberation Front, or FLN), to take up arms against the Somoza regime.
Later, one of its founding leaders added the epithet “Sandinista” to the organization’s name (inspired by the anti-imperialist tradition started by Augusto César Sandino, who led a rebellion from 1927 to 1933), making it the Frente Sandinista de Liberación Nacional (Sandinista National Liberation Front, or FSLN) as of 1962.
Initially, the FSLN focused on carrying out guerrilla actions in the mountains.
But it was in the second half of the 1970s that the FSLN began to gain real political influence after activating urban groups, gaining the support of the middle class, and even co-opting members of high society.
Four factors played a key role in challenging the regime of President Anastasio Somoza DeBayle: the position of the Carter administration in favor of human rights, the social impact of the assassination of Pedro J.
Chamorro (a prestigious journalist opposed to the regime) in 1978, the intense repression unleashed by Somoza’s National Guard, and the FSLN’s capacity to create alliances.
Thanks to this combination of factors, together with the social support they enjoyed among the poor urban youth, on 19 July 1979 the leaders of FSLN went out onto the streets of Managua to proclaim the Sandinista Revolution.
The revolutionary process led by the FSLN had many objectives, but it laid stress on a profound agrarian reform and mobilized the population in campaigns for education and health.
At the institutional level the revolution created a centralized state led by the FSLN, which, at the international level, became associated with Cuba and the Soviet Union, although it also maintained relations with other regimes in Latin America and western Europe.
However, the revolution soon also found a powerful enemy: the US administration led by Ronald Reagan, which designed and financed a campaign of political aggression (the counterrevolutionary war) to end the revolutionary experience that, as was claimed, could extend throughout the region.
The counterrevolutionary war limited and changed many of the projects that the FSLN had initially planned.
In 1990, after almost a decade of war and economic crisis, elections were held in the framework of liberal-democratic institutions created as a result of a constitution drawn up in 1987.
Daniel Ortega (president of Nicaragua since 1984) represented the FSLN against a broad coalition led by Violeta Barrios (the widow of Pedro J.
Chamorro, the journalist assassinated in 1978).
Barrios won the election, and for the first time in history an organization that had reached power by taking up arms gave up its power following defeat at the ballot box.
After losing the elections, the FSLN became a political party, turning into the main opposition force in the country, a position it held for sixteen years.
Nevertheless, after losing three consecutive elections (in 2006, 2011, and 2016), it won the presidency of the Republic with the leader who had lost in 1990, Daniel Ortega.
Yet the FSLN that reached power had undergone a heavy organizational and ideological change.
Currently, the FSLN is a party controlled and dominated by the Ortega family, and its main objective is to remain in power.
There is ample literature on the Nicaraguan Revolution and Sandinismo, although most of it was written in, or after, the 1980s.
This is important because it means that these works coincided with the Sandinista Revolution, and, therefore, regardless of their quality, they were conditioned by it.
Related Results
Género, memoria e identidad política en la narrativa de Gioconda Belli
Género, memoria e identidad política en la narrativa de Gioconda Belli
Debido a los eventos políticos y revolucionarios de los setenta en Centroamérica, específicamente en Nicaragua, la mujer tuvo que redefinir su búsqueda de igualdad desde una perspe...
Hannah Arendt and Theories of Revolution
Hannah Arendt and Theories of Revolution
This thesis attempts to answer the following question: Is Hannah Arendt's theory of revolution unique, or does it fit into a contemporary school of thought on revolution? An effort...
El país de las mujeres, Gioconda Belli’s (Neo)feminist Treatise: New Proposals for a Post-Sandinista Society in Nicaragua
El país de las mujeres, Gioconda Belli’s (Neo)feminist Treatise: New Proposals for a Post-Sandinista Society in Nicaragua
This article examines the connections between the historical Sandinista past in Nicaragua (1979-1990), the controversial Sandinista return with Daniel Ortega (2007-2018), and the l...
Octavio Paz, Mídia e Revolução Sandinista
Octavio Paz, Mídia e Revolução Sandinista
A Revolução Sandinista produziu intensos debates entre os intelectuais latino-americanos em relação às possibilidades da esquerda armada conquistar o poder e estabelecer um sistema...
СТРУКТУРА РЕВОЛЮЦИЙ. ЧАСТЬ 1. КОНФЛИКТОЛОГИЧЕСКАЯ И СОЦИАЛЬНО-ПОЛИТИЧЕСКАЯ СТРУКТУРА РЕВОЛЮЦИЙ
СТРУКТУРА РЕВОЛЮЦИЙ. ЧАСТЬ 1. КОНФЛИКТОЛОГИЧЕСКАЯ И СОЦИАЛЬНО-ПОЛИТИЧЕСКАЯ СТРУКТУРА РЕВОЛЮЦИЙ
the article analyzes one of the most important features of the revolution — its structure. The author highlights several structures, but the main attention is focusing on the analy...
The American Revolution
The American Revolution
As a transformative event in American, world, and Atlantic history, the American Revolution has always attracted great interest. One of the results is an enormous literature, meani...
Industrial Revolution 4.0 - A New World Order?
Industrial Revolution 4.0 - A New World Order?
In history, we have already experienced three industrial revolutions: the first industrial revolution took place between 1760 and 1830. It was the transition to new production proc...
Chomsky’s other Revolution
Chomsky’s other Revolution
Noam Chomsky is closely associated with the eponymous Chomskyan Revolution, a dramatic shift of allegiances, interests, and methodologies in linguistics over the decade or so follo...

