Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Endoscopic Management for Difficult Biliary Cases in the era of Laparoscopic Surgery
View through CrossRef
Abstract
Background: Biliary disorders are still the most challenging cases in the field of gastroenterology, as comprehensive clinical evaluation and treatment considerations are still necessary. In the era of laparoscopic procedure, there are a lot of innovations on non-surgical management approaches, such as endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and endoscopic ultrasound (EUS). Since there is no clear consensus yet in managing complicated biliary disorders, this study is aimed to see the impact of endoscopic management for difficult biliary cases. Methods: A cohort-retrospective endoscopy database study was conducted at a tertiary-referral private hospital in Jakarta, Indonesia, between January and December 2020. Difficult biliary cases defined as biliary case which required at least one of the following conditions: multi-management approach, biliary obstruction with cholangitis or biliary sepsis, difficult CBD stone, recurrent CBD stone, or advanced progressive malignant biliary obstruction. Results: Sixty-one subjects in this retrospective database study were suitable as difficult biliary cases. The proportions of malignant and non-malignant etiologies were similar (44.3% versus 55.7%, respectively). In this study, 68.8% of all subjects underwent standard therapeutic ERCP procedure, while 16.4% of the subjects underwent combination of therapeutic ERCP and EUS in one session based on the complexity of the case; and 8.2% of the subjects underwent therapeutic ERCP with additional single operator cholangioscopy procedure. One subject underwent rendezvous ERCP procedure through percutaneous approach. Around 4.9% of the subjects underwent EUS-biliary drainage procedure. The technical success rate of all procedures was 100%. Re-intervention ERCP was performed in 6 subjects (9.8%). No significant association was observed between all mortality outcomes and baseline characteristics of the patients. There were also no significant associations between re-intervention procedures, as well as post-procedural pain or acute pancreatitis, with mortality outcomes. Conclusion: Difficult biliary cases require a good clinical approach algorithm to decide which procedure comes first based on comprehensive evaluation consists of patient’s factor, expertise, cost, and the risk of complications.
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Title: Endoscopic Management for Difficult Biliary Cases in the era of Laparoscopic Surgery
Description:
Abstract
Background: Biliary disorders are still the most challenging cases in the field of gastroenterology, as comprehensive clinical evaluation and treatment considerations are still necessary.
In the era of laparoscopic procedure, there are a lot of innovations on non-surgical management approaches, such as endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and endoscopic ultrasound (EUS).
Since there is no clear consensus yet in managing complicated biliary disorders, this study is aimed to see the impact of endoscopic management for difficult biliary cases.
Methods: A cohort-retrospective endoscopy database study was conducted at a tertiary-referral private hospital in Jakarta, Indonesia, between January and December 2020.
Difficult biliary cases defined as biliary case which required at least one of the following conditions: multi-management approach, biliary obstruction with cholangitis or biliary sepsis, difficult CBD stone, recurrent CBD stone, or advanced progressive malignant biliary obstruction.
Results: Sixty-one subjects in this retrospective database study were suitable as difficult biliary cases.
The proportions of malignant and non-malignant etiologies were similar (44.
3% versus 55.
7%, respectively).
In this study, 68.
8% of all subjects underwent standard therapeutic ERCP procedure, while 16.
4% of the subjects underwent combination of therapeutic ERCP and EUS in one session based on the complexity of the case; and 8.
2% of the subjects underwent therapeutic ERCP with additional single operator cholangioscopy procedure.
One subject underwent rendezvous ERCP procedure through percutaneous approach.
Around 4.
9% of the subjects underwent EUS-biliary drainage procedure.
The technical success rate of all procedures was 100%.
Re-intervention ERCP was performed in 6 subjects (9.
8%).
No significant association was observed between all mortality outcomes and baseline characteristics of the patients.
There were also no significant associations between re-intervention procedures, as well as post-procedural pain or acute pancreatitis, with mortality outcomes.
Conclusion: Difficult biliary cases require a good clinical approach algorithm to decide which procedure comes first based on comprehensive evaluation consists of patient’s factor, expertise, cost, and the risk of complications.
Related Results
Hydatid Disease of The Brain Parenchyma: A Systematic Review
Hydatid Disease of The Brain Parenchyma: A Systematic Review
Abstarct
Introduction
Isolated brain hydatid disease (BHD) is an extremely rare form of echinococcosis. A prompt and timely diagnosis is a crucial step in disease management. This ...
Microwave Ablation with or Without Chemotherapy in Management of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review
Microwave Ablation with or Without Chemotherapy in Management of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review
Abstract
Introduction
Microwave ablation (MWA) has emerged as a minimally invasive treatment for patients with inoperable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, whether it i...
Bile Duct Injuries: Comprehensive Review
Bile Duct Injuries: Comprehensive Review
Bile duct injuries (BDIs) are critical complications of surgical interventions involving the biliary tract, primarily occurring post-cholecystectomy. With an incidence of 0.3%–0.6%...
Distribution of pyruvate dehydrogenase dihydrolipoamide acetyltransferase (PDC-E2) and another mitochondrial marker in salivary gland and biliary epithelium from patients with primary biliary cirrhosis
Distribution of pyruvate dehydrogenase dihydrolipoamide acetyltransferase (PDC-E2) and another mitochondrial marker in salivary gland and biliary epithelium from patients with primary biliary cirrhosis
Previous studies in which quantitative immunofluorescence was used have shown that certain biliary epithelial cells in liver with primary biliary cirrhosis show increased levels of...
Breast Carcinoma within Fibroadenoma: A Systematic Review
Breast Carcinoma within Fibroadenoma: A Systematic Review
Abstract
Introduction
Fibroadenoma is the most common benign breast lesion; however, it carries a potential risk of malignant transformation. This systematic review provides an ove...
An assessment of the learning curve for laparoscopic and total laparoscopic hysterectomy
An assessment of the learning curve for laparoscopic and total laparoscopic hysterectomy
ObjectiveTo determine guidelines for an appropriate learning curve for laparoscopic hysterectomy for novice and experienced surgeons.DesignAn analysis of the first year of practice...
Chest Wall Hydatid Cysts: A Systematic Review
Chest Wall Hydatid Cysts: A Systematic Review
Abstract
Introduction
Given the rarity of chest wall hydatid disease, information on this condition is primarily drawn from case reports. Hence, this study systematically reviews t...
Navigation with laparoscopic ultrasound during fundus-first laparoscopic cholecystectomy-a single-centre retrospective case control study
Navigation with laparoscopic ultrasound during fundus-first laparoscopic cholecystectomy-a single-centre retrospective case control study
Abstract
Background
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is considered as the gold standard treatment for cholecystolithiasis. The critical view of safety is a generally accepted ...

