Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Ernesto Laclau
View through CrossRef
Ernesto Laclau (1939–2014) has been praised for producing challenging and multilayered theoretical work focusing mainly on three fields: discourse, hegemony, and populism. Laclau was professor of political theory in the Department of Government at the University of Essex until 2008, when he became an emeritus professor. At Essex he established and directed for many years the doctoral program in ideology and discourse analysis. From 1990 to 1997 he also served as director of the Centre for Theoretical Studies in the Humanities and the Social Sciences. His academic and political trajectory started in Argentina, where, initially as a history student and activist, he became associated with a series of leftist political formations from 1958 to 1968. In 1969, he moved to the United Kingdom, where he completed his studies and eventually started his academic career at the University of Essex. He is considered one of the founding figures of so-called post-Marxism, and his theoretical insights formed a school of thought often discussed as the Essex School of Discourse Analysis. Ernesto Laclau introduced, throughout his career—either alone or in collaboration with Chantal Mouffe—a complex and robust conceptual apparatus (comprising concepts like “articulation,” the “nodal point,” “dislocation,” the “empty signifier,” etc.) as a result of the radicalization and re-elaboration of the Gramscian conceptualization of hegemony. The roots of his post-Marxism can be traced back to the Argentinean political landscape of the 1960s, as he felt the deep impact of Peronism—hence his lifelong interest in the illumination of populist politics. Hegemony and Socialist Strategy, his most well-known work, coauthored with Chantal Mouffe, marks his outright passage to this terrain. The two authors radically opposed the reductionism and essentialism of orthodox Marxism, eventually turning their interest to the development of a comprehensive poststructuralist theory of discourse. The constitutive character of the discursive within a negative ontology of the limit forms the cornerstone of Laclau’s take on hegemony and the operation(s) of the political. Throughout his entire theoretical trajectory, he continued to develop and explore with great consistency this perspective through an ongoing dialogue with many traditions of thought: Marxism, semiology, deconstruction, post-analytical philosophy, the mystical tradition in theology, psychoanalysis (Freud and Lacan) and beyond.
Title: Ernesto Laclau
Description:
Ernesto Laclau (1939–2014) has been praised for producing challenging and multilayered theoretical work focusing mainly on three fields: discourse, hegemony, and populism.
Laclau was professor of political theory in the Department of Government at the University of Essex until 2008, when he became an emeritus professor.
At Essex he established and directed for many years the doctoral program in ideology and discourse analysis.
From 1990 to 1997 he also served as director of the Centre for Theoretical Studies in the Humanities and the Social Sciences.
His academic and political trajectory started in Argentina, where, initially as a history student and activist, he became associated with a series of leftist political formations from 1958 to 1968.
In 1969, he moved to the United Kingdom, where he completed his studies and eventually started his academic career at the University of Essex.
He is considered one of the founding figures of so-called post-Marxism, and his theoretical insights formed a school of thought often discussed as the Essex School of Discourse Analysis.
Ernesto Laclau introduced, throughout his career—either alone or in collaboration with Chantal Mouffe—a complex and robust conceptual apparatus (comprising concepts like “articulation,” the “nodal point,” “dislocation,” the “empty signifier,” etc.
) as a result of the radicalization and re-elaboration of the Gramscian conceptualization of hegemony.
The roots of his post-Marxism can be traced back to the Argentinean political landscape of the 1960s, as he felt the deep impact of Peronism—hence his lifelong interest in the illumination of populist politics.
Hegemony and Socialist Strategy, his most well-known work, coauthored with Chantal Mouffe, marks his outright passage to this terrain.
The two authors radically opposed the reductionism and essentialism of orthodox Marxism, eventually turning their interest to the development of a comprehensive poststructuralist theory of discourse.
The constitutive character of the discursive within a negative ontology of the limit forms the cornerstone of Laclau’s take on hegemony and the operation(s) of the political.
Throughout his entire theoretical trajectory, he continued to develop and explore with great consistency this perspective through an ongoing dialogue with many traditions of thought: Marxism, semiology, deconstruction, post-analytical philosophy, the mystical tradition in theology, psychoanalysis (Freud and Lacan) and beyond.
Related Results
Ernesto Laclau and Critical Media Studies: Marxism, Capitalism, and Critique
Ernesto Laclau and Critical Media Studies: Marxism, Capitalism, and Critique
Ernesto Laclau’s post-Marxist discourse theory is increasingly utilised within media studies in order to investigate discourses circulating about, within, and through media. Discou...
Ernesto Laclau and Communication Studies
Ernesto Laclau and Communication Studies
Arguably one of the most important political theorists of our time, Ernesto Laclau has produced an extremely influential theoretical corpus involving a multitude of methodological ...
Los fundamentos de la política. Un contrapunto entre Enrique Dussel y Ernesto Laclau
Los fundamentos de la política. Un contrapunto entre Enrique Dussel y Ernesto Laclau
Este artículo compara los elementos centrales en las teorías políticas de Enrique Dussel y Ernesto Laclau. Laclau defiende un pensamiento postfundacionalista, que parte de las crít...
Time, Desire, Politics: A Reply to Ernesto Laclau
Time, Desire, Politics: A Reply to Ernesto Laclau
The paper elucidates the author's conception of finitude and the logic of survival, which involves a deconstruction of the opposition between mortality and immortality. Returning t...
Democracy without Hegemony: A Reply to Mark Purcell
Democracy without Hegemony: A Reply to Mark Purcell
My own engagement with Ernesto Laclau goes back to the mid-1970s in the UK when he was for a time my PhD supervisor at Essex, after I had arrived from Argentina some years after he...
A Caliphate of Ideas? Islamic Politics in Dialogue with Contemporary Marxism
A Caliphate of Ideas? Islamic Politics in Dialogue with Contemporary Marxism
This article deconstructs the conceptual framework of the social theorist Salman Sayyid by critically examining his work on the political and hegemony in relation to the thought of...
Correspondência (1935-1964): António Jorge Dias e Ernesto Veiga de Oliveira
Correspondência (1935-1964): António Jorge Dias e Ernesto Veiga de Oliveira
O livro Correspondência (1935-1964): António Jorge Dias e Ernesto Veiga de Oliveira, organizado e apresentado por João Leal e Catarina Belo, reúne a correspondência trocada pelos d...
DONOSO ROMO, Andres. A Educação Emancipatória: Iván Illich, Paulo Freire, Ernesto Guevara e o Pensamento Latino-Americano. Tradução de Daniel Garroux e Mariana Moreno Castilho. São Paulo: EDUSP, 2020, 142 p
DONOSO ROMO, Andres. A Educação Emancipatória: Iván Illich, Paulo Freire, Ernesto Guevara e o Pensamento Latino-Americano. Tradução de Daniel Garroux e Mariana Moreno Castilho. São Paulo: EDUSP, 2020, 142 p
A obra aqui apresentada foi escrita por Andrés Donoso Romo, Doutor em Ciências com menção em Integração da América Latina pela Universidade de São Paulo (USP), pesquisador do Centr...

