Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Kingship and architecture in 11th- and 12th-century Cashel

View through CrossRef
The Rock of Cashel is a limestone crag which rises majestically from the plains of south Tipperary. It is crowned today by a suite of magnificent ecclesiastical structures which were all constructed after AD 1101 (Fig 1), including the splendid Cormac’s Chapel. It is for the latter that the site is most famous and, indeed, these structures form one of the most iconic images of medieval Ireland. Yet, while these buildings’ architecture has justifiably seen them much discussed and debated, an issue which has not received adequate consideration, particularly in the context of the site’s 11th- and 12th- century development, is the fact that the Rock of Cashel represented the focal point of the pre-eminent royal landscape in the province of Munster from at least the 7th century. Consequently, throughout the medieval period the Rock of Cashel was a place thoroughly conditioned by developments in the political landscape, and this paper explores how ‘realpolitik’ operated through the Rock of Cashel’s development in the 11th and 12th centuries. In particular, excavations by Brian Hodkinson in the 1990s uncovered evidence for activity between the 6th and 12th centuries, including a number of different structures and associated burials (1994, WS 4). While those excavations remain largely unpublished some recent radiocarbon dating allows a re-assessment of the original interpretation of the site’s development. This paper will suggest that the significance and symbolism of that evolution can only be understood when placed in the context of the struggle for supremacy in Munster and southern Ireland between two rival dynasties, the Uí Briain and Meic Carthaig. The structures and iconography of the Rock in this period reflect how dynasts of each group attempted to re-imagine and codify a royal ceremonial centre as a theatre for the political and ideological discourse regarding the issues which concerned contemporary 11th- and 12th-century society. This article was published open access under a CC BY licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ .
Liverpool University Press
Title: Kingship and architecture in 11th- and 12th-century Cashel
Description:
The Rock of Cashel is a limestone crag which rises majestically from the plains of south Tipperary.
It is crowned today by a suite of magnificent ecclesiastical structures which were all constructed after AD 1101 (Fig 1), including the splendid Cormac’s Chapel.
It is for the latter that the site is most famous and, indeed, these structures form one of the most iconic images of medieval Ireland.
Yet, while these buildings’ architecture has justifiably seen them much discussed and debated, an issue which has not received adequate consideration, particularly in the context of the site’s 11th- and 12th- century development, is the fact that the Rock of Cashel represented the focal point of the pre-eminent royal landscape in the province of Munster from at least the 7th century.
Consequently, throughout the medieval period the Rock of Cashel was a place thoroughly conditioned by developments in the political landscape, and this paper explores how ‘realpolitik’ operated through the Rock of Cashel’s development in the 11th and 12th centuries.
In particular, excavations by Brian Hodkinson in the 1990s uncovered evidence for activity between the 6th and 12th centuries, including a number of different structures and associated burials (1994, WS 4).
While those excavations remain largely unpublished some recent radiocarbon dating allows a re-assessment of the original interpretation of the site’s development.
This paper will suggest that the significance and symbolism of that evolution can only be understood when placed in the context of the struggle for supremacy in Munster and southern Ireland between two rival dynasties, the Uí Briain and Meic Carthaig.
The structures and iconography of the Rock in this period reflect how dynasts of each group attempted to re-imagine and codify a royal ceremonial centre as a theatre for the political and ideological discourse regarding the issues which concerned contemporary 11th- and 12th-century society.
This article was published open access under a CC BY licence: https://creativecommons.
org/licenses/by/4.
0/ .

Related Results

The architecture of differences
The architecture of differences
Following in the footsteps of the protagonists of the Italian architectural debate is a mark of culture and proactivity. The synthesis deriving from the artistic-humanistic factors...
Time and Architecture
Time and Architecture
In the Italian language, the term “tempo” (literally time) is a word of daily use to which we attribute many meanings. It can signify a chronological dimension between past, prese...
Kievan Rus’
Kievan Rus’
Robert Ousterhout, the author of a magnificent book “Eastern Medieval Architecture. The Building Traditions of Bizantium and Neighboring Lands”, published by Oxford University Pres...
Rajput Kingship
Rajput Kingship
The term Rajput kingship designates the sociocultural ideals and practices that inform sovereignty among the erstwhile kingdoms of northern India. Originating from the mixture of S...
Rewiews
Rewiews
Time and Architecture. The aspects that involve its dichotomous and synchronic relationship (De Fusco, 2019)1, make it a constantly present topic in the architectural debate, intri...

Back to Top