Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Willingness of French General Practitioners to Prescribe mHealth Apps and Devices: Quantitative Study (Preprint)

View through CrossRef
BACKGROUND The field of mobile health (mHealth) is constantly expanding. Integrating mHealth apps and devices in clinical practice is a major and complex challenge. General practitioners (GPs) are an essential link in a patient’s care pathway. As they are patients’ preferred health care intermediaries, GPs play an important role in supporting patients’ transition to mHealth. OBJECTIVE This study aims to identify the factors associated with the willingness of French GPs to prescribe mHealth apps and devices to their patients. METHODS This study was part of the ApiAppS project whose overall objective was to help remove barriers GPs face when prescribing mHealth apps and devices by developing a custom-built platform to aid them. The study included GPs recruited from the general practice department of several medical faculties in France (Lyon, Nice, and Rouen) and mailing lists of academic GPs, health care professional associations, and social and professional networks. Participants were asked to complete a web-based questionnaire that collected data on various sociodemographic variables, indicators of their involvement in continued education programs and the amount of time they dedicated to promoting healthy behaviors during patient consultations, and indicators characterizing their patient population. Data on their perceptions of mHealth apps and devices were also collected. Finally, the questionnaire included items to measure GPs’ acceptability of prescribing mHealth apps and devices for several health-related dimensions. RESULTS Of the 174 GPs, 129 (74.1%) declared their willingness to prescribe mHealth apps and devices to their patients. In multivariate analysis, involvement in continued education programs (odds ratio [OR] 6.17, 95% CI 1.52-28.72), a better patient base command of the French language (OR 1.45, 95% CI 1.13-1.88), GP-perceived benefits of mHealth apps and devices for both patients and their medical practice and GP-perceived drivers for mHealth apps and device implementation in their medical practice (OR 1.04, 95% CI 1.01-1.07), and validation of mHealth apps and devices through randomized clinical trials (OR 1.02, 95% CI 1.00-1.04) were all associated with GPs’ willingness to prescribe mHealth apps and devices. In contrast, older GPs (OR 0.95, 95% CI 0.91-0.98), female GPs (OR 0.26, 95% CI 0.09-0.69), and those who perceived risks for the patient or their medical practice (OR 0.96, 95% CI 0.94-0.99) were less inclined to prescribe mHealth apps and devices. CONCLUSIONS mHealth apps and devices were generally seen by GPs as useful in general medicine and were, for the most part, favorable to prescribing them. Their full integration in general medicine will be conditioned by the need for conclusive certification, transparency (reliable and precise data concerning mHealth app and device methods of construction and clinical validation), software aids to assist GPs prescribe them, and dedicated training programs.
Title: Willingness of French General Practitioners to Prescribe mHealth Apps and Devices: Quantitative Study (Preprint)
Description:
BACKGROUND The field of mobile health (mHealth) is constantly expanding.
Integrating mHealth apps and devices in clinical practice is a major and complex challenge.
General practitioners (GPs) are an essential link in a patient’s care pathway.
As they are patients’ preferred health care intermediaries, GPs play an important role in supporting patients’ transition to mHealth.
OBJECTIVE This study aims to identify the factors associated with the willingness of French GPs to prescribe mHealth apps and devices to their patients.
METHODS This study was part of the ApiAppS project whose overall objective was to help remove barriers GPs face when prescribing mHealth apps and devices by developing a custom-built platform to aid them.
The study included GPs recruited from the general practice department of several medical faculties in France (Lyon, Nice, and Rouen) and mailing lists of academic GPs, health care professional associations, and social and professional networks.
Participants were asked to complete a web-based questionnaire that collected data on various sociodemographic variables, indicators of their involvement in continued education programs and the amount of time they dedicated to promoting healthy behaviors during patient consultations, and indicators characterizing their patient population.
Data on their perceptions of mHealth apps and devices were also collected.
Finally, the questionnaire included items to measure GPs’ acceptability of prescribing mHealth apps and devices for several health-related dimensions.
RESULTS Of the 174 GPs, 129 (74.
1%) declared their willingness to prescribe mHealth apps and devices to their patients.
In multivariate analysis, involvement in continued education programs (odds ratio [OR] 6.
17, 95% CI 1.
52-28.
72), a better patient base command of the French language (OR 1.
45, 95% CI 1.
13-1.
88), GP-perceived benefits of mHealth apps and devices for both patients and their medical practice and GP-perceived drivers for mHealth apps and device implementation in their medical practice (OR 1.
04, 95% CI 1.
01-1.
07), and validation of mHealth apps and devices through randomized clinical trials (OR 1.
02, 95% CI 1.
00-1.
04) were all associated with GPs’ willingness to prescribe mHealth apps and devices.
In contrast, older GPs (OR 0.
95, 95% CI 0.
91-0.
98), female GPs (OR 0.
26, 95% CI 0.
09-0.
69), and those who perceived risks for the patient or their medical practice (OR 0.
96, 95% CI 0.
94-0.
99) were less inclined to prescribe mHealth apps and devices.
CONCLUSIONS mHealth apps and devices were generally seen by GPs as useful in general medicine and were, for the most part, favorable to prescribing them.
Their full integration in general medicine will be conditioned by the need for conclusive certification, transparency (reliable and precise data concerning mHealth app and device methods of construction and clinical validation), software aids to assist GPs prescribe them, and dedicated training programs.

Related Results

Playing Pregnancy: The Ludification and Gamification of Expectant Motherhood in Smartphone Apps
Playing Pregnancy: The Ludification and Gamification of Expectant Motherhood in Smartphone Apps
IntroductionLike other forms of embodiment, pregnancy has increasingly become subject to representation and interpretation via digital technologies. Pregnancy and the unborn entity...
Problem-Based mHealth Literacy Scale (PB-mHLS): Development and Validation
Problem-Based mHealth Literacy Scale (PB-mHLS): Development and Validation
Background Mobile devices have greatly facilitated the use of digital health resources, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic. Mobile health (mHealth) has b...
Research-Tested Mobile Apps for Breast Cancer Care: Systematic Review (Preprint)
Research-Tested Mobile Apps for Breast Cancer Care: Systematic Review (Preprint)
BACKGROUND The use of mobile health (mHealth) apps in clinical settings is increasing widely. mHealth has been used to promote prevention, improve early det...
A Gig mHealth Economy Framework: Scoping Review of Internet Publications
A Gig mHealth Economy Framework: Scoping Review of Internet Publications
BackgroundThe gig economy (characterized by short-term contracts rather than being a full-time employee in an organization) is one of the most recent and important tendencies that ...
Abstract B9: Smartphone applications as a source of cancer information
Abstract B9: Smartphone applications as a source of cancer information
Abstract The increasing popularity and advent of newer, better and relevant application programs (apps) has made smart phones an important source of healthcare infor...

Back to Top