Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Methylene Blue for Refractory Shock in Children: A Systematic Review and Survey Practice Analysis
View through CrossRef
Objectives:
Shock refractory to fluid and catecholamine therapy has significant morbidity and mortality in children. The use of methylene blue to treat refractory shock in children is not well described. We aim to collect and summarize the literature and define physicians’ practice patterns regarding the use of methylene blue to treat shock in children.
Design:
We conducted a systematic search of MEDLINE, Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane for studies involving the use of methylene blue for catecholamine-refractory shock from database inception to 2019. Collected studies were analyzed qualitatively. To describe practice patterns of methylene blue use, we electronically distributed a survey to U.S.-based pediatric critical care physicians. We assessed physician knowledge and experience with methylene blue. Survey responses were quantitatively and qualitatively evaluated.
Setting:
Pediatric critical and cardiac care units.
Patients or Subjects:
Patients less than or equal to 25 years old with refractory shock treated with methylene blue.
Interventions:
None.
Measurements and Main Results:
One-thousand two-hundred ninety-three abstracts met search criteria, 139 articles underwent full-text review, and 24 studies were included. Studies investigated refractory shock induced by a variety of etiologies and found that methylene blue was generally safe and increased mean arterial blood pressure. There is overall lack of studies, low number of study patients, and low quality of studies identified. Our survey had a 22.5% response rate, representing 125 institutions. Similar proportions of physicians reported using (40%) or never even considering (43%) methylene blue for shock. The most common reasons for not using methylene blue were unfamiliarity with this drug, its proper dosing, and lack of evidentiary support.
Conclusions:
Methylene blue appears safe and may benefit children with refractory shock. There is a stark divide in familiarity and practice patterns regarding its use among physicians. Studies to formally assess safety and efficacy of methylene blue in treating pediatric shock are warranted.
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Title: Methylene Blue for Refractory Shock in Children: A Systematic Review and Survey Practice Analysis
Description:
Objectives:
Shock refractory to fluid and catecholamine therapy has significant morbidity and mortality in children.
The use of methylene blue to treat refractory shock in children is not well described.
We aim to collect and summarize the literature and define physicians’ practice patterns regarding the use of methylene blue to treat shock in children.
Design:
We conducted a systematic search of MEDLINE, Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane for studies involving the use of methylene blue for catecholamine-refractory shock from database inception to 2019.
Collected studies were analyzed qualitatively.
To describe practice patterns of methylene blue use, we electronically distributed a survey to U.
S.
-based pediatric critical care physicians.
We assessed physician knowledge and experience with methylene blue.
Survey responses were quantitatively and qualitatively evaluated.
Setting:
Pediatric critical and cardiac care units.
Patients or Subjects:
Patients less than or equal to 25 years old with refractory shock treated with methylene blue.
Interventions:
None.
Measurements and Main Results:
One-thousand two-hundred ninety-three abstracts met search criteria, 139 articles underwent full-text review, and 24 studies were included.
Studies investigated refractory shock induced by a variety of etiologies and found that methylene blue was generally safe and increased mean arterial blood pressure.
There is overall lack of studies, low number of study patients, and low quality of studies identified.
Our survey had a 22.
5% response rate, representing 125 institutions.
Similar proportions of physicians reported using (40%) or never even considering (43%) methylene blue for shock.
The most common reasons for not using methylene blue were unfamiliarity with this drug, its proper dosing, and lack of evidentiary support.
Conclusions:
Methylene blue appears safe and may benefit children with refractory shock.
There is a stark divide in familiarity and practice patterns regarding its use among physicians.
Studies to formally assess safety and efficacy of methylene blue in treating pediatric shock are warranted.
Related Results
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Abstract
The Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans (Guidelines) advises older adults to be as active as possible. Yet, despite the well documented benefits of physical a...
The Blue Beret
The Blue Beret
When we think of United Nations (UN) peacekeepers, the first image that is conjured in our mind is of an individual sporting a blue helmet or a blue beret (fig. 1). While simple an...
Refractory Shock. Casuistics
Refractory Shock. Casuistics
Shock Syndrome is an acute progressive circulatory insufficiency where the Heart is unable to circulate the blood in time unit, for supplying with O2 to the cells and to take out f...
Cardiogenic shock classification evaluation after cardiac surgery to predict in-hospital mortality
Cardiogenic shock classification evaluation after cardiac surgery to predict in-hospital mortality
Abstract
Background
The Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions (SCAI) classification is a risk stratifi...
Complications Emerge in Breast Surgery by using dye methylene blue
Complications Emerge in Breast Surgery by using dye methylene blue
Introduction: Methylene blue color has been utilized around the world effectively with few complications in breast surgery. We display two diverse complications including methylene...
Do evidence summaries increase health policy‐makers' use of evidence from systematic reviews? A systematic review
Do evidence summaries increase health policy‐makers' use of evidence from systematic reviews? A systematic review
This review summarizes the evidence from six randomized controlled trials that judged the effectiveness of systematic review summaries on policymakers' decision making, or the most...
Family Pediatrics
Family Pediatrics
ABSTRACT/EXECUTIVE SUMMARYWhy a Task Force on the Family?The practice of pediatrics is unique among medical specialties in many ways, among which is the nearly certain presence of ...
“The Earth Is Dying, Bro”
“The Earth Is Dying, Bro”
Climate Change and Children
Australian children are uniquely situated in a vast landscape that varies drastically across locations. Spanning multiple climatic zones—from cool tempe...

