Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Book Review: Alex C. Castles: The Constitutional and Legal History of Sarawak. Documents and Commentaries. Vol. I. Vol. 1 Peoples' Law Making and Brooke Rule
View through CrossRef
Alex C. Castles; The Constitutional and Legal History of Sarawak. Documents and Commentaries. VoL 1 Peoples’ Law Making and Brooke Rule. Persatuan Sejarah Malaysia Cawangan Sarawak (Malaysia Historical Society Sarawak Branch), 2003, xx+294 pages. The layman does not immediately associate a legal treatise with the words accessible, fascinating, illuminating and informative, but this collection of documents and commentaries is all of these and is a significant contribution to Sarawak history. Professor Cashes is Emeritus Professor of Law, University of Adelaide and Professorial Fellow, Flinders University of South Australia. This compilation of documents from a variety of sources, many of them not easily accessible, brings together the foundahon materials for Sarawak’s legal and conshturional history, beginning with Adat Law, which preceded the Brookes, evolved as a significant element in the legal and constitutional structures they developed and retains an important role in regulating community life and land holding. Chapters 9 and 11, dealing with the administration of justice 1842 to 1942 and with Indigenous Community Law under Brooke rule,cover this development. James Brooke beganas a private adventurer, dependent for recognition in the first instance on the Brunei Sultanate. Much of his and Charles Brooke’s energieswere devoted to obtaining recognition of their independence from Brunei, extending their borders at the Sultanate’s expense, and obtaining international recognition of these acquisitions. This tortuous process takes up Chapters 2 to 6 and was inextricably linked to recognition of the legitimacy of the Brooke family dynasty, the subject of Chapter 7.
Title: Book Review: Alex C. Castles: The Constitutional and Legal History of Sarawak. Documents and Commentaries. Vol. I. Vol. 1 Peoples' Law Making and Brooke Rule
Description:
Alex C.
Castles; The Constitutional and Legal History of Sarawak.
Documents and Commentaries.
VoL 1 Peoples’ Law Making and Brooke Rule.
Persatuan Sejarah Malaysia Cawangan Sarawak (Malaysia Historical Society Sarawak Branch), 2003, xx+294 pages.
The layman does not immediately associate a legal treatise with the words accessible, fascinating, illuminating and informative, but this collection of documents and commentaries is all of these and is a significant contribution to Sarawak history.
Professor Cashes is Emeritus Professor of Law, University of Adelaide and Professorial Fellow, Flinders University of South Australia.
This compilation of documents from a variety of sources, many of them not easily accessible, brings together the foundahon materials for Sarawak’s legal and conshturional history, beginning with Adat Law, which preceded the Brookes, evolved as a significant element in the legal and constitutional structures they developed and retains an important role in regulating community life and land holding.
Chapters 9 and 11, dealing with the administration of justice 1842 to 1942 and with Indigenous Community Law under Brooke rule,cover this development.
James Brooke beganas a private adventurer, dependent for recognition in the first instance on the Brunei Sultanate.
Much of his and Charles Brooke’s energieswere devoted to obtaining recognition of their independence from Brunei, extending their borders at the Sultanate’s expense, and obtaining international recognition of these acquisitions.
This tortuous process takes up Chapters 2 to 6 and was inextricably linked to recognition of the legitimacy of the Brooke family dynasty, the subject of Chapter 7.
Related Results
From Constitutional Comparison to Life in the Biosphere
From Constitutional Comparison to Life in the Biosphere
From Constitutional Comparison to Life in the Biosphere is a monograph that argues for a fundamental reorientation of constitutional law around the realities of biospheric interdep...
Envisioning Originalism Applied to Bioethics Cases
Envisioning Originalism Applied to Bioethics Cases
Photo ID 123697425 © Alexandersikov | Dreamstime.com
Abstract
Originalism is an increasingly prevalent method for interpreting provisions of the US Constitution. It requires strict...
Autonomy on Trial
Autonomy on Trial
Photo by CHUTTERSNAP on Unsplash
Abstract
This paper critically examines how US bioethics and health law conceptualize patient autonomy, contrasting the rights-based, individualist...
The Role of the Judiciary in Constitutional Interpretation in Pakistan
The Role of the Judiciary in Constitutional Interpretation in Pakistan
This study examines the evolving role of the judiciary in Pakistan in interpreting the Constitution, exploring how the courts have come to terms with their position as the primary ...
A study on Mohe(Malgal)'s castles in Russian Primorsky krai
A study on Mohe(Malgal)'s castles in Russian Primorsky krai
This study is explained the characteristics and structures of Mohe's castles in Russian Primorsky krai. Examining characteristics such as their location, topography, form, size, fu...
An International Rule of Law
An International Rule of Law
The “international rule of law” is an elusive concept. Under this heading, mainly two variations are being discussed: The international rule of law “proper” and an “internationaliz...
Mezinárodní právo na prahu 21. století (dosažený stav, neúspěchy a perspektivy)
Mezinárodní právo na prahu 21. století (dosažený stav, neúspěchy a perspektivy)
The study deal with selected problems of international law at the time of change of the 20th and 21st centuries. Such a milestone gives an opportunity to review the achieved state ...
Analysis of the Constitutional Court Cases in 2022
Analysis of the Constitutional Court Cases in 2022
The Constitutional Court received a total of 2,829 cases in 2022 alone. Among the decisions made by the Constitutional Court in 2022, this paper reviews major decisions centered on...

