Javascript must be enabled to continue!
The use of ECHR practice during the investigation of war crimes
View through CrossRef
In the article it has been examined the issue of using the practice of the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) in the process of pre-trial investigations of war crimes. The importance of integrating European legal standards into Ukraine’s national criminal proceedings has been emphasized. Particular attention has been focused on the main problems associated with the recording and documenting of cases of war crimes, which have become especially relevant in the context of armed conflict. Emphasis has been placed on the necessity of strict adherence to the principle of the rule of law during the pre-trial investigation of war crimes, as well as on the importance of utilizing ECHR practices to enhance the effectiveness of investigations and ensure the protection of human rights. A detailed analysis of existing international and European standards that influence the conduct of pre-trial investigations of war crimes has been carried out. The necessity of implementing ECHR decisions to ensure the rights and freedoms of individuals in the context of armed conflict has been substantiated. The importance of creating effective control mechanisms for war crimes investigations to ensure their independence, objectivity, and compliance with legal norms has been emphasized. It has been noted that regular monitoring and evaluation of war crimes investigations should be carried out, as well as mechanisms for filing complaints and protecting the rights of victims should be created. It has been proven that the main requirements of the ECHR for conducting effective investigations of war crimes are: promptness and impartiality; transparency, taking into account the balance of private and public interests in criminal proceedings; the use of the standard of proof “beyond a reasonable doubt”; mandatory establishment of the proportionality of selected means and methods of conducting special operations/military operations to the goals of part 2 of Article 2 of the Convention, taking and adhering to all precautionary measures to preserve the lives of civilians, adherence to international humanitarian law norms when applying force in armed conflicts. It has been underscored that, in general, investigations of war crimes according to ECHR practices should be effective and independent, aimed at ensuring the preservation of evidence. The necessity to improve the professional level of war crimes investigations and to ensure fair justice for the victims of war crimes has been emphasized.
Title: The use of ECHR practice during the investigation of war crimes
Description:
In the article it has been examined the issue of using the practice of the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) in the process of pre-trial investigations of war crimes.
The importance of integrating European legal standards into Ukraine’s national criminal proceedings has been emphasized.
Particular attention has been focused on the main problems associated with the recording and documenting of cases of war crimes, which have become especially relevant in the context of armed conflict.
Emphasis has been placed on the necessity of strict adherence to the principle of the rule of law during the pre-trial investigation of war crimes, as well as on the importance of utilizing ECHR practices to enhance the effectiveness of investigations and ensure the protection of human rights.
A detailed analysis of existing international and European standards that influence the conduct of pre-trial investigations of war crimes has been carried out.
The necessity of implementing ECHR decisions to ensure the rights and freedoms of individuals in the context of armed conflict has been substantiated.
The importance of creating effective control mechanisms for war crimes investigations to ensure their independence, objectivity, and compliance with legal norms has been emphasized.
It has been noted that regular monitoring and evaluation of war crimes investigations should be carried out, as well as mechanisms for filing complaints and protecting the rights of victims should be created.
It has been proven that the main requirements of the ECHR for conducting effective investigations of war crimes are: promptness and impartiality; transparency, taking into account the balance of private and public interests in criminal proceedings; the use of the standard of proof “beyond a reasonable doubt”; mandatory establishment of the proportionality of selected means and methods of conducting special operations/military operations to the goals of part 2 of Article 2 of the Convention, taking and adhering to all precautionary measures to preserve the lives of civilians, adherence to international humanitarian law norms when applying force in armed conflicts.
It has been underscored that, in general, investigations of war crimes according to ECHR practices should be effective and independent, aimed at ensuring the preservation of evidence.
The necessity to improve the professional level of war crimes investigations and to ensure fair justice for the victims of war crimes has been emphasized.
Related Results
An Empirical Study on Cyber Crimes Against Women and Children in India
An Empirical Study on Cyber Crimes Against Women and Children in India
The aim of the study is to understand the Cyber-crimes against women and Children in India for a period of five years from 2017 to 2021. The study is based on Secondary data collec...
Crimes Against Humanity and Other International Crimes
Crimes Against Humanity and Other International Crimes
Abstract
This concluding chapter provides an overview of crimes against humanity. Crimes against humanity are characterized by several core features. First, they are...
24 War Crimes and Crimes against Humanity
24 War Crimes and Crimes against Humanity
Abstract
Four elements distinguish war crimes from crimes against humanity. War crimes may only be committed during an armed conflict, whereas crimes against humanit...
Crimes against Humanity
Crimes against Humanity
Crimes against humanity have both a colloquial and a legal existence. In daily parlance, the term is employed to condemn any number of atrocities that violate international human r...
Genocide in Ukraine: problems of proof
Genocide in Ukraine: problems of proof
The article emphasizes that genocide was first criminalized immediately after the Second World War, precisely in 1948 when the UN General Assembly unanimously adopted the Conventio...
Positive and negative obligations in the practice of the ECtHR based on article 2 of the ECHR
Positive and negative obligations in the practice of the ECtHR based on article 2 of the ECHR
It is indicated that the combination of positive and negative obligations of the state plays a key role in the protection of human rights. Considering such a basic right as the rig...
Crimes Against Humanity Under General International Law
Crimes Against Humanity Under General International Law
Abstract
This chapter discusses crimes against humanity under international law. Crimes against humanity were first introduced at Nuremberg as a means of criminalizi...
A Study on Adult‘s fear of Cyber Sex Crimes: Focusing on the Relationship between Perceptions of Punishment Criminal Psychology
A Study on Adult‘s fear of Cyber Sex Crimes: Focusing on the Relationship between Perceptions of Punishment Criminal Psychology
As the cyber world, such as the surrealism-oriented metaverse, is approaching, you will have a new experience that is different from before. On the contrary, this means that crimes...

