Javascript must be enabled to continue!
The Impact of the <i>Dobbs</i> Decision on Access to Gender Diverse Care at a Midwest Academic Health Center
View through CrossRef
Introduction. The Dobbs decision returned the regulation of abortion to individual states. In the Midwest, several legislative efforts have included restrictions on both abortion and gender-affirming care. Clinics that provide abortion services sometimes offer gender-affirming care. Given this intersection, recent laws restricting abortion may have unintended consequences for access to gender-affirming care in the Midwest.
Methods. Authors of this retrospective study analyzed medical records of patients seen at a Midwestern health center. We included patients 18 or older who attended a new patient visit at either the gender diversity clinic (GDC) or the general gynecology (GYN) clinic between July 1, 2021 and June 30, 2023. We used generalized estimating equations to assess changes in wait times and distance traveled pre- vs. post-Dobbs. Differences in new patient volume were analyzed using Poisson regression.
Results. We reviewed 5,260 charts, 4,552 from the GYN clinic and 708 from the GDC. Following Dobbs, the GYN clinic experienced a 6% increase in new patients, while the GDC saw a 21% increase (p<0.001). The average wait time for a GYN appointment increased by two days, whereas the wait time for GDC appointments decreased by 21 days. The average distance traveled by new GYN patients decreased by 6.3 miles (p<0.001), while distance for GDC patients increased by 2.5 miles (p=0.738).
Conclusions. Patients continue to seek gender-affirming care in the post-Dobbs landscape. Despite an increase in patient volume, wait times for gender diversity appointments decreased, likely reflecting expanded appointment availability around the time of the Dobbs decision.
The University of Kansas
Title: The Impact of the <i>Dobbs</i> Decision on Access to Gender Diverse Care at a Midwest Academic Health Center
Description:
Introduction.
The Dobbs decision returned the regulation of abortion to individual states.
In the Midwest, several legislative efforts have included restrictions on both abortion and gender-affirming care.
Clinics that provide abortion services sometimes offer gender-affirming care.
Given this intersection, recent laws restricting abortion may have unintended consequences for access to gender-affirming care in the Midwest.
Methods.
Authors of this retrospective study analyzed medical records of patients seen at a Midwestern health center.
We included patients 18 or older who attended a new patient visit at either the gender diversity clinic (GDC) or the general gynecology (GYN) clinic between July 1, 2021 and June 30, 2023.
We used generalized estimating equations to assess changes in wait times and distance traveled pre- vs.
post-Dobbs.
Differences in new patient volume were analyzed using Poisson regression.
Results.
We reviewed 5,260 charts, 4,552 from the GYN clinic and 708 from the GDC.
Following Dobbs, the GYN clinic experienced a 6% increase in new patients, while the GDC saw a 21% increase (p<0.
001).
The average wait time for a GYN appointment increased by two days, whereas the wait time for GDC appointments decreased by 21 days.
The average distance traveled by new GYN patients decreased by 6.
3 miles (p<0.
001), while distance for GDC patients increased by 2.
5 miles (p=0.
738).
Conclusions.
Patients continue to seek gender-affirming care in the post-Dobbs landscape.
Despite an increase in patient volume, wait times for gender diversity appointments decreased, likely reflecting expanded appointment availability around the time of the Dobbs decision.
.
Related Results
Changes in Support for Advance Provision and Over-the-Counter Access to Medication Abortion
Changes in Support for Advance Provision and Over-the-Counter Access to Medication Abortion
ImportanceSince Dobbs v Jackson Women’s Health Organization (Dobbs) removed federal abortion protections, people’s views about alternative models of abortion care may have been imp...
Autonomy on Trial
Autonomy on Trial
Photo by CHUTTERSNAP on Unsplash
Abstract
This paper critically examines how US bioethics and health law conceptualize patient autonomy, contrasting the rights-based, individualist...
(382) Online Trends for Vasectomy Inquiries following Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization Supreme Court Decision
(382) Online Trends for Vasectomy Inquiries following Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization Supreme Court Decision
Abstract
Introduction
On June 24th, 2022, the United States Supreme Court issued its decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health...
Anti-Dobbs
Anti-Dobbs
Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, rooted in an unarticulated patriarchy in the Supreme Court’s historical narrative, represents an untimely expression of deeply religio...
Gender identity development in autistic individuals: An interview study
Gender identity development in autistic individuals: An interview study
Autistic individuals report more gender-related questions and gender incongruence compared to non-autistic peers. However, research on gender identity in autistic individuals lacks...
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The UP Manila Health Policy Development Hub recognizes the invaluable contribution of the participants in theseries of roundtable discussions listed below:
RTD: Beyond Hospit...
Perceptions of Telemedicine and Rural Healthcare Access in a Developing Country: A Case Study of Bayelsa State, Nigeria
Perceptions of Telemedicine and Rural Healthcare Access in a Developing Country: A Case Study of Bayelsa State, Nigeria
Abstract
Introduction
Telemedicine is the remote delivery of healthcare services using information and communication technologies and has gained global recognition as a solution to...
Ehealth Communication
Ehealth Communication
Ehealth, also known as E-health, is a relatively new area of health communication inquiry that examines the development, implementation, and application of a broad range of evolvin...

