Javascript must be enabled to continue!
P1163Correction of septal flash excursion with his bundle pacing
View through CrossRef
Abstract
Funding Acknowledgements
Grant from the Catalan Society of Cardiology
Background
His bundle pacing (HBP) directly stimulates the conduction system and could therefore correct asynchrony and evolve as a more physiological pacing approach. Septal flash (SF) is a fast contraction and relaxation of the septum occurring during the isovolumetric contraction period. It is a specific marker of cardiac dyssynchrony.
Purpose
Evaluate whether HBP corrects SF in patients with an indication for CRT or RV pacing.
Methods
A cohort of 20 consecutive patients undergoing HBP at our center was analyzed. HBP indications were: Group A (n = 3): left bundle branch block (LBBB) and left ventricular (LV) dysfunction (LV ejection fraction [LVEF] < 35%); Group B (n = 14): LV dysfunction (LVEF < 50%) and atrio-ventricular block requiring permanent pacing; Group C (ablate&pace, n = 3): atrio-ventricular node ablation due to rapid atrial fibrillation.
Patients in groups B and C had a RV backup lead implanted, in line with current recommendations. The presence of SF was analyzed in 2D-echocardiography at 15 days post-implant. SF excursion was quantified using M-mode in parasternal short and long axis views as the highest amplitude of the early inward motion. Baseline SF excursion was determined during intrinsic rhythm (group A) or RV pacing (groups B and C). For each patient, the pair of measurements (baseline, HBP) in the axis with the highest baseline SF was selected.
Results
Mean LVEFs were 21 ± 8%, 32 ± 6%, and 41 ± 18% for groups A, B and C, respectively. HBP shortened QRS duration by 42 ± 15 ms and 45 ± 23 ms in groups A (Baseline QRS - HBP QRS) and B + C (RV pacing QRS - HBP QRS), respectively. At baseline, all patients except 1 had SF (Fig. 1A). The mean SF excursion was 4.3 ± 1.9 mm, with SF excursion being larger in group A than in the RV-paced groups (6.3 ± 1.5 mm vs. 3.9 ± 1.8 mm for groups A and B + C, respectively, p = 0.04). HBP abolished SF in 3 patients (15%) and, on average, decreased SF excursion by 2.3 mm (95% CI 1.3-3.2), irrespective of pacing indication (Fig. 1B). The degree of SF excursion reduction after HBP significantly correlated with QRS shortening (r = 0.53, p = 0.024) (Fig 1C).
Conclusions
In conclusion, we show that HBP results in acute correction or decrease of SF, thereby improving LBBB- or RV-induced mechanical dyssynchrony.
Abstract Figure. Septal Flash and His pacing
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Title: P1163Correction of septal flash excursion with his bundle pacing
Description:
Abstract
Funding Acknowledgements
Grant from the Catalan Society of Cardiology
Background
His bundle pacing (HBP) directly stimulates the conduction system and could therefore correct asynchrony and evolve as a more physiological pacing approach.
Septal flash (SF) is a fast contraction and relaxation of the septum occurring during the isovolumetric contraction period.
It is a specific marker of cardiac dyssynchrony.
Purpose
Evaluate whether HBP corrects SF in patients with an indication for CRT or RV pacing.
Methods
A cohort of 20 consecutive patients undergoing HBP at our center was analyzed.
HBP indications were: Group A (n = 3): left bundle branch block (LBBB) and left ventricular (LV) dysfunction (LV ejection fraction [LVEF] < 35%); Group B (n = 14): LV dysfunction (LVEF < 50%) and atrio-ventricular block requiring permanent pacing; Group C (ablate&pace, n = 3): atrio-ventricular node ablation due to rapid atrial fibrillation.
Patients in groups B and C had a RV backup lead implanted, in line with current recommendations.
The presence of SF was analyzed in 2D-echocardiography at 15 days post-implant.
SF excursion was quantified using M-mode in parasternal short and long axis views as the highest amplitude of the early inward motion.
Baseline SF excursion was determined during intrinsic rhythm (group A) or RV pacing (groups B and C).
For each patient, the pair of measurements (baseline, HBP) in the axis with the highest baseline SF was selected.
Results
Mean LVEFs were 21 ± 8%, 32 ± 6%, and 41 ± 18% for groups A, B and C, respectively.
HBP shortened QRS duration by 42 ± 15 ms and 45 ± 23 ms in groups A (Baseline QRS - HBP QRS) and B + C (RV pacing QRS - HBP QRS), respectively.
At baseline, all patients except 1 had SF (Fig.
1A).
The mean SF excursion was 4.
3 ± 1.
9 mm, with SF excursion being larger in group A than in the RV-paced groups (6.
3 ± 1.
5 mm vs.
3.
9 ± 1.
8 mm for groups A and B + C, respectively, p = 0.
04).
HBP abolished SF in 3 patients (15%) and, on average, decreased SF excursion by 2.
3 mm (95% CI 1.
3-3.
2), irrespective of pacing indication (Fig.
1B).
The degree of SF excursion reduction after HBP significantly correlated with QRS shortening (r = 0.
53, p = 0.
024) (Fig 1C).
Conclusions
In conclusion, we show that HBP results in acute correction or decrease of SF, thereby improving LBBB- or RV-induced mechanical dyssynchrony.
Abstract Figure.
Septal Flash and His pacing.
Related Results
e0650 The effects of biventricular synchronous pacing on CBF, MVO2 and CWE in dogs
e0650 The effects of biventricular synchronous pacing on CBF, MVO2 and CWE in dogs
Objective
To compare the effects of biventricular synchronous pacing with different pacing site on coronary Blood flow (CBF), myocardial oxygen consumption (MVO2)...
Approach to Left Bundle Branch Pacing
Approach to Left Bundle Branch Pacing
Cardiac pacing refers to the implantation tool serving as a treatment modality for various indications, the most common of which is symptomatic bradyarrhythmia. Left bundle branch ...
Acute Changes in Cardiac Synchrony and Output According to RV Pacing Sites in Koreans with Normal Cardiac Function
Acute Changes in Cardiac Synchrony and Output According to RV Pacing Sites in Koreans with Normal Cardiac Function
Introduction: The synchrony of the pacing heart can be affected by the right ventricular (RV) pacing site and is crucial to cardiac function in pacemaker recipients. We evaluated t...
Changes in pacing variation with increasing race duration in ultra-triathlon races
Changes in pacing variation with increasing race duration in ultra-triathlon races
Abstract
Background: Despite the increasing scientific interest in the relationship between pacing and performance in endurance sports, little information is available abou...
Left bundle branch area pacing: Electrocardiographic features
Left bundle branch area pacing: Electrocardiographic features
Background Left bundle branch (LBB) area pacing emerged as a promising
alternative to His bundle (HB) pacing in difficult cases of
physiological pacing and failed cases of cardiac ...
Long‐Term Follow‐up Impact of Dual‐Chamber Pacing on Patients with Hypertrophic Obstructive Cardiomyopathy
Long‐Term Follow‐up Impact of Dual‐Chamber Pacing on Patients with Hypertrophic Obstructive Cardiomyopathy
BackgroundPacing has been proposed as a treatment for patients with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy (HOCM), but there are few studies with long‐term follow‐up. We evaluated...
Effects of Right Ventricular Nonapical Pacing on Cardiac Function: A Meta‐analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Effects of Right Ventricular Nonapical Pacing on Cardiac Function: A Meta‐analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
BackgroundA meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was conducted to compare the effects of right ventricular nonapical (RVNA) and right ventricular apical (RVA) pacin...
The role of affect in pacing: experimental study
The role of affect in pacing: experimental study
People with chronic pain often change the way they carry out their daily activities according to different patterns, among which are pacing strategies. Cross-sectional studies on t...

