Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

THE FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLES OF RECUSAL OF A JUDGE AT COMMON LAW: RECENT DEVELOPMENTS

View through CrossRef
The common-law principle that no one should be a judge in his or her own cause is the basis upon which the rule against bias or apprehension of bias was founded. In constitutional parlance, this translates into the requirement that a judge or anyone under a duty to decide anything must be impartial, which is, in turn, the foundation for the recusal of a judge in adjudication. This cardinal principle of adjudication has produced an abundant case law indicating the circumstances in which a judge should, or ought to, recuse him- or herself on the ground of bias or reasonable apprehension of bias in common-law jurisdictions. This article focuses on the fundamental principles guiding the notion of recusal in the common-law courts. There is, first, a presumption of judicial impartiality, which is the preliminary but important hurdle an applicant for recusal of a judge must overcome. The inquiry proceeds no further if this presumption is not successfully rebutted early in the proceeding. The second hurdle is the test for recusal that the facts put forward in support of the allegation of bias or apparent bias must meet. This test is a two-dimensional reasonable standard test of a reasonably informed observer who would reasonably entertain an apprehension that the judge would (not might) be biased towards one party in the case. This test enables a court to determine whether the allegation of lack of judicial impartiality in any given case could lead to the recusal of the judge. The discussion that ensues is based on decided cases selected from specific Commonwealth jurisdictions where such matters have recently been dealt with. Indeed, these cases show that recusal of a judge in adjudication is, in practical terms, the application of the common-law principle of natural justice that a person cannot be a judge in his or her own cause. It is also a clear manifestation of the age-old adage that justice must not only be done, but must manifestly and undoubtedly be seen to be done.
Academy of Science of South Africa
Title: THE FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLES OF RECUSAL OF A JUDGE AT COMMON LAW: RECENT DEVELOPMENTS
Description:
The common-law principle that no one should be a judge in his or her own cause is the basis upon which the rule against bias or apprehension of bias was founded.
In constitutional parlance, this translates into the requirement that a judge or anyone under a duty to decide anything must be impartial, which is, in turn, the foundation for the recusal of a judge in adjudication.
This cardinal principle of adjudication has produced an abundant case law indicating the circumstances in which a judge should, or ought to, recuse him- or herself on the ground of bias or reasonable apprehension of bias in common-law jurisdictions.
This article focuses on the fundamental principles guiding the notion of recusal in the common-law courts.
There is, first, a presumption of judicial impartiality, which is the preliminary but important hurdle an applicant for recusal of a judge must overcome.
The inquiry proceeds no further if this presumption is not successfully rebutted early in the proceeding.
The second hurdle is the test for recusal that the facts put forward in support of the allegation of bias or apparent bias must meet.
This test is a two-dimensional reasonable standard test of a reasonably informed observer who would reasonably entertain an apprehension that the judge would (not might) be biased towards one party in the case.
This test enables a court to determine whether the allegation of lack of judicial impartiality in any given case could lead to the recusal of the judge.
The discussion that ensues is based on decided cases selected from specific Commonwealth jurisdictions where such matters have recently been dealt with.
Indeed, these cases show that recusal of a judge in adjudication is, in practical terms, the application of the common-law principle of natural justice that a person cannot be a judge in his or her own cause.
It is also a clear manifestation of the age-old adage that justice must not only be done, but must manifestly and undoubtedly be seen to be done.

Related Results

Envisioning Originalism Applied to Bioethics Cases
Envisioning Originalism Applied to Bioethics Cases
Photo ID 123697425 © Alexandersikov | Dreamstime.com Abstract Originalism is an increasingly prevalent method for interpreting provisions of the US Constitution. It requires strict...
Atypical business law provisions
Atypical business law provisions
The article is devoted to the vision of atypical business law provisions. It was found that the state of scientific opinion regarding atypical business law provisions is irrelevant...
Autonomy on Trial
Autonomy on Trial
Photo by CHUTTERSNAP on Unsplash Abstract This paper critically examines how US bioethics and health law conceptualize patient autonomy, contrasting the rights-based, individualist...
Principles of land law of Ukraine
Principles of land law of Ukraine
This article is devoted to topical issues of legal regulation of land relations in the state. One of the central issues of land relations in Ukraine - the issue of principles of l...
On the Status of Rights
On the Status of Rights
Photo by Patrick Tomasso on Unsplash ABSTRACT In cases where the law conflicts with bioethics, the status of rights must be determined to resolve some of the tensions. ...
Editorial: Complexity of Medical Law
Editorial: Complexity of Medical Law
If one puts forward a question what medical law is all about, the common answer will be medical mishaps as result of clinical negligence leading to lawsuit and/or inquires of disci...
ANKSI KEBIRI KIMIA BSAGI PELAKU KEJAHATAN SEKSUAL TERHADAP ANAK
ANKSI KEBIRI KIMIA BSAGI PELAKU KEJAHATAN SEKSUAL TERHADAP ANAK
Sexual crime case against children’s in Indonesia are increasing rapidly from time to time. The more tragic fact is that most of the suspect origins from their own kin or around ...
Posisi Hukum Adat dalam Hukum Kontrak Nasional Indonesia
Posisi Hukum Adat dalam Hukum Kontrak Nasional Indonesia
<p align="center"><strong><em>Abstract</em></strong></p><p><em>Sooner or later Indonesia will have its own law of contract. Reasons ...

Back to Top