Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Adaptive Partitioning of the tRNA Interaction Interface by Aminoacyl-tRNA-Synthetases

View through CrossRef
Abstract We introduce rugged fitness landscapes called match landscapes for the coevolution of feature-based assortative interactions between P ≥ 2 cognate pairs of tRNAs and aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (aaRSs) in aaRS-tRNA interaction networks. Our genotype-phenotype-fitness maps assume additive feature-matching energies, a macroscopic theory of aminoacylation kinetics including proofreading, and selection for translational accuracy in multiple, perfectly encoded site-types. We compute the stationary genotype distributions of finite panmictic, asexual populations of haploid aaRs-tRNA interaction networks evolving under mutation, genetic drift, and selection for cognate matching and non-cognate mismatching of aaRS-tRNA pairs. We compared expected genotype frequencies under different matching rules and fitness functions, both with and without linked site-specific modifiers of interaction. Under selection for translational accuracy alone, our model predicts no selection on modifiers to eliminate non-cognate interactions, so long as they are compensated by tighter cognate interactions. Only under combined selection for both translational accuracy and rate do modifiers adaptively eliminate cross-matching in non-cognate aaRS/tRNA pairs. We theorize that the encoding of macromolecular interaction networks is a genetic language that symbolically maps identifying structural and dynamic features of genes and gene-products to functions within cells. Our theory helps explain 1) the remarkable divergence in how aaRSs bind tRNAs, 2) why interaction-informative features are phylogenetically informative, 3) why the Statistical Tree of Life became more tree-like after the Darwinian Transition, and 4) an approach towards computing the probability of the random origin of an interaction network.
Title: Adaptive Partitioning of the tRNA Interaction Interface by Aminoacyl-tRNA-Synthetases
Description:
Abstract We introduce rugged fitness landscapes called match landscapes for the coevolution of feature-based assortative interactions between P ≥ 2 cognate pairs of tRNAs and aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (aaRSs) in aaRS-tRNA interaction networks.
Our genotype-phenotype-fitness maps assume additive feature-matching energies, a macroscopic theory of aminoacylation kinetics including proofreading, and selection for translational accuracy in multiple, perfectly encoded site-types.
We compute the stationary genotype distributions of finite panmictic, asexual populations of haploid aaRs-tRNA interaction networks evolving under mutation, genetic drift, and selection for cognate matching and non-cognate mismatching of aaRS-tRNA pairs.
We compared expected genotype frequencies under different matching rules and fitness functions, both with and without linked site-specific modifiers of interaction.
Under selection for translational accuracy alone, our model predicts no selection on modifiers to eliminate non-cognate interactions, so long as they are compensated by tighter cognate interactions.
Only under combined selection for both translational accuracy and rate do modifiers adaptively eliminate cross-matching in non-cognate aaRS/tRNA pairs.
We theorize that the encoding of macromolecular interaction networks is a genetic language that symbolically maps identifying structural and dynamic features of genes and gene-products to functions within cells.
Our theory helps explain 1) the remarkable divergence in how aaRSs bind tRNAs, 2) why interaction-informative features are phylogenetically informative, 3) why the Statistical Tree of Life became more tree-like after the Darwinian Transition, and 4) an approach towards computing the probability of the random origin of an interaction network.

Related Results

Multienzyme complexes of eukaryotic aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases
Multienzyme complexes of eukaryotic aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases
The high-molecular-mass aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase complexes in higher eukaryotes are discrete non-artifactual multienzyme complexes of similar composition which can be purified fro...
A novel pathway for the conversion of homocysteine to methionine in eukaryotes
A novel pathway for the conversion of homocysteine to methionine in eukaryotes
Activation of amino acid homocysteine was compared with that of methionine in rabbit crude liver extracts and purified multi-enzyme complex of aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases. Activatio...
Drop-off-reinitiation triggered by EF-G-driven mistranslocation and its alleviation by EF-P
Drop-off-reinitiation triggered by EF-G-driven mistranslocation and its alleviation by EF-P
Abstract In ribosomal translation, peptidyl transfer occurs between P-site peptidyl-tRNA and A-site aminoacyl-tRNA, followed by translocation of the resulting P-site...
A eukaryote without tRNA introns
A eukaryote without tRNA introns
One of the striking characteristics of eukaryotic genomes is the presence of three types of introns: spliceosomal introns, tRNA introns, and a unique intron in the XBP1 mRNA. Excep...
EXOSC10-mediated pre-tRNA surveillance safeguards neuron survival
EXOSC10-mediated pre-tRNA surveillance safeguards neuron survival
ABSTRACT tRNA quality control pathways have been identified in yeast, whereby aberrant and hypomodified mature tRNAs are targeted for 5’-3’ degra...
Aminoacyl Transfer Ribonucleic Acid Synthetases from Cell-Free Extract of Plasmodium berghei
Aminoacyl Transfer Ribonucleic Acid Synthetases from Cell-Free Extract of Plasmodium berghei
Aminoacyl transfer ribonucleic acid synthetases for leucine, tyrosine, histidine, valine, proline, threonine, and lysine were obtained from cell-free extract of Plasmod...
Aminoacyl‐tRNA synthetase – a molecular multitasker
Aminoacyl‐tRNA synthetase – a molecular multitasker
Abstract Aminoacyl‐tRNA synthetases (AaRSs) are valuable “housekeeping” enzymes that ensure the accurate transmission of genetic information in living cells, wher...

Back to Top