Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Abstract PR006: Evolution of evolvability
View through CrossRef
Abstract
The purpose of this work is to better understand how the rate of phenotypic adaptation of cells in a tumor affects its ability to survive treatment. Drug resistance is an ongoing problem for maintaining a sustained response in treating advanced cancers. Regardless of their lineage, heritable phenotypic adaptions may be beneficial for the tumor to survive stepwise changes in the environment during tumor growth. There may be further benefit for cells to develop the trait of being adaptable - to respond to large shifts in the microenvironment, survive metastasis to a new organ, and thrive when treatments are applied. Genomic instability and phenotypic redundancy may aid in adaptations, but there may be limits. With too much mutation and deviation from the parental phenotype, cells lose important regulatory and maintenance functions necessary to survive. So is there an optimal rate of evolvability? We use an off-lattice agent-based model to investigate how the rate of change through phenotypic trait space affects tumor growth and response to treatment. We assign cells with different combinations of proliferation rates and migration speeds and test how the variance from the parental cell on division affects the selection of trait combinations over time. During growth, heterogeneity is gained quickly and space matters less if evolvability is forced to continually increase, but there is more selection for proliferative phenotypes and slower evolvability if its rate is allowed to drift freely. We found that tradeoffs generally imposed a greater selection force leading to faster recurrence and the coexistence of proliferation or migration specialists. We compared responses to continuous, intermittent, and adaptive treatment schedules of an anti-proliferative drug. At some point with treatment, there is an optimal evolvability, as larger increases in diversity allows for cells to fall back into a sensitive state and be killed by treatment. We aim to design better treatment strategies that work for tumors with different levels of evolvability by understanding how the rate of tumor evolution affects growth and treatment response.
Citation Format: Jill A. Gallaher, Maximilian Strobl, Jeffrey West, Mark Roberston-Tessi, Alexander R. A. Anderson. Evolution of evolvability [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference in Cancer Research: Translating Cancer Evolution and Data Science: The Next Frontier; 2023 Dec 3-6; Boston, Massachusetts. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(3 Suppl_2):Abstract nr PR006.
American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Title: Abstract PR006: Evolution of evolvability
Description:
Abstract
The purpose of this work is to better understand how the rate of phenotypic adaptation of cells in a tumor affects its ability to survive treatment.
Drug resistance is an ongoing problem for maintaining a sustained response in treating advanced cancers.
Regardless of their lineage, heritable phenotypic adaptions may be beneficial for the tumor to survive stepwise changes in the environment during tumor growth.
There may be further benefit for cells to develop the trait of being adaptable - to respond to large shifts in the microenvironment, survive metastasis to a new organ, and thrive when treatments are applied.
Genomic instability and phenotypic redundancy may aid in adaptations, but there may be limits.
With too much mutation and deviation from the parental phenotype, cells lose important regulatory and maintenance functions necessary to survive.
So is there an optimal rate of evolvability? We use an off-lattice agent-based model to investigate how the rate of change through phenotypic trait space affects tumor growth and response to treatment.
We assign cells with different combinations of proliferation rates and migration speeds and test how the variance from the parental cell on division affects the selection of trait combinations over time.
During growth, heterogeneity is gained quickly and space matters less if evolvability is forced to continually increase, but there is more selection for proliferative phenotypes and slower evolvability if its rate is allowed to drift freely.
We found that tradeoffs generally imposed a greater selection force leading to faster recurrence and the coexistence of proliferation or migration specialists.
We compared responses to continuous, intermittent, and adaptive treatment schedules of an anti-proliferative drug.
At some point with treatment, there is an optimal evolvability, as larger increases in diversity allows for cells to fall back into a sensitive state and be killed by treatment.
We aim to design better treatment strategies that work for tumors with different levels of evolvability by understanding how the rate of tumor evolution affects growth and treatment response.
Citation Format: Jill A.
Gallaher, Maximilian Strobl, Jeffrey West, Mark Roberston-Tessi, Alexander R.
A.
Anderson.
Evolution of evolvability [abstract].
In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference in Cancer Research: Translating Cancer Evolution and Data Science: The Next Frontier; 2023 Dec 3-6; Boston, Massachusetts.
Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(3 Suppl_2):Abstract nr PR006.
Related Results
Colonization of a novel host plant reduces phenotypic variation
Colonization of a novel host plant reduces phenotypic variation
Abstract
Understanding the evolutionary potential of populations –evolvability– is key to predicting their ability to cope with novel environment...
Protein Dynamism and Evolvability
Protein Dynamism and Evolvability
The traditional view that proteins possess absolute functional specificity and a single, fixed structure conflicts with their marked ability to adapt and evolve new functions and s...
Evolutionary Potential of Herkogamy
Evolutionary Potential of Herkogamy
AbstractHerkogamy, the spatial separation of male and female sexual functions in flowers, is an important floral trait mediating variation in plant mating systems. Understanding th...
Comparing evolvability and pleiotropy across environments
Comparing evolvability and pleiotropy across environments
Abstract
The environment can play an important role in determining evolutionary outcomes (Reboud and Bell 1997; Stanton et al. 2000; Gresham et al. 2008; Cooper and...
UNFOLDing Robustness, Plasticity, Evolvability and Canalisation of Biological Function
UNFOLDing Robustness, Plasticity, Evolvability and Canalisation of Biological Function
Abstract
A unique balance of seemingly contradictory properties like robustness and plasticity, or evolvability and functional canalisation, characterises biologica...
Experimental evolution of evolvability
Experimental evolution of evolvability
Abstract
Capacity to generate adaptive variation can evolve by natural selection. However, the idea that mutation becomes biased toward specific adaptive outcomes i...
Refactoring the Genetic Code for Increased Evolvability
Refactoring the Genetic Code for Increased Evolvability
Abstract
The standard genetic code is robust to mutations and base-pairing errors during transcription and translation. Point mutations are most likely to be synony...
Ecological effects of stress drive bacterial evolvability under sub-inhibitory antibiotic treatments
Ecological effects of stress drive bacterial evolvability under sub-inhibitory antibiotic treatments
1
Abstract
Stress is thought to increase mutation rate and thus to accelerate evolution. In the context of antibiotic resistance, sub-inhibitory tre...

