Hydrophobic Effects on Antibacterial and Channel‐forming Properties of Cecropin A–Melittin Hybrids

AbstractThe design of cecropin–melittin hybrid analogues is of interest due to the similarities in the structure of the antimicrobial peptides cecropin and melittin but differences in their lytic properties. We suspected that a hydrophobic residue in position 2 of milittin (Ile8 in the hybrid) plays an important role in the activity of the 15‐residue hybrid, KWKLFKKIGAVLKVL‐NH2, [CA(1–7)M(2–9)NH2] and have now examined its role in the analogue toward five test bacteria. Deletion of Ile8 reduced activity, and it was not restored by lengthening to 15 residues by addition of another threonine at the C‐terminus. Replacement of Ile8 by a hydrophobic leucine maintained good activity and Ala8 was equally active for four organisms, although less active against Staphylococcus aureus. Replacement by the hydrophilic Ser8 strongly reduced potency against all five organisms. Deletion of Leu15 decreased activity, but addition of Thr16 maintained good activity. The presence of hydrophobic residues appears to have a significant effect on the process of antibacterial activity. These peptide analogues showed voltage‐dependent conductance changes and are capable of forming ion‐pores in planar lipid bilayers. The antibacterial action of the peptides is thought to be first an ionic interaction with the anionic phosphate groups of the membrane followed by interaction with the hydrocarbon core of the membrane and subsequent reorientation into amphipathic α‐helical peptides that form pores (ion‐channels), which span the membrane. The analogue also showed an increase in α‐helicity with an increase in hexafluoro 2‐propanol concentration.