Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Comparison of muscle activation of hip belt squat and barbell back squat techniques
View through CrossRef
BACKGROUND: Hip belt squats are believed to have been introduced in 1970. By removing the load from the shoulders and upper trapezius, the hip belt squat places emphasis on the legs with less load on the spine. No peer-reviewed research exists on the muscle recruitment patterns of a hip belt squat, or how it compares in muscle activation to other squatting activities.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the study was to determine lower extremity muscle activation in a hip belt squat (SquatMax = MD) in comparison with a barbell back squat.
METHODS: Thirteen participants performed four repetitions of an 8-RM squat using three different techniques: hip belt squat without a band, hip belt squat with a band, and barbell back squat. Electromyographic data were collected from six muscles: quadriceps, biceps femoris, hip adductors, hip abductors, gluteus maximus, and gastrocnemius.
RESULTS: ANOVA revealed no significant difference in muscle activity between devices. The only muscle group statistically different between genders was the gastrocnemius (p = 0.04). Hip adductor activity was lowest and hip abductor activity was highest when performing a hip belt squat with the band for both genders. Likewise, the adductor to hamstring ratio was lowest with the hip belt squat.
CONCLUSIONS: Given the lack of significant difference in the muscle activity between the squat techniques, one needs to look at other attributes to determine both the scientific and, consequently, the practical value. Given the placement of the belt around the pelvis, one positive attribute for the hip belt squat is the ability to unload the shoulders and spine. Another positive attribute for the hip belt squat is the higher hip abductor to adductor ratio. This could be very important for injury prevention and patella tracking. While the back squat has slightly higher hamstring recruitment, which is important in ACL injury prevention, the hip belt squat may address this by offsetting the free weight with the use of an additional band. If a free weight hip belt squat device is available, it may be a better alternative to the traditional barbell squat technique.
SAGE Publications
Title: Comparison of muscle activation of hip belt squat and barbell back squat techniques
Description:
BACKGROUND: Hip belt squats are believed to have been introduced in 1970.
By removing the load from the shoulders and upper trapezius, the hip belt squat places emphasis on the legs with less load on the spine.
No peer-reviewed research exists on the muscle recruitment patterns of a hip belt squat, or how it compares in muscle activation to other squatting activities.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the study was to determine lower extremity muscle activation in a hip belt squat (SquatMax = MD) in comparison with a barbell back squat.
METHODS: Thirteen participants performed four repetitions of an 8-RM squat using three different techniques: hip belt squat without a band, hip belt squat with a band, and barbell back squat.
Electromyographic data were collected from six muscles: quadriceps, biceps femoris, hip adductors, hip abductors, gluteus maximus, and gastrocnemius.
RESULTS: ANOVA revealed no significant difference in muscle activity between devices.
The only muscle group statistically different between genders was the gastrocnemius (p = 0.
04).
Hip adductor activity was lowest and hip abductor activity was highest when performing a hip belt squat with the band for both genders.
Likewise, the adductor to hamstring ratio was lowest with the hip belt squat.
CONCLUSIONS: Given the lack of significant difference in the muscle activity between the squat techniques, one needs to look at other attributes to determine both the scientific and, consequently, the practical value.
Given the placement of the belt around the pelvis, one positive attribute for the hip belt squat is the ability to unload the shoulders and spine.
Another positive attribute for the hip belt squat is the higher hip abductor to adductor ratio.
This could be very important for injury prevention and patella tracking.
While the back squat has slightly higher hamstring recruitment, which is important in ACL injury prevention, the hip belt squat may address this by offsetting the free weight with the use of an additional band.
If a free weight hip belt squat device is available, it may be a better alternative to the traditional barbell squat technique.
Related Results
Physiological and biomechanical factors contributing to the hip adduction angle in female runners
Physiological and biomechanical factors contributing to the hip adduction angle in female runners
Running is a popular form of exercise that is accompanied by many health benefits. However, running also comes with a risk of overuse injuries. Women have a higher risk for overuse...
Poster 247: Muscle ERRγ Overexpression Mitigates the Muscle Atrophy after ACL injury
Poster 247: Muscle ERRγ Overexpression Mitigates the Muscle Atrophy after ACL injury
Objectives:
Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is the 6th most common orthopedic procedure performed in the United States (1,2). There is substanti...
Comparison of muscle activation of 3 different hip belt squat techniques
Comparison of muscle activation of 3 different hip belt squat techniques
The purpose of this study was to differentiate between muscular activity of three different types of belt squats (SquatMax-MD, Pit Shark and Monster Rhino) and the muscle activatio...
Mix En Meng It Op: Emile YX?'s Alternative Race and Language Politics in South African Hip-Hop
Mix En Meng It Op: Emile YX?'s Alternative Race and Language Politics in South African Hip-Hop
This paper explores South African hip-hop activist Emile YX?'s work to suggest that he presents an alternative take on mainstream US and South African hip-hop. While it is arguable...
Association of Hip Radiograph Findings With Pain and Function in Patients Presenting With Low Back Pain
Association of Hip Radiograph Findings With Pain and Function in Patients Presenting With Low Back Pain
AbstractBackgroundRelationships between low back pain (LBP) and the hip in patient cohorts have been described primarily in patients with moderate to severe hip osteoarthritis (OA)...
Parasites and other symbionts of squat lobsters
Parasites and other symbionts of squat lobsters
Squat lobsters (members of the anomuran superfamilies Chirostyloidea and Galatheoidea) are known as hosts for a variety of symbiotic organisms, particularly parasites. One hundred ...
DXA-derived hip shape is associated with hip fracture: a longitudinal study of 38,123 UK Biobank participants
DXA-derived hip shape is associated with hip fracture: a longitudinal study of 38,123 UK Biobank participants
Abstract
Despite advancements in fracture prediction tools and osteoporosis management, hip fractures remain a significant consequence of bone fr...
Females Present Different Single-Leg Squat Kinematics and Muscle Activation Strategies than Males Even after Hip Abductor Fatigue
Females Present Different Single-Leg Squat Kinematics and Muscle Activation Strategies than Males Even after Hip Abductor Fatigue
Background: Despite the potential connection between hip and knee muscle control, there is limited research on the effects of hip abductor fatigue on the hip and knee neuromuscular...

