Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Tack in Rubber
View through CrossRef
Abstract
The expressions tack, tackiness, and stickiness have been in use since the beginning of the rubber industry. During the years their meaning has changed considerably. The first occasion where tackiness was mentioned was in the case of crude natural rubber. The surface of the rubber became tacky or sticky during storage. This phenomenon has been thoroughly discussed in the literature. As a general conclusion it was accepted that both oxidation and depolymerisation occurred. Three factors were reported to be the cause of these processes: light, traces of copper, and manganese. From our point of view we would call this effect stickiness, as we are only interested in the building tack of rubber. In the period when the only rubber was natural rubber and high loadings of highly active fillers were not generally used in compounds, building tack was no problem. Building tack was first mentioned in a publication by Griffith and Jones in 1928. They started their experiments by measuring tack in their search for methods to prevent cotton liners from sticking to unvulcanized rubber. One would have expected much work on the measurement and improvement of tack in Germany and Russia during the development of synthetic rubbers. However, this only proved to be the case in Russia. The first publication available was the translation of an article by Voyutskii and Margolina in 1957. From Voyutskii's work we were able to trace the first article in 1935 by Zhukov and Talmud, who studied the adhesive power of synthetic rubber. In the USA the first theoretical approach to the subject was by Josefowitz and Mark in 1942, who at that time did not realize the difference between stickiness and tack. This difference became clear when lack of tack became the big problem in the use of synthetic rubber. In many cases it was found that addition of resins and softeners gave a very sticky compound which had no building tack at all. The tack problem was first discussed at the ASTM symposium on the application of synthetic rubbers in 1944 by Juve who gave a definition of building tack. From that time, the problem has been studied regularly, especially from the practical side, to find ways and means to improve the building tack of synthetic rubbers.
Title: Tack in Rubber
Description:
Abstract
The expressions tack, tackiness, and stickiness have been in use since the beginning of the rubber industry.
During the years their meaning has changed considerably.
The first occasion where tackiness was mentioned was in the case of crude natural rubber.
The surface of the rubber became tacky or sticky during storage.
This phenomenon has been thoroughly discussed in the literature.
As a general conclusion it was accepted that both oxidation and depolymerisation occurred.
Three factors were reported to be the cause of these processes: light, traces of copper, and manganese.
From our point of view we would call this effect stickiness, as we are only interested in the building tack of rubber.
In the period when the only rubber was natural rubber and high loadings of highly active fillers were not generally used in compounds, building tack was no problem.
Building tack was first mentioned in a publication by Griffith and Jones in 1928.
They started their experiments by measuring tack in their search for methods to prevent cotton liners from sticking to unvulcanized rubber.
One would have expected much work on the measurement and improvement of tack in Germany and Russia during the development of synthetic rubbers.
However, this only proved to be the case in Russia.
The first publication available was the translation of an article by Voyutskii and Margolina in 1957.
From Voyutskii's work we were able to trace the first article in 1935 by Zhukov and Talmud, who studied the adhesive power of synthetic rubber.
In the USA the first theoretical approach to the subject was by Josefowitz and Mark in 1942, who at that time did not realize the difference between stickiness and tack.
This difference became clear when lack of tack became the big problem in the use of synthetic rubber.
In many cases it was found that addition of resins and softeners gave a very sticky compound which had no building tack at all.
The tack problem was first discussed at the ASTM symposium on the application of synthetic rubbers in 1944 by Juve who gave a definition of building tack.
From that time, the problem has been studied regularly, especially from the practical side, to find ways and means to improve the building tack of synthetic rubbers.
Related Results
Relationship between the Cohesive Strength and the Tack of Elastomers: Part II, Contact Time Effects
Relationship between the Cohesive Strength and the Tack of Elastomers: Part II, Contact Time Effects
Abstract
The self-tack (also called autohesion or simply tack) of an elastomer is its ability to resist separation from another piece of the same elastomer compound with wh...
Relationship between the cohesive strength and the tack of elastomers
Relationship between the cohesive strength and the tack of elastomers
AbstractThe autohesion (tack) and cohesion of a random styrene‐butadiene elastomer have been examined as a function of test temperature and speed using a T‐peel geometry. Both prop...
Flow Criterion for Elastomer Tack
Flow Criterion for Elastomer Tack
Abstract
In order to form a tack bond, the first step is to establish molecular contact between the two sample surfaces. This requires viscous flow of material near the sur...
Tack and Related Properties of Isopropyl Azodicarboxylate Modified Polybutadiene
Tack and Related Properties of Isopropyl Azodicarboxylate Modified Polybutadiene
Abstract
Polybutadiene has been modified by reaction with isopropyl azodicarboxylate (IAD). The reaction is quite efficient, resulting in a structure in which there are pen...
Processing rubber latex (Hevea brasiliensis) in agroforestry in Menggala Mas Village, Tulang Bawang Tengah District, Tulang Bawang Barat Regency
Processing rubber latex (Hevea brasiliensis) in agroforestry in Menggala Mas Village, Tulang Bawang Tengah District, Tulang Bawang Barat Regency
Local knowledge of rubber latex processing is important for village communities that depend on rubber plants for their livelihood. This research aims to determine the processing of...
Rubber plantation labor and labor movements as rubber prices decrease in southern Thailand
Rubber plantation labor and labor movements as rubber prices decrease in southern Thailand
A decrease in rubber prices can initiate labor migration trends from rubber production to industrial or service sectors, which could further cause labor shortages in rubber product...
EFFECTS OF MANAGEMENT PRACTICES AND TAPPING SYSTEM ON LATEX AND DRY RUBBER YIELDS OF RUBBER TREE CLONE RRIT 251
EFFECTS OF MANAGEMENT PRACTICES AND TAPPING SYSTEM ON LATEX AND DRY RUBBER YIELDS OF RUBBER TREE CLONE RRIT 251
The cultivation of Hevea brasiliensis, as the main source of natural rubber, is facing the tapping labor shortage and low dry rubber yield problems. Management practices and tappin...
Sodium Hydroxide Treatment of Waste Rubber Crumb and Its Effects on Properties of Unsaturated Polyester Composites
Sodium Hydroxide Treatment of Waste Rubber Crumb and Its Effects on Properties of Unsaturated Polyester Composites
This study investigated the optimum NaOH concentration treatment for rubber crumbs that improves adhesion between the polymer matrix and rubber filler in rubber polyester composite...

