Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Tack in Rubber

View through CrossRef
Abstract The expressions tack, tackiness, and stickiness have been in use since the beginning of the rubber industry. During the years their meaning has changed considerably. The first occasion where tackiness was mentioned was in the case of crude natural rubber. The surface of the rubber became tacky or sticky during storage. This phenomenon has been thoroughly discussed in the literature. As a general conclusion it was accepted that both oxidation and depolymerisation occurred. Three factors were reported to be the cause of these processes: light, traces of copper, and manganese. From our point of view we would call this effect stickiness, as we are only interested in the building tack of rubber. In the period when the only rubber was natural rubber and high loadings of highly active fillers were not generally used in compounds, building tack was no problem. Building tack was first mentioned in a publication by Griffith and Jones in 1928. They started their experiments by measuring tack in their search for methods to prevent cotton liners from sticking to unvulcanized rubber. One would have expected much work on the measurement and improvement of tack in Germany and Russia during the development of synthetic rubbers. However, this only proved to be the case in Russia. The first publication available was the translation of an article by Voyutskii and Margolina in 1957. From Voyutskii's work we were able to trace the first article in 1935 by Zhukov and Talmud, who studied the adhesive power of synthetic rubber. In the USA the first theoretical approach to the subject was by Josefowitz and Mark in 1942, who at that time did not realize the difference between stickiness and tack. This difference became clear when lack of tack became the big problem in the use of synthetic rubber. In many cases it was found that addition of resins and softeners gave a very sticky compound which had no building tack at all. The tack problem was first discussed at the ASTM symposium on the application of synthetic rubbers in 1944 by Juve who gave a definition of building tack. From that time, the problem has been studied regularly, especially from the practical side, to find ways and means to improve the building tack of synthetic rubbers.
Title: Tack in Rubber
Description:
Abstract The expressions tack, tackiness, and stickiness have been in use since the beginning of the rubber industry.
During the years their meaning has changed considerably.
The first occasion where tackiness was mentioned was in the case of crude natural rubber.
The surface of the rubber became tacky or sticky during storage.
This phenomenon has been thoroughly discussed in the literature.
As a general conclusion it was accepted that both oxidation and depolymerisation occurred.
Three factors were reported to be the cause of these processes: light, traces of copper, and manganese.
From our point of view we would call this effect stickiness, as we are only interested in the building tack of rubber.
In the period when the only rubber was natural rubber and high loadings of highly active fillers were not generally used in compounds, building tack was no problem.
Building tack was first mentioned in a publication by Griffith and Jones in 1928.
They started their experiments by measuring tack in their search for methods to prevent cotton liners from sticking to unvulcanized rubber.
One would have expected much work on the measurement and improvement of tack in Germany and Russia during the development of synthetic rubbers.
However, this only proved to be the case in Russia.
The first publication available was the translation of an article by Voyutskii and Margolina in 1957.
From Voyutskii's work we were able to trace the first article in 1935 by Zhukov and Talmud, who studied the adhesive power of synthetic rubber.
In the USA the first theoretical approach to the subject was by Josefowitz and Mark in 1942, who at that time did not realize the difference between stickiness and tack.
This difference became clear when lack of tack became the big problem in the use of synthetic rubber.
In many cases it was found that addition of resins and softeners gave a very sticky compound which had no building tack at all.
The tack problem was first discussed at the ASTM symposium on the application of synthetic rubbers in 1944 by Juve who gave a definition of building tack.
From that time, the problem has been studied regularly, especially from the practical side, to find ways and means to improve the building tack of synthetic rubbers.

Related Results

Rubber plantation labor and labor movements as rubber prices decrease in southern Thailand
Rubber plantation labor and labor movements as rubber prices decrease in southern Thailand
A decrease in rubber prices can initiate labor migration trends from rubber production to industrial or service sectors, which could further cause labor shortages in rubber product...
EFFECTS OF MANAGEMENT PRACTICES AND TAPPING SYSTEM ON LATEX AND DRY RUBBER YIELDS OF RUBBER TREE CLONE RRIT 251
EFFECTS OF MANAGEMENT PRACTICES AND TAPPING SYSTEM ON LATEX AND DRY RUBBER YIELDS OF RUBBER TREE CLONE RRIT 251
The cultivation of Hevea brasiliensis, as the main source of natural rubber, is facing the tapping labor shortage and low dry rubber yield problems. Management practices and tappin...
Sodium Hydroxide Treatment of Waste Rubber Crumb and Its Effects on Properties of Unsaturated Polyester Composites
Sodium Hydroxide Treatment of Waste Rubber Crumb and Its Effects on Properties of Unsaturated Polyester Composites
This study investigated the optimum NaOH concentration treatment for rubber crumbs that improves adhesion between the polymer matrix and rubber filler in rubber polyester composite...
Rubber Degrading Strains: Microtetraspora and Dactylosporangium
Rubber Degrading Strains: Microtetraspora and Dactylosporangium
Rubber composed of highly unsaturated hydrocarbons, modified through addition of chemicals and vulcanization are widely used to date. However, the usage of rubber, faces many obsta...
Rubbone
Rubbone
Abstract Of all the reactions which natural rubber undergoes, oxidation next to vulcanization, may be said to rank in the first place. For not only does the life and useful...
Independent and Dependent Variable: Influence on Jambi Province Rubber Exports
Independent and Dependent Variable: Influence on Jambi Province Rubber Exports
Introduction/Main Objectives: This study was conducted to determine the effect of processed rubber production (X1), world rubber prices (X2), and exchange rates (X3) on the value o...
Pengenalan Segmentasi Pasar Demi Meningkatkan Wawasan Petani Karet Di Desa Parsarmaan
Pengenalan Segmentasi Pasar Demi Meningkatkan Wawasan Petani Karet Di Desa Parsarmaan
Objektif. Rubber is the main commodity developed in Parsarmaan Village, and to optimize their production results, as well as increase the sustainability of the rubber industry, a b...

Back to Top