Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Compatibilization of Two Immiscible Homopolymers

View through CrossRef
More often than not, the mechanical properties (e.g., impact and tensile properties) of immiscible polymer blends are very poor owing to the lack of adhesion between the constituent components, which originates from strong repulsive thermodynamic (segmental) interactions. Therefore, in the past, a great deal of effort (Barlow and Paul 1984; Fayt and Teyssie 1989; Fayt et al. 1981, 1987, 1989; Gupta and Purwar 1985; Ouhadi et al. 1986a; Park et al. 1992; Schwarz et al. 1988, 1989; Srinivasan and Gupta 1994; Traugott et al. 1983) has been made to improve the mechanical properties of two immiscible polymers by adding a third component (e.g., a block copolymer). In this chapter, we confine our attention primarily to the situations where a nonreactive third component is added to two immiscible homopolymers in order to improve their mechanical properties. A polymer blend consisting of two immiscible homopolymers (say, A and B) has a very narrow interface, as schematically shown in Figure 4.1, because they have strong repulsive segmental interactions giving rise to a positive value of the Flory–Huggins interaction parameter (χ), i.e., χAB > 0. Helfand and Tagami (1971, 1972) derived the following expression relating the interfacial thickness d of a pair of immiscible homopolymers of infinite molecular weight to χ: . . . d = 2b/(6χ)1/2 (4.1). . . where the Kuhn length b is assumed to be the same for both components. They also derived an expression for the interfacial tension γ between two immiscible homopolymers: . . . γ = (χ/6)1/2bρokBT . . . in terms of χ, where kB is the Boltzmann constant, T is the absolute temperature, and ρo is the reference density (the inverse of monomeric volume of a reference component). Equation (4.1) indicates that the interfacial thickness between two immiscible homopolymers will be larger when the extent of repulsive segmental interactions is less, and Eq. (4.2) indicates that the interfacial tension between two immiscible homopolymers will be lower when the extent of repulsive segmental interactions is less.
Title: Compatibilization of Two Immiscible Homopolymers
Description:
More often than not, the mechanical properties (e.
g.
, impact and tensile properties) of immiscible polymer blends are very poor owing to the lack of adhesion between the constituent components, which originates from strong repulsive thermodynamic (segmental) interactions.
Therefore, in the past, a great deal of effort (Barlow and Paul 1984; Fayt and Teyssie 1989; Fayt et al.
1981, 1987, 1989; Gupta and Purwar 1985; Ouhadi et al.
1986a; Park et al.
1992; Schwarz et al.
1988, 1989; Srinivasan and Gupta 1994; Traugott et al.
1983) has been made to improve the mechanical properties of two immiscible polymers by adding a third component (e.
g.
, a block copolymer).
In this chapter, we confine our attention primarily to the situations where a nonreactive third component is added to two immiscible homopolymers in order to improve their mechanical properties.
A polymer blend consisting of two immiscible homopolymers (say, A and B) has a very narrow interface, as schematically shown in Figure 4.
1, because they have strong repulsive segmental interactions giving rise to a positive value of the Flory–Huggins interaction parameter (χ), i.
e.
, χAB > 0.
Helfand and Tagami (1971, 1972) derived the following expression relating the interfacial thickness d of a pair of immiscible homopolymers of infinite molecular weight to χ: .
.
.
d = 2b/(6χ)1/2 (4.
1).
.
.
where the Kuhn length b is assumed to be the same for both components.
They also derived an expression for the interfacial tension γ between two immiscible homopolymers: .
.
.
γ = (χ/6)1/2bρokBT .
.
.
in terms of χ, where kB is the Boltzmann constant, T is the absolute temperature, and ρo is the reference density (the inverse of monomeric volume of a reference component).
Equation (4.
1) indicates that the interfacial thickness between two immiscible homopolymers will be larger when the extent of repulsive segmental interactions is less, and Eq.
(4.
2) indicates that the interfacial tension between two immiscible homopolymers will be lower when the extent of repulsive segmental interactions is less.

Related Results

Rheology of Flexible Homopolymers
Rheology of Flexible Homopolymers
Abstract Numerous flexible homopolymers and flexible random copolymers are commercially available. Thus, understandably, a number of research groups have reported on...
Rheology of Immiscible Polymer Blends
Rheology of Immiscible Polymer Blends
Abstract The polymer industry has been challenged to produce new polymeric materials by blending two or more homopolymers or random copolymers or by synthesizing gra...
Numerical simulation of multiphase immiscible flow on unstructured meshes
Numerical simulation of multiphase immiscible flow on unstructured meshes
The present thesis aims at developing a basis for the numerical simulation of multiphase flows of immiscible fluids. This approach, although limited by the computational power of t...
Phase behavior of triblock copolymer and homopolymer blends: Effect of copolymer topology
Phase behavior of triblock copolymer and homopolymer blends: Effect of copolymer topology
Two distinct linear triblock copolymers with different block sequences, ABA or BAB, are obtained when two identical AB diblock copolymers are jointed at their B or A ends, respecti...
Processing, structure, and property relationships in reactively compatibilized heterogeneous multicomponent polyolefin blends
Processing, structure, and property relationships in reactively compatibilized heterogeneous multicomponent polyolefin blends
This study investigates the relationships between processing conditions, structural evolution, and macroscopic properties in highly heterogeneous multicomponent polyolefin blends s...
Lattice Boltzmann simulation of immiscible displacement in the complex micro-channel
Lattice Boltzmann simulation of immiscible displacement in the complex micro-channel
The immiscible displacement process in micro-channel, which widely existes in daily life and industrial production, is an important research subject. This subject is a typical cont...
Differential migration of interstitial immiscible liquids in the Skaergaard Layered Series
Differential migration of interstitial immiscible liquids in the Skaergaard Layered Series
<p>The liquid line of descent of the Skaergaard magma intersects a binodal creating an immiscible conjugate pair comprising a dense Fe-rich liquid and a buoyant Si-ri...

Back to Top