Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Compatibilization of Two Immiscible Homopolymers

View through CrossRef
More often than not, the mechanical properties (e.g., impact and tensile properties) of immiscible polymer blends are very poor owing to the lack of adhesion between the constituent components, which originates from strong repulsive thermodynamic (segmental) interactions. Therefore, in the past, a great deal of effort (Barlow and Paul 1984; Fayt and Teyssie 1989; Fayt et al. 1981, 1987, 1989; Gupta and Purwar 1985; Ouhadi et al. 1986a; Park et al. 1992; Schwarz et al. 1988, 1989; Srinivasan and Gupta 1994; Traugott et al. 1983) has been made to improve the mechanical properties of two immiscible polymers by adding a third component (e.g., a block copolymer). In this chapter, we confine our attention primarily to the situations where a nonreactive third component is added to two immiscible homopolymers in order to improve their mechanical properties. A polymer blend consisting of two immiscible homopolymers (say, A and B) has a very narrow interface, as schematically shown in Figure 4.1, because they have strong repulsive segmental interactions giving rise to a positive value of the Flory–Huggins interaction parameter (χ), i.e., χAB > 0. Helfand and Tagami (1971, 1972) derived the following expression relating the interfacial thickness d of a pair of immiscible homopolymers of infinite molecular weight to χ: . . . d = 2b/(6χ)1/2 (4.1). . . where the Kuhn length b is assumed to be the same for both components. They also derived an expression for the interfacial tension γ between two immiscible homopolymers: . . . γ = (χ/6)1/2bρokBT . . . in terms of χ, where kB is the Boltzmann constant, T is the absolute temperature, and ρo is the reference density (the inverse of monomeric volume of a reference component). Equation (4.1) indicates that the interfacial thickness between two immiscible homopolymers will be larger when the extent of repulsive segmental interactions is less, and Eq. (4.2) indicates that the interfacial tension between two immiscible homopolymers will be lower when the extent of repulsive segmental interactions is less.
Title: Compatibilization of Two Immiscible Homopolymers
Description:
More often than not, the mechanical properties (e.
g.
, impact and tensile properties) of immiscible polymer blends are very poor owing to the lack of adhesion between the constituent components, which originates from strong repulsive thermodynamic (segmental) interactions.
Therefore, in the past, a great deal of effort (Barlow and Paul 1984; Fayt and Teyssie 1989; Fayt et al.
1981, 1987, 1989; Gupta and Purwar 1985; Ouhadi et al.
1986a; Park et al.
1992; Schwarz et al.
1988, 1989; Srinivasan and Gupta 1994; Traugott et al.
1983) has been made to improve the mechanical properties of two immiscible polymers by adding a third component (e.
g.
, a block copolymer).
In this chapter, we confine our attention primarily to the situations where a nonreactive third component is added to two immiscible homopolymers in order to improve their mechanical properties.
A polymer blend consisting of two immiscible homopolymers (say, A and B) has a very narrow interface, as schematically shown in Figure 4.
1, because they have strong repulsive segmental interactions giving rise to a positive value of the Flory–Huggins interaction parameter (χ), i.
e.
, χAB > 0.
Helfand and Tagami (1971, 1972) derived the following expression relating the interfacial thickness d of a pair of immiscible homopolymers of infinite molecular weight to χ: .
.
.
d = 2b/(6χ)1/2 (4.
1).
.
.
where the Kuhn length b is assumed to be the same for both components.
They also derived an expression for the interfacial tension γ between two immiscible homopolymers: .
.
.
γ = (χ/6)1/2bρokBT .
.
.
in terms of χ, where kB is the Boltzmann constant, T is the absolute temperature, and ρo is the reference density (the inverse of monomeric volume of a reference component).
Equation (4.
1) indicates that the interfacial thickness between two immiscible homopolymers will be larger when the extent of repulsive segmental interactions is less, and Eq.
(4.
2) indicates that the interfacial tension between two immiscible homopolymers will be lower when the extent of repulsive segmental interactions is less.

Related Results

Lattice Boltzmann simulation of immiscible displacement in the complex micro-channel
Lattice Boltzmann simulation of immiscible displacement in the complex micro-channel
The immiscible displacement process in micro-channel, which widely existes in daily life and industrial production, is an important research subject. This subject is a typical cont...
Comprehensive Review of Worldwide CO2 Immiscible Flooding
Comprehensive Review of Worldwide CO2 Immiscible Flooding
Abstract Carbon dioxide (CO2) flooding is a mature technology in oil industry, which finds broad attention in oil production during tertiary oil recovery (EOR). Afte...
PERMEABILITY OF AIR AND IMMISCIBLE ORGANIC LIQUIDS IN POROUS MEDIA1
PERMEABILITY OF AIR AND IMMISCIBLE ORGANIC LIQUIDS IN POROUS MEDIA1
ABSTRACT: The conductivity of air, mineral oil (relative viscosity 77), and a light nontoxic oil (relative viscosity 4.7) was measured in three porous media: a sand, loamy sand, a...
The Effect of End Group Modification on the Transparency of Vinyl Addition Norbornene Polymers at 193 nm
The Effect of End Group Modification on the Transparency of Vinyl Addition Norbornene Polymers at 193 nm
AbstractSummary: Homopolymers of a bis‐trifluorocarbinol substituted norbornene (1) (α,α‐bis(trifluoromethyl)bicyclo[2.2.1]hept‐5‐ene‐2‐ethanol or HFANB) and copolymers of 1 with t...
Capillary Pressure During Immiscible Displacement
Capillary Pressure During Immiscible Displacement
Abstract Experiments performed on immiscible displacement of heptanes and mineral oil by water in capillary tubing showed that capillary pressure during drainage ...
Water-Alternating-Gas Pilot in the Largest Oil Field in Argentina: Chihuido de la Sierra Negra, Neuquen Basin
Water-Alternating-Gas Pilot in the Largest Oil Field in Argentina: Chihuido de la Sierra Negra, Neuquen Basin
Abstract Two field pilot tests of immiscible water-alternating gas (WAG) injection are being conducted in Chihuido de la Sierra Negra, the largest oilfield in Argent...
Reactive compatibilization of blends of PET and PP modified by GMA grafting
Reactive compatibilization of blends of PET and PP modified by GMA grafting
AbstractThe melt radical grafting of glycidyl methacrylate (GMA) onto isotactic polypropylene (PP) was carried out in Brabender internal mixer and the influence of reaction procedu...

Back to Top