Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Campesino hunting and conservation in Latin America

View through CrossRef
Abstract Hunting presents a paradox for biodiversity conservation. It is both a problem and a solution to species declines and poverty. Yet, conservation scientists hold different assumptions about the significance and sustainability of hunting based on the cultures and identities of hunters. In Latin America, conservationists largely sort hunters as either indigenous or campesino . Indigenous hunters are often characterized as culturally driven stewards of wildlife sustainability. Campesino hunters, by contrast, are described as peasants—cultureless, uneducated, and uncaring toward wildlife sustainability. Although such ethnically fueled hunting discourse promotes hunting research, campesino hunters remain underrepresented in most comparative hunting reviews. Moreover, there are no targeted syntheses on the current state of knowledge about campesino hunting, nothing to guide conservation research and practice with and for the largest group of hunters in Latin America. We reviewed 334 articles published from 1937 to 2018 in English (55%) and Spanish (45%)—mostly published in 145 peer‐reviewed journals—on the meanings, motivations, and sustainability of campesino hunting in Latin America. Although studies spanned 17 countries, 7 ecosystems, and >75 indigenous and nonindigenous demographics in 30 research contexts, they predominantly focused on nonindigenous campesinos for species‐specific conservation and protected area management in tropical broadleaf forests of Mexico, Peru, and Colombia. Authors used 12 methods to collect campesino hunting data, primarily interviews, surveys, and questionnaires, and drew from 10 local and traditional knowledge themes about wildlife trends and uses. Eighteen drivers, 14 constraints, and 10 conflicts—mainly subsistence, income, ethics, regulations, and crop or livestock protection—shaped whether campesino hunters pursued 799 species, 70% of which were least concern species. Yet, only 25 studies (8%) empirically assessed sustainability. Our results show the need for increased interdisciplinary and geographic engagement with campesino hunting across Latin America.
Title: Campesino hunting and conservation in Latin America
Description:
Abstract Hunting presents a paradox for biodiversity conservation.
It is both a problem and a solution to species declines and poverty.
Yet, conservation scientists hold different assumptions about the significance and sustainability of hunting based on the cultures and identities of hunters.
In Latin America, conservationists largely sort hunters as either indigenous or campesino .
Indigenous hunters are often characterized as culturally driven stewards of wildlife sustainability.
Campesino hunters, by contrast, are described as peasants—cultureless, uneducated, and uncaring toward wildlife sustainability.
Although such ethnically fueled hunting discourse promotes hunting research, campesino hunters remain underrepresented in most comparative hunting reviews.
Moreover, there are no targeted syntheses on the current state of knowledge about campesino hunting, nothing to guide conservation research and practice with and for the largest group of hunters in Latin America.
We reviewed 334 articles published from 1937 to 2018 in English (55%) and Spanish (45%)—mostly published in 145 peer‐reviewed journals—on the meanings, motivations, and sustainability of campesino hunting in Latin America.
Although studies spanned 17 countries, 7 ecosystems, and >75 indigenous and nonindigenous demographics in 30 research contexts, they predominantly focused on nonindigenous campesinos for species‐specific conservation and protected area management in tropical broadleaf forests of Mexico, Peru, and Colombia.
Authors used 12 methods to collect campesino hunting data, primarily interviews, surveys, and questionnaires, and drew from 10 local and traditional knowledge themes about wildlife trends and uses.
Eighteen drivers, 14 constraints, and 10 conflicts—mainly subsistence, income, ethics, regulations, and crop or livestock protection—shaped whether campesino hunters pursued 799 species, 70% of which were least concern species.
Yet, only 25 studies (8%) empirically assessed sustainability.
Our results show the need for increased interdisciplinary and geographic engagement with campesino hunting across Latin America.

Related Results

Types of Hunting in Medieval Georgia
Types of Hunting in Medieval Georgia
In medieval Georgia, hunting was regulated by the state. The planning of a hunting session called ‘hunting campaign’ was overseen by a board of the military department. In contrast...
Trophy Value as a Driver of Sustainable Game Management and Hunting Tourism in Croatia
Trophy Value as a Driver of Sustainable Game Management and Hunting Tourism in Croatia
Analysis of game management and trophy game populations in Osijek-Baranja County shows that this region is one of the most valuable hunting areas in Croatia, with rich populations ...
Study of russian hunting vocabulary: historical aspect
Study of russian hunting vocabulary: historical aspect
Russian hunting vocabulary is special words and expressions used by hunters to refer to hunting realities. Such words and expressions are called special or professional vocabulary,...
Editorial Note
Editorial Note
The image on the cover of this second issue of JOLCEL shows a detail from the so-called Franks Casket, an early eight-century Anglo-Saxon chest made out of whale’s bone, possibly d...
Intense Hunting Pressure Drives Roost Use in the Egyptian Fruit Bat: Conservation and One Health Implications
Intense Hunting Pressure Drives Roost Use in the Egyptian Fruit Bat: Conservation and One Health Implications
ABSTRACT Overexploitation is a leading cause of global species extinction. At the population level, intense hunting reduces populations and c...

Back to Top