Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

The Bronze Fragments of the Acropolis: II

View through CrossRef
To any student of early Greek bronze ornament the works of Dr. Furtwaengler on the Olympian bronzes must be well known, and as he has dealt at length with the development of patterns on bronzes, and as every day fresh evidence seems to be coming up which serves to confirm his views, there is no necessity for me here to do anything more than recount shortly the general characteristics and nature of this class of bronzes from the Acropolis. These, like those of Olympia, may be divided into two main classes according as they belong to the geometric or the oriental style; while a cross distinction may also be drawn between engraved or stamped ornament and relief. Originally however these two distinctions seem to have been one and the same, the geometric corresponding to the engraved or stamped technique, and the oriental generally to the relief; but later we find each of these forms of ornament translated into the other technique. The original distinction however is due to two main causes, the quality of the bronze used in the two factories and the nature of the objects principally produced in them. The bronze of geometric ornament is much harder and more brittle than that of oriental, which is soft but very tough: to work geometric bronze into repoussé relief would be almost impossible, while the finer quality of the oriental is peculiarly suitable to such a technique. Thus it is often possible simply from the feel of a bronze fragment to decide which factory it came from.
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Title: The Bronze Fragments of the Acropolis: II
Description:
To any student of early Greek bronze ornament the works of Dr.
Furtwaengler on the Olympian bronzes must be well known, and as he has dealt at length with the development of patterns on bronzes, and as every day fresh evidence seems to be coming up which serves to confirm his views, there is no necessity for me here to do anything more than recount shortly the general characteristics and nature of this class of bronzes from the Acropolis.
These, like those of Olympia, may be divided into two main classes according as they belong to the geometric or the oriental style; while a cross distinction may also be drawn between engraved or stamped ornament and relief.
Originally however these two distinctions seem to have been one and the same, the geometric corresponding to the engraved or stamped technique, and the oriental generally to the relief; but later we find each of these forms of ornament translated into the other technique.
The original distinction however is due to two main causes, the quality of the bronze used in the two factories and the nature of the objects principally produced in them.
The bronze of geometric ornament is much harder and more brittle than that of oriental, which is soft but very tough: to work geometric bronze into repoussé relief would be almost impossible, while the finer quality of the oriental is peculiarly suitable to such a technique.
Thus it is often possible simply from the feel of a bronze fragment to decide which factory it came from.

Related Results

Le Corbusier between sketches. A graphic analysis of the Acropolis sketches
Le Corbusier between sketches. A graphic analysis of the Acropolis sketches
Abstract: In contrast to Le Corbusier's later written accounts and the opinions critics have formed from these texts, this article concentrates on the ideas and opinions Le Corbusi...
Flodfund - Bronzealderdeponeringer fra Gudenåen
Flodfund - Bronzealderdeponeringer fra Gudenåen
River findsBronze Age metalwork from the river GudenåBronze Age metalwork (primarily swords and other weapons) found in European rivers has aroused interest for many years, but lit...
Bacillus subtilis bacteriophages SP82, SPO1, and phie: a comparison of DNAs and of peptides synthesized during infection
Bacillus subtilis bacteriophages SP82, SPO1, and phie: a comparison of DNAs and of peptides synthesized during infection
The genomes of Bacillus subtilis phages phie, SPO1, and SP82 were compared by DNA-DNA hybridization, analysis of DNA fragments produced by digestion with restriction endonucleases,...
Kolos rodyjski: gdzie stał i jak był wykonany
Kolos rodyjski: gdzie stał i jak był wykonany
Colossus of Rhodes: Where It Stood and How It Was Made The author, just as Ursula Vedder, who has expressed the same opinion recently, has been long sure that the place where the C...
Produire des lames de hache en dolérite au Néolithique en Mayenne. La carrière-atelier de Beulin à Saint-Germain-le-Guillaume
Produire des lames de hache en dolérite au Néolithique en Mayenne. La carrière-atelier de Beulin à Saint-Germain-le-Guillaume
Wishing to emulate the advances made by their British colleagues (Stone Axe Studies), during the 1960s P.-R. Giot and J. Cogné worked to identify the main sources of the rocks used...
The Bronze Fragments of the Acropolis
The Bronze Fragments of the Acropolis
It is a misfortune almost necessarily incidental to the excavation of any site so rich in ancient remains as the Acropolis at Athens, that smaller objects and such as have a less o...
The Acropolis and its new museum
The Acropolis and its new museum
The new Acropolis Museum was opened in June 2009 with worldwide fanfare. For this was for the Athenian acropolis – the Acropolis. After two lower galleries, visitors reach the top ...
The Archaic Acropolis: Some Problems
The Archaic Acropolis: Some Problems
The literature on the Acropolis seems to me as untidy as the site itself. Every discovery that could, on the present evidence, be made about its history, every truth that could be ...

Back to Top