Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

The Bronze Fragments of the Acropolis: II

View through CrossRef
To any student of early Greek bronze ornament the works of Dr. Furtwaengler on the Olympian bronzes must be well known, and as he has dealt at length with the development of patterns on bronzes, and as every day fresh evidence seems to be coming up which serves to confirm his views, there is no necessity for me here to do anything more than recount shortly the general characteristics and nature of this class of bronzes from the Acropolis. These, like those of Olympia, may be divided into two main classes according as they belong to the geometric or the oriental style; while a cross distinction may also be drawn between engraved or stamped ornament and relief. Originally however these two distinctions seem to have been one and the same, the geometric corresponding to the engraved or stamped technique, and the oriental generally to the relief; but later we find each of these forms of ornament translated into the other technique. The original distinction however is due to two main causes, the quality of the bronze used in the two factories and the nature of the objects principally produced in them. The bronze of geometric ornament is much harder and more brittle than that of oriental, which is soft but very tough: to work geometric bronze into repoussé relief would be almost impossible, while the finer quality of the oriental is peculiarly suitable to such a technique. Thus it is often possible simply from the feel of a bronze fragment to decide which factory it came from.
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Title: The Bronze Fragments of the Acropolis: II
Description:
To any student of early Greek bronze ornament the works of Dr.
Furtwaengler on the Olympian bronzes must be well known, and as he has dealt at length with the development of patterns on bronzes, and as every day fresh evidence seems to be coming up which serves to confirm his views, there is no necessity for me here to do anything more than recount shortly the general characteristics and nature of this class of bronzes from the Acropolis.
These, like those of Olympia, may be divided into two main classes according as they belong to the geometric or the oriental style; while a cross distinction may also be drawn between engraved or stamped ornament and relief.
Originally however these two distinctions seem to have been one and the same, the geometric corresponding to the engraved or stamped technique, and the oriental generally to the relief; but later we find each of these forms of ornament translated into the other technique.
The original distinction however is due to two main causes, the quality of the bronze used in the two factories and the nature of the objects principally produced in them.
The bronze of geometric ornament is much harder and more brittle than that of oriental, which is soft but very tough: to work geometric bronze into repoussé relief would be almost impossible, while the finer quality of the oriental is peculiarly suitable to such a technique.
Thus it is often possible simply from the feel of a bronze fragment to decide which factory it came from.

Related Results

The Bronze Fragments of the Acropolis
The Bronze Fragments of the Acropolis
It is a misfortune almost necessarily incidental to the excavation of any site so rich in ancient remains as the Acropolis at Athens, that smaller objects and such as have a less o...
The Acropolis and its new museum
The Acropolis and its new museum
The new Acropolis Museum was opened in June 2009 with worldwide fanfare. For this was for the Athenian acropolis – the Acropolis. After two lower galleries, visitors reach the top ...
The Archaic Acropolis: Some Problems
The Archaic Acropolis: Some Problems
The literature on the Acropolis seems to me as untidy as the site itself. Every discovery that could, on the present evidence, be made about its history, every truth that could be ...
Votive Reliefs in the Acropolis Museum
Votive Reliefs in the Acropolis Museum
The Terra-cotta reliefs which form the subject of the present article have been for some years one of the minor attractions of the Acropolis Museum, and I am indebted for permissio...
The Acropolis and Persepolis
The Acropolis and Persepolis
Two of the greatest monuments of the ancient world date from the fifth century B.C. and they embody respectively the ideals of the Persian and of the Athenian Empire. There had bee...
Behold the raking geison: the new Acropolis Museum and its context-free archaeologies
Behold the raking geison: the new Acropolis Museum and its context-free archaeologies
In December 1834 Athens became the capital city of the newly founded Hellenic Kingdom. King Otto, the Bavarian prince whose political and cultural initiative shaped much of what mo...
Saleroom Fiction versus Provenance
Saleroom Fiction versus Provenance
Abstract This article examines a group of twelve fragments in different languages and different scripts previously held in the Schøyen collection in London and Oslo. After they...
Karl Friedrich Schinkel's Project for a Royal Palace on the Acropolis
Karl Friedrich Schinkel's Project for a Royal Palace on the Acropolis
Schinkel's project for a palace on the Athenian Acropolis was designed for Otto von Wittelsbach, who had been elected King of Greece in 1832. Friedrich Wilhelm, Crown Prince of Pru...

Back to Top