Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

COMPARISON OF WOUND INFECTION AFTER PILONIDAL SINUS EXCISION WITH PRIMARY REPAIR VERSUS FLAP COVERAGE: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL

View through CrossRef
Background: Pilonidal sinus disease (PSD) is a chronic inflammatory condition affecting the sacrococcygeal region, often seen in young adults. Its management poses a surgical dilemma due to varied treatment options and recurrence risks. Primary midline closure is widely practiced due to procedural simplicity, but it is frequently associated with higher complication rates. Flap techniques offer an alternative with potential benefits in wound healing and infection control. This study compares the clinical efficacy and recovery outcomes of Primary Repair and Flap Coverage techniques in PSD excision. Objective: To evaluate and compare the postoperative outcomes, wound healing patterns, and infection severity between Primary Repair and Flap Repair techniques in pilonidal sinus surgery. Methods: A randomized controlled trial was conducted involving 70 patients diagnosed with PSD, divided equally into Primary Repair (n=35) and Flap Repair (n=35) groups. Patient demographics including age, sex, BMI, smoking status, and previous abscess history were recorded. Postoperative parameters—hospital stay, wound healing duration, and wound condition—were assessed using the Surgical Wound Assessment and Analysis (SWAA) scale. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 25. Statistical significance was set at p<0.05. Results: The Primary Repair group had a shorter mean hospital stay (3.31 ± 1.06 days) compared to the Flap Repair group (3.74 ± 1.55 days). Mean wound healing duration was also faster in the Primary Repair group (23.66 ± 20.88 days) versus Flap Repair (30.26 ± 14.33 days). However, the SWAA score indicated more favorable wound outcomes in the Flap group (0.74 ± 1.25) compared to Primary Repair (1.14 ± 1.57; p = 0.03). Smoking prevalence was higher in the Primary Repair group (20.0% vs. 11.4%). Conclusion: Primary Repair provides a faster recovery with shorter hospitalization, while Flap Repair results in superior wound healing quality. Personalized surgical planning based on patient risk profiles is essential to optimize treatment outcomes for pilonidal sinus disease.
Title: COMPARISON OF WOUND INFECTION AFTER PILONIDAL SINUS EXCISION WITH PRIMARY REPAIR VERSUS FLAP COVERAGE: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
Description:
Background: Pilonidal sinus disease (PSD) is a chronic inflammatory condition affecting the sacrococcygeal region, often seen in young adults.
Its management poses a surgical dilemma due to varied treatment options and recurrence risks.
Primary midline closure is widely practiced due to procedural simplicity, but it is frequently associated with higher complication rates.
Flap techniques offer an alternative with potential benefits in wound healing and infection control.
This study compares the clinical efficacy and recovery outcomes of Primary Repair and Flap Coverage techniques in PSD excision.
Objective: To evaluate and compare the postoperative outcomes, wound healing patterns, and infection severity between Primary Repair and Flap Repair techniques in pilonidal sinus surgery.
Methods: A randomized controlled trial was conducted involving 70 patients diagnosed with PSD, divided equally into Primary Repair (n=35) and Flap Repair (n=35) groups.
Patient demographics including age, sex, BMI, smoking status, and previous abscess history were recorded.
Postoperative parameters—hospital stay, wound healing duration, and wound condition—were assessed using the Surgical Wound Assessment and Analysis (SWAA) scale.
Data were analyzed using SPSS version 25.
Statistical significance was set at p<0.
05.
Results: The Primary Repair group had a shorter mean hospital stay (3.
31 ± 1.
06 days) compared to the Flap Repair group (3.
74 ± 1.
55 days).
Mean wound healing duration was also faster in the Primary Repair group (23.
66 ± 20.
88 days) versus Flap Repair (30.
26 ± 14.
33 days).
However, the SWAA score indicated more favorable wound outcomes in the Flap group (0.
74 ± 1.
25) compared to Primary Repair (1.
14 ± 1.
57; p = 0.
03).
Smoking prevalence was higher in the Primary Repair group (20.
0% vs.
11.
4%).
Conclusion: Primary Repair provides a faster recovery with shorter hospitalization, while Flap Repair results in superior wound healing quality.
Personalized surgical planning based on patient risk profiles is essential to optimize treatment outcomes for pilonidal sinus disease.

Related Results

Atypical Presentations of Pilonidal Sinus Disease: A Case Series with Literature Review
Atypical Presentations of Pilonidal Sinus Disease: A Case Series with Literature Review
Abstract Introduction: Pilonidal sinus (PNS) typically arises in the sacrococcygeal region but can occasionally present in atypical locations, including the axilla, intermammary re...
Multiple Concurrent Pilonidal Sinuses: Case report and Literature review
Multiple Concurrent Pilonidal Sinuses: Case report and Literature review
Abstract Introduction: Concurrent pilonidal sinuses (PNSs) at distinct locations are extremely rare. This report highlights an exceptional case of a young female presenting with th...
Emerging Evidence of IgG4-Related Disease in Pericarditis: A Systematic Review
Emerging Evidence of IgG4-Related Disease in Pericarditis: A Systematic Review
Abstract Introduction Immunoglobulin G4-related disease (IgG4-RD) is a recently identified immune-mediated condition that is debilitating and often overlooked. While IgG4-RD has be...
Histopathological Examination and Endoscopic Sinusectomy: Is It Possible?
Histopathological Examination and Endoscopic Sinusectomy: Is It Possible?
IntroductionAlthough carcinomatous degeneration is a rare occurrence, some authors support the need for a histopathological examination after pilonidal cyst excision. Today, minima...
Day-Care Surgery for Pilonidal Sinus
Day-Care Surgery for Pilonidal Sinus
INTRODUCTION The surgical approach to symptomatic pilonidal sinus is open to debate. Many techniques have been described and no single technique fulfils all the requirements of an ...
LASER ABLATION FOR PILONIDAL DISEASE
LASER ABLATION FOR PILONIDAL DISEASE
AIM: to evaluate short-term results of pilonidal disease treatment using different methods: the excision of pilonidal sinus and fistula with open wound healing, the primary closure...
International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG)
International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG)
This section provides current contact details and a summary of recent or ongoing clinical trials being coordinated by International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG). Clinical tria...

Back to Top