Javascript must be enabled to continue!
COMPARISON OF WOUND INFECTION AFTER PILONIDAL SINUS EXCISION WITH PRIMARY REPAIR VERSUS FLAP COVERAGE: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
View through CrossRef
Background: Pilonidal sinus disease (PSD) is a chronic inflammatory condition affecting the sacrococcygeal region, often seen in young adults. Its management poses a surgical dilemma due to varied treatment options and recurrence risks. Primary midline closure is widely practiced due to procedural simplicity, but it is frequently associated with higher complication rates. Flap techniques offer an alternative with potential benefits in wound healing and infection control. This study compares the clinical efficacy and recovery outcomes of Primary Repair and Flap Coverage techniques in PSD excision.
Objective: To evaluate and compare the postoperative outcomes, wound healing patterns, and infection severity between Primary Repair and Flap Repair techniques in pilonidal sinus surgery.
Methods: A randomized controlled trial was conducted involving 70 patients diagnosed with PSD, divided equally into Primary Repair (n=35) and Flap Repair (n=35) groups. Patient demographics including age, sex, BMI, smoking status, and previous abscess history were recorded. Postoperative parameters—hospital stay, wound healing duration, and wound condition—were assessed using the Surgical Wound Assessment and Analysis (SWAA) scale. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 25. Statistical significance was set at p<0.05.
Results: The Primary Repair group had a shorter mean hospital stay (3.31 ± 1.06 days) compared to the Flap Repair group (3.74 ± 1.55 days). Mean wound healing duration was also faster in the Primary Repair group (23.66 ± 20.88 days) versus Flap Repair (30.26 ± 14.33 days). However, the SWAA score indicated more favorable wound outcomes in the Flap group (0.74 ± 1.25) compared to Primary Repair (1.14 ± 1.57; p = 0.03). Smoking prevalence was higher in the Primary Repair group (20.0% vs. 11.4%).
Conclusion: Primary Repair provides a faster recovery with shorter hospitalization, while Flap Repair results in superior wound healing quality. Personalized surgical planning based on patient risk profiles is essential to optimize treatment outcomes for pilonidal sinus disease.
Title: COMPARISON OF WOUND INFECTION AFTER PILONIDAL SINUS EXCISION WITH PRIMARY REPAIR VERSUS FLAP COVERAGE: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
Description:
Background: Pilonidal sinus disease (PSD) is a chronic inflammatory condition affecting the sacrococcygeal region, often seen in young adults.
Its management poses a surgical dilemma due to varied treatment options and recurrence risks.
Primary midline closure is widely practiced due to procedural simplicity, but it is frequently associated with higher complication rates.
Flap techniques offer an alternative with potential benefits in wound healing and infection control.
This study compares the clinical efficacy and recovery outcomes of Primary Repair and Flap Coverage techniques in PSD excision.
Objective: To evaluate and compare the postoperative outcomes, wound healing patterns, and infection severity between Primary Repair and Flap Repair techniques in pilonidal sinus surgery.
Methods: A randomized controlled trial was conducted involving 70 patients diagnosed with PSD, divided equally into Primary Repair (n=35) and Flap Repair (n=35) groups.
Patient demographics including age, sex, BMI, smoking status, and previous abscess history were recorded.
Postoperative parameters—hospital stay, wound healing duration, and wound condition—were assessed using the Surgical Wound Assessment and Analysis (SWAA) scale.
Data were analyzed using SPSS version 25.
Statistical significance was set at p<0.
05.
Results: The Primary Repair group had a shorter mean hospital stay (3.
31 ± 1.
06 days) compared to the Flap Repair group (3.
74 ± 1.
55 days).
Mean wound healing duration was also faster in the Primary Repair group (23.
66 ± 20.
88 days) versus Flap Repair (30.
26 ± 14.
33 days).
However, the SWAA score indicated more favorable wound outcomes in the Flap group (0.
74 ± 1.
25) compared to Primary Repair (1.
14 ± 1.
57; p = 0.
03).
Smoking prevalence was higher in the Primary Repair group (20.
0% vs.
11.
4%).
Conclusion: Primary Repair provides a faster recovery with shorter hospitalization, while Flap Repair results in superior wound healing quality.
Personalized surgical planning based on patient risk profiles is essential to optimize treatment outcomes for pilonidal sinus disease.
Related Results
Pediatric Pilonidal Sinus Disease: A Single-Center Cohort Study of Clinical and Surgical Outcomes
Pediatric Pilonidal Sinus Disease: A Single-Center Cohort Study of Clinical and Surgical Outcomes
Abstract
Introduction: Pilonidal sinus disease is increasingly recognized in the pediatric population, yet evidence on its clinical characteristics and surgical outcomes in childre...
Atypical Presentations of Pilonidal Sinus Disease: A Case Series with Literature Review
Atypical Presentations of Pilonidal Sinus Disease: A Case Series with Literature Review
Abstract
Introduction: Pilonidal sinus (PNS) typically arises in the sacrococcygeal region but can occasionally present in atypical locations, including the axilla, intermammary re...
Multiple Concurrent Pilonidal Sinuses: Case report and Literature review
Multiple Concurrent Pilonidal Sinuses: Case report and Literature review
Abstract
Introduction: Concurrent pilonidal sinuses (PNSs) at distinct locations are extremely rare. This report highlights an exceptional case of a young female presenting with th...
Clinical Profile and Surgical Outcomes of Pediatric Umbilical Pilonidal Sinus
Clinical Profile and Surgical Outcomes of Pediatric Umbilical Pilonidal Sinus
Abstract
Introduction
Umbilical pilonidal sinus (UPS) is a rare form of pilonidal disease (PNS) predominantly affecting young individuals. Owing to its low incidence, data on risk ...
Safety and Efficacy of Atezolizumab in Ovarian Cancer
Safety and Efficacy of Atezolizumab in Ovarian Cancer
Abstract
Introduction
Although the efficacy of PD-L1 blockade has been evaluated in analyses that combine pharmacologically distinct antibodies, the specific efficacy and safety of...
Comparison of Outcome after Open Pilonidal Sinus Treatment Versus Endoscopic Pilonidal Sinus Treatment (EPSIT)
Comparison of Outcome after Open Pilonidal Sinus Treatment Versus Endoscopic Pilonidal Sinus Treatment (EPSIT)
Objective: To compare the complications among open pilonidal sinus treatment versus endoscopic pilonidal sinus treatment (EPSIT).
Study Design: Comparative Cross-sectional Study.
P...
CLINICAL OUTCOMES OF PRIMARY CLOSURE IN THE MANAGEMENT OF CHRONIC PILONIDAL SINUS DISEASE
CLINICAL OUTCOMES OF PRIMARY CLOSURE IN THE MANAGEMENT OF CHRONIC PILONIDAL SINUS DISEASE
Background: Chronic pilonidal sinus disease is a common inflammatory condition of the natal cleft that predominantly affects young adults and is associated with considerable morbid...
COMPARATIVE STUDY OF RHOMBOID (LIMBERG) FLAP CLOSURE WITH WIDE OPEN EXCISION IN MANAGEMENT OF PILONIDAL SINUS
COMPARATIVE STUDY OF RHOMBOID (LIMBERG) FLAP CLOSURE WITH WIDE OPEN EXCISION IN MANAGEMENT OF PILONIDAL SINUS
Objective- There are may options for the treatment of pilonidal sinus with different pros and cons . The current study intends to compare two commonly practiced surgical treatments...

