Javascript must be enabled to continue!
COMPARISON OF WOUND INFECTION AFTER PILONIDAL SINUS EXCISION WITH PRIMARY REPAIR VERSUS FLAP COVERAGE: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
View through CrossRef
Background: Pilonidal sinus disease (PSD) is a chronic inflammatory condition affecting the sacrococcygeal region, often seen in young adults. Its management poses a surgical dilemma due to varied treatment options and recurrence risks. Primary midline closure is widely practiced due to procedural simplicity, but it is frequently associated with higher complication rates. Flap techniques offer an alternative with potential benefits in wound healing and infection control. This study compares the clinical efficacy and recovery outcomes of Primary Repair and Flap Coverage techniques in PSD excision.
Objective: To evaluate and compare the postoperative outcomes, wound healing patterns, and infection severity between Primary Repair and Flap Repair techniques in pilonidal sinus surgery.
Methods: A randomized controlled trial was conducted involving 70 patients diagnosed with PSD, divided equally into Primary Repair (n=35) and Flap Repair (n=35) groups. Patient demographics including age, sex, BMI, smoking status, and previous abscess history were recorded. Postoperative parameters—hospital stay, wound healing duration, and wound condition—were assessed using the Surgical Wound Assessment and Analysis (SWAA) scale. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 25. Statistical significance was set at p<0.05.
Results: The Primary Repair group had a shorter mean hospital stay (3.31 ± 1.06 days) compared to the Flap Repair group (3.74 ± 1.55 days). Mean wound healing duration was also faster in the Primary Repair group (23.66 ± 20.88 days) versus Flap Repair (30.26 ± 14.33 days). However, the SWAA score indicated more favorable wound outcomes in the Flap group (0.74 ± 1.25) compared to Primary Repair (1.14 ± 1.57; p = 0.03). Smoking prevalence was higher in the Primary Repair group (20.0% vs. 11.4%).
Conclusion: Primary Repair provides a faster recovery with shorter hospitalization, while Flap Repair results in superior wound healing quality. Personalized surgical planning based on patient risk profiles is essential to optimize treatment outcomes for pilonidal sinus disease.
Title: COMPARISON OF WOUND INFECTION AFTER PILONIDAL SINUS EXCISION WITH PRIMARY REPAIR VERSUS FLAP COVERAGE: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
Description:
Background: Pilonidal sinus disease (PSD) is a chronic inflammatory condition affecting the sacrococcygeal region, often seen in young adults.
Its management poses a surgical dilemma due to varied treatment options and recurrence risks.
Primary midline closure is widely practiced due to procedural simplicity, but it is frequently associated with higher complication rates.
Flap techniques offer an alternative with potential benefits in wound healing and infection control.
This study compares the clinical efficacy and recovery outcomes of Primary Repair and Flap Coverage techniques in PSD excision.
Objective: To evaluate and compare the postoperative outcomes, wound healing patterns, and infection severity between Primary Repair and Flap Repair techniques in pilonidal sinus surgery.
Methods: A randomized controlled trial was conducted involving 70 patients diagnosed with PSD, divided equally into Primary Repair (n=35) and Flap Repair (n=35) groups.
Patient demographics including age, sex, BMI, smoking status, and previous abscess history were recorded.
Postoperative parameters—hospital stay, wound healing duration, and wound condition—were assessed using the Surgical Wound Assessment and Analysis (SWAA) scale.
Data were analyzed using SPSS version 25.
Statistical significance was set at p<0.
05.
Results: The Primary Repair group had a shorter mean hospital stay (3.
31 ± 1.
06 days) compared to the Flap Repair group (3.
74 ± 1.
55 days).
Mean wound healing duration was also faster in the Primary Repair group (23.
66 ± 20.
88 days) versus Flap Repair (30.
26 ± 14.
33 days).
However, the SWAA score indicated more favorable wound outcomes in the Flap group (0.
74 ± 1.
25) compared to Primary Repair (1.
14 ± 1.
57; p = 0.
03).
Smoking prevalence was higher in the Primary Repair group (20.
0% vs.
11.
4%).
Conclusion: Primary Repair provides a faster recovery with shorter hospitalization, while Flap Repair results in superior wound healing quality.
Personalized surgical planning based on patient risk profiles is essential to optimize treatment outcomes for pilonidal sinus disease.
Related Results
Multiple Concurrent Pilonidal Sinuses: Case report and Literature review
Multiple Concurrent Pilonidal Sinuses: Case report and Literature review
Abstract
Introduction: Concurrent pilonidal sinuses (PNSs) at distinct locations are extremely rare. This report highlights an exceptional case of a young female presenting with th...
Day-Care Surgery for Pilonidal Sinus
Day-Care Surgery for Pilonidal Sinus
INTRODUCTION The surgical approach to symptomatic pilonidal sinus is open to debate. Many techniques have been described and no single technique fulfils all the requirements of an ...
International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG)
International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG)
This section provides current contact details and a summary of recent or ongoing clinical trials being coordinated by International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG). Clinical tria...
Sacrococcygeal Pilonidal Sinus Disease: Evaluation of a New Classification (Singla-Mital Classification) with Management Implications: A Retrospective Study
Sacrococcygeal Pilonidal Sinus Disease: Evaluation of a New Classification (Singla-Mital Classification) with Management Implications: A Retrospective Study
Abstract
Introduction:
Minimally invasive surgery including endoscopic and laser-assisted techniques have gained populari...
Comparison of treatment of pilonidal sinus using phenol injection versus wide excision with secondary healing.
Comparison of treatment of pilonidal sinus using phenol injection versus wide excision with secondary healing.
Objective: To compare mean early post-operative pain and frequency of wound healing of pilonidal sinus using application of crystallized phenol versus wide excision with open heali...
Trial of Pilonidal Sinus Disease Induction in a Rat Model: An Animal Experimental Study
Trial of Pilonidal Sinus Disease Induction in a Rat Model: An Animal Experimental Study
Abstract
Introduction
Pilonidal sinus disease is a common suppurative perianal condition. The aim of this trial is to create an animal model of pilonidal sinus disease to study and...
Our Primary Closure Operative Technique for Pilonidal Sinus - A Recurrence-Free Procedure
Our Primary Closure Operative Technique for Pilonidal Sinus - A Recurrence-Free Procedure
Objective: The current study was done to find a method of closed operative technique for pilonidal sinus with minimum or no recurrence as the recurrence after pilonidal sinus surge...
Comparative outcome study between simple closure and flap technique in Pilonidal sinus disease
Comparative outcome study between simple closure and flap technique in Pilonidal sinus disease
Introduction: Pilonidal sinus disease (PSD) is a disease of natal cleft in sacrococcygeal region. The main goal of treatment is low recurrence rate, short hospital stays, early ret...

