Javascript must be enabled to continue!
The Damnatio Memoriae of Pope Constantine II (767–768)
View through CrossRef
The Liber Pontificalis’s account of the four-day Synod of Rome in April 769 convened by Pope Stephen III is a remarkable scene of histrionic recrimination and the condemnation of Stephen’s predecessor Pope Constantine II. At a basic level, the Synod of Rome is a dramatic instance of the politics of legitimation in action. The winning faction not only created a favourable historical record for their candidate (Stephen III) by the long-recognized process of damnatio memoriae but claimed to form ‘new rules’. How political manoeuvres become law, and how law and narrative history overlap in terms of acquiring authority, therefore, are the major preoccupations of this chapter. Further, the subsequent uncritical acceptance of the Roman Synod of 769, of its agenda, the context in which it was convened, and stance adopted, in both the Liber Pontificalis and conciliar acta, to the method by which Constantine II came to occupy the throne, have all overlooked the position of Constantine himself. He was pope for nearly thirteen months, not an ‘antipope’. This chapter explores the case of Pope Constantine II in the texts relating to the Synod of Rome as well as in the light of two extant letters from Constantine II which escaped the conflagration of his Register in Rome in 769.
Title: The Damnatio Memoriae of Pope Constantine II (767–768)
Description:
The Liber Pontificalis’s account of the four-day Synod of Rome in April 769 convened by Pope Stephen III is a remarkable scene of histrionic recrimination and the condemnation of Stephen’s predecessor Pope Constantine II.
At a basic level, the Synod of Rome is a dramatic instance of the politics of legitimation in action.
The winning faction not only created a favourable historical record for their candidate (Stephen III) by the long-recognized process of damnatio memoriae but claimed to form ‘new rules’.
How political manoeuvres become law, and how law and narrative history overlap in terms of acquiring authority, therefore, are the major preoccupations of this chapter.
Further, the subsequent uncritical acceptance of the Roman Synod of 769, of its agenda, the context in which it was convened, and stance adopted, in both the Liber Pontificalis and conciliar acta, to the method by which Constantine II came to occupy the throne, have all overlooked the position of Constantine himself.
He was pope for nearly thirteen months, not an ‘antipope’.
This chapter explores the case of Pope Constantine II in the texts relating to the Synod of Rome as well as in the light of two extant letters from Constantine II which escaped the conflagration of his Register in Rome in 769.
Related Results
Texts and Commentaries
Texts and Commentaries
The Roman Martyrs contains translations (with individual introductions and commentaries) of the passiones of the following Roman martyrs (listed in approximate chronological order)...
Pope Pius XII and the Holocaust
Pope Pius XII and the Holocaust
This collaborative effort by a number of the world's leading experts on the Holocaust examines the question: how should Vatican policies during World War II be understood? Specific...
Pope Gregory IX (1227-1241):
Power and Authority
Pope Gregory IX (1227-1241):
Power and Authority
As Cardinal Hugo and as pope, Gregory was one of the dominant figures in the history of the papacy of the High Middle Ages. Coming to prominence under Pope Innocent III, Hugo playe...
Jurisdiction
Jurisdiction
Chapter 7 investigates the multiple ways arguers can question the legitimacy of an interpretation, thereby entering the stasis of jurisdiction. There are two main points of content...
Prospero’s Tools
Prospero’s Tools
Chapter 1 considers the circumstances underpinning Pope Benedict XIV’s patronage of anatomy and anatomical modelling in Bologna and antiquarian display in Rome. It situates the pop...
1. What was Byzantium?
1. What was Byzantium?
‘What was Byzantium?’ explains the creation of the Christian Empire that ruled for over a thousand years from the great city of Constantinople. It describes the evolution of the Ro...
Essential Humphrey Bogart
Essential Humphrey Bogart
Many film fans consider Humphrey Bogart the ultimate star of Hollywood’s golden era. He rose from supporting roles in the early 1930s to become a superstar by the end of the decade...


