Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Male Infertility and the Subsequent Risk of Cancer

View through CrossRef
ObjectivesThe primary objective of this systemic review and meta-analysis was to investigate the risk of developing composite outcome of all cancers, regardless of the type of cancer among men with infertility diagnosis compared to fertile counterparts. The secondary objective was to compare the pooled risk of developing individual specific cancers between two groups.MethodsA systematic literature search was performed on the databases of PubMed (including Medline), Scopus, and Web of Science to retrieve observational studies published in English language from 01.01.1990 to 28. 02. 2021. They assessed cancer events in males with an infertility diagnosis compared to controls without infertility. The outcomes of interest were a composite outcome of cancers including all known cancer types, and also specific individual cancers. The fixed/random effects model was used to analyze heterogeneous and non-heterogeneous results. Publication bias was assessed using the Harbord test, Egger test, Begg test, and funnel plot. The pooled odds ratio of cancers was calculated using the DerSimonian and Laird, and inverse variance methods. Studies’ quality and risk of bias were assessed using structured standard tools.ResultsWe included eight cohort studies involving 168,327 men with the diagnosis of infertility and 2,252,806 men without it. The total number of composite outcome of cancers as well as individual cancers including prostate, testicular and melanoma were 1551, 324, 183 and 121 in the infertile men and 12164, 3875, 849, and 450 in the fertile men, respectively. The pooled OR of the composite outcome of cancers, regardless of the type of cancer, in men with infertility was 1.4 folds higher than those without infertility (pooled OR = 1.43, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.25-1.64). Meta-analysis of individual cancers including prostate, testicular and melanoma between two groups was carried out. The pooled ORs of testicular and prostate cancers in men with the diagnosis of infertility were significantly higher than controls without infertility (pooled OR = 1.91, 95% CI: 1.52-2.42 and pooled OR = 1.48, 95% CI: 1.05-2.08, respectively). Additionally, the pooled OR of melanoma in men with infertility was 1.3 folds higher than those without infertility (pooled OR = 1.31, 95% CI: 1.06-1.62).ConclusionA greater risk of cancers in men with male infertility was found suggesting that the history of male infertility might be an important risk factor for developing cancers in later life. Further well-designed long-term population-based prospective studies, considering all known cancers and their accompanying risk factors should be conducted to support our findings.
Title: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Male Infertility and the Subsequent Risk of Cancer
Description:
ObjectivesThe primary objective of this systemic review and meta-analysis was to investigate the risk of developing composite outcome of all cancers, regardless of the type of cancer among men with infertility diagnosis compared to fertile counterparts.
The secondary objective was to compare the pooled risk of developing individual specific cancers between two groups.
MethodsA systematic literature search was performed on the databases of PubMed (including Medline), Scopus, and Web of Science to retrieve observational studies published in English language from 01.
01.
1990 to 28.
02.
2021.
They assessed cancer events in males with an infertility diagnosis compared to controls without infertility.
The outcomes of interest were a composite outcome of cancers including all known cancer types, and also specific individual cancers.
The fixed/random effects model was used to analyze heterogeneous and non-heterogeneous results.
Publication bias was assessed using the Harbord test, Egger test, Begg test, and funnel plot.
The pooled odds ratio of cancers was calculated using the DerSimonian and Laird, and inverse variance methods.
Studies’ quality and risk of bias were assessed using structured standard tools.
ResultsWe included eight cohort studies involving 168,327 men with the diagnosis of infertility and 2,252,806 men without it.
The total number of composite outcome of cancers as well as individual cancers including prostate, testicular and melanoma were 1551, 324, 183 and 121 in the infertile men and 12164, 3875, 849, and 450 in the fertile men, respectively.
The pooled OR of the composite outcome of cancers, regardless of the type of cancer, in men with infertility was 1.
4 folds higher than those without infertility (pooled OR = 1.
43, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.
25-1.
64).
Meta-analysis of individual cancers including prostate, testicular and melanoma between two groups was carried out.
The pooled ORs of testicular and prostate cancers in men with the diagnosis of infertility were significantly higher than controls without infertility (pooled OR = 1.
91, 95% CI: 1.
52-2.
42 and pooled OR = 1.
48, 95% CI: 1.
05-2.
08, respectively).
Additionally, the pooled OR of melanoma in men with infertility was 1.
3 folds higher than those without infertility (pooled OR = 1.
31, 95% CI: 1.
06-1.
62).
ConclusionA greater risk of cancers in men with male infertility was found suggesting that the history of male infertility might be an important risk factor for developing cancers in later life.
Further well-designed long-term population-based prospective studies, considering all known cancers and their accompanying risk factors should be conducted to support our findings.

Related Results

Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Abstract The Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans (Guidelines) advises older adults to be as active as possible. Yet, despite the well documented benefits of physical a...
Edoxaban and Cancer-Associated Venous Thromboembolism: A Meta-analysis of Clinical Trials
Edoxaban and Cancer-Associated Venous Thromboembolism: A Meta-analysis of Clinical Trials
Abstract Introduction Cancer patients face a venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk that is up to 50 times higher compared to individuals without cancer. In 2010, direct oral anticoagul...
Breast Carcinoma within Fibroadenoma: A Systematic Review
Breast Carcinoma within Fibroadenoma: A Systematic Review
Abstract Introduction Fibroadenoma is the most common benign breast lesion; however, it carries a potential risk of malignant transformation. This systematic review provides an ove...
Small Cell Lung Cancer and Tarlatamab: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials
Small Cell Lung Cancer and Tarlatamab: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials
Abstract Introduction Tarlatamab is a Delta-like ligand 3 (DLL3) -directed bispecific T-cell engager recently approved for use in patients with advanced small cell lung cancer (SCL...
Are Cervical Ribs Indicators of Childhood Cancer? A Narrative Review
Are Cervical Ribs Indicators of Childhood Cancer? A Narrative Review
Abstract A cervical rib (CR), also known as a supernumerary or extra rib, is an additional rib that forms above the first rib, resulting from the overgrowth of the transverse proce...
[RETRACTED] Rhino XL Male Enhancement v1
[RETRACTED] Rhino XL Male Enhancement v1
[RETRACTED]Rhino XL Reviews, NY USA: Studies show that testosterone levels in males decrease constantly with growing age. There are also many other problems that males face due ...
Do evidence summaries increase health policy‐makers' use of evidence from systematic reviews? A systematic review
Do evidence summaries increase health policy‐makers' use of evidence from systematic reviews? A systematic review
This review summarizes the evidence from six randomized controlled trials that judged the effectiveness of systematic review summaries on policymakers' decision making, or the most...
Abstract OI-1: OI-1 Decoding breast cancer predisposition genes
Abstract OI-1: OI-1 Decoding breast cancer predisposition genes
Abstract Women with one or more first-degree female relatives with a history of breast cancer have a two-fold increased risk of developing breast cancer. This risk i...

Back to Top