Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Prisoners

View through CrossRef
How to deal with captured combatants is a problem as old as warfare itself. Execution, slavery, conscription, imprisonment, and even assimilation have historically all been means that societies have utilized to deal with warriors taken in arms. Some societies held prisoners for ransom, while others brought them into their societies to increase their numbers. The ancient Greek and Roman Empires both used captured foes for labor or sold prisoners into slavery. The first formal call for the humane treatment of prisoners of war (POWs) came in 1625 from the Dutch lawyer Hugo Grotius in The Laws of War and Peace. Drawing on Greek and Roman philosophy, Grotius sought to convince European nations to treat prisoners mercifully, often arguing that it was in their own interest to spare the lives of their captives, who could be used for labor or exchange. While Grotius’s appeals for a uniform code of prisoner treatment were not enacted, his work did provide the basis for later models on the treatment of POWs. Beginning in the mid-18th century, numerous attempts were made among nations to standardize protections for soldiers taken in combat. During the Seven Years’ War, the British and French established cartels to deal with the exchange of prisoners, although no formal treaty establishing rules for exchange or the treatment of prisoners was developed. The first formal treaty among nations to codify treatment of enemy prisoners was the Treaty of Amity and Commerce of 1785 between the United States and Prussia; the two nations agreed not use the infamous “prison hulks” that the British held Americans in during the War for Independence. In 1863, at the behest of President Abraham Lincoln, Francis Lieber, a professor of international law, developed a set of rules for both the Union and the Confederate forces to adhere to regarding the treatment of captured soldiers. Influenced by Lieber’s work, during the 19th and 20th centuries, European nations came together numerous times to try to develop international agreements on the treatment of enemy prisoners, most notably at Geneva in 1864, 1906, 1929, and 1949. The Geneva Accords created standard protocols for the treatment of incapacitated men in the field of battle, at sea, and in prison camps and for the protection of civilians during wartime; they remain the standard rules of war to which most of the world’s nations adhere. While this article deals mostly with the experiences of POWs, that is, armed combatants captured by an enemy force during battle, attention is also given, in some cases, to noncombatants imprisoned during wartime.
Oxford University Press
Title: Prisoners
Description:
How to deal with captured combatants is a problem as old as warfare itself.
Execution, slavery, conscription, imprisonment, and even assimilation have historically all been means that societies have utilized to deal with warriors taken in arms.
Some societies held prisoners for ransom, while others brought them into their societies to increase their numbers.
The ancient Greek and Roman Empires both used captured foes for labor or sold prisoners into slavery.
The first formal call for the humane treatment of prisoners of war (POWs) came in 1625 from the Dutch lawyer Hugo Grotius in The Laws of War and Peace.
Drawing on Greek and Roman philosophy, Grotius sought to convince European nations to treat prisoners mercifully, often arguing that it was in their own interest to spare the lives of their captives, who could be used for labor or exchange.
While Grotius’s appeals for a uniform code of prisoner treatment were not enacted, his work did provide the basis for later models on the treatment of POWs.
Beginning in the mid-18th century, numerous attempts were made among nations to standardize protections for soldiers taken in combat.
During the Seven Years’ War, the British and French established cartels to deal with the exchange of prisoners, although no formal treaty establishing rules for exchange or the treatment of prisoners was developed.
The first formal treaty among nations to codify treatment of enemy prisoners was the Treaty of Amity and Commerce of 1785 between the United States and Prussia; the two nations agreed not use the infamous “prison hulks” that the British held Americans in during the War for Independence.
In 1863, at the behest of President Abraham Lincoln, Francis Lieber, a professor of international law, developed a set of rules for both the Union and the Confederate forces to adhere to regarding the treatment of captured soldiers.
Influenced by Lieber’s work, during the 19th and 20th centuries, European nations came together numerous times to try to develop international agreements on the treatment of enemy prisoners, most notably at Geneva in 1864, 1906, 1929, and 1949.
The Geneva Accords created standard protocols for the treatment of incapacitated men in the field of battle, at sea, and in prison camps and for the protection of civilians during wartime; they remain the standard rules of war to which most of the world’s nations adhere.
While this article deals mostly with the experiences of POWs, that is, armed combatants captured by an enemy force during battle, attention is also given, in some cases, to noncombatants imprisoned during wartime.

Related Results

Pregnant Prisoners in Shackles
Pregnant Prisoners in Shackles
Photo by niu niu on Unsplash ABSTRACT Shackling prisoners has been implemented as standard procedure when transporting prisoners in labor and during childbirth. This procedure ensu...
The Knowledge Transfer Process of Mor Lam Ruang Toh Klon Khon Kaen Style to Prisoners at Khon Kaen Central Prison
The Knowledge Transfer Process of Mor Lam Ruang Toh Klon Khon Kaen Style to Prisoners at Khon Kaen Central Prison
The objective of this research was to convey the art of performing Mor Lam Rueang Tor Klon Khon Kaen style, by transferring the singing and performing techniques to prisoners in Kh...
RIGHTS OF PRISONERS UNDER THE INTERNATIONAL HUMANITARIAN LAW: A CASE STUDY OF THE PALESTINIAN PRISONERS IN ISRAELI PRISON
RIGHTS OF PRISONERS UNDER THE INTERNATIONAL HUMANITARIAN LAW: A CASE STUDY OF THE PALESTINIAN PRISONERS IN ISRAELI PRISON
The Israeli occupation of Palestine has triggered several forms of Palestinian resistance, resulting in the detainment of Palestinians through Israel systematic policies which dest...
Implementation of novel and conventional outbreak control measures in managing a COVID-19 outbreak in a large UK prison
Implementation of novel and conventional outbreak control measures in managing a COVID-19 outbreak in a large UK prison
Background: SARS-CoV-2 can spread rapidly within correctional facilities. On 22nd March 2020, following identification of a confirmed COVID-19 case in a prisoner in Prison A (UK), ...
Hospitality training for prisoners
Hospitality training for prisoners
Noting rising statistics relating to incarceration and reoffending, there has been increased attention given to analysing the delivery, effectiveness and challenges of hospitality ...
IMPLEMENTASI PERSAMAAN HAK NARAPIDANA TERHADAP PELAYANAN KESEHATAN PADA LEMBAGA PERMASYARAKATAN PROVINSI RIAU
IMPLEMENTASI PERSAMAAN HAK NARAPIDANA TERHADAP PELAYANAN KESEHATAN PADA LEMBAGA PERMASYARAKATAN PROVINSI RIAU
In essence, correctionalization is one of the manifestations of the formal institutionalization of the public's reaction to crime. The reaction of this society at first only focuse...
Female Prisoners in Sindh: A Health Analysis for Policy Makers
Female Prisoners in Sindh: A Health Analysis for Policy Makers
Unfortunately, the self-reported health status of female prisoners in Pakistan and especially in Sindh province have not been appropriately explored or documented. No doubt, the he...
Myten om fengselspinen
Myten om fengselspinen
Title: The Myth of “Prison Pain”. Summary: The pain of punishment and imprisonment has been widely discussed in prison research. In line with established penal/criminal theory and ...

Back to Top