Javascript must be enabled to continue!
The role of global health partnerships in vaccine equity: A scoping review
View through CrossRef
The emergence of global health partnerships (GHPs) towards the end of the twentieth century reflected concerns about slow progress in access to essential medicines, including vaccines. These partnerships bring together governments, private philanthropic foundations, NGOs, and international agencies. Those in the vaccine field seek to incentivise the development and manufacture of new vaccines, raise funds to pay for them and develop and support systems to deliver them to those in need. These activities became more critical during the COVID-19 pandemic, with the COVAX Facility Initiative promoting global vaccine equity. This review identifies lessons from previous experiences with GHPs. Findings contribute to understanding the emergence of GHPs, the mechanisms they leverage to support global access to vaccines, and the inherent challenges associated with their implementation. Using Arksey and O’Malley’s method, we conducted a scoping review to identify and synthesise relevant articles. We analysed data thematically to identify barriers and opportunities for success. We included 68 eligible articles of 3,215 screened. Most (65 [95%]) were discussion or review articles describing partnerships or programmes they supported, and three (5%) were commentaries. Emerging themes included policy responses (e.g., immunisation mandates), different forms of partnerships arising in vaccine innovation (e.g., product development partnerships, public-private partnerships for access), and influence on global governance decision-making processes (e.g., the rising influence of foundations, diminishing authority of WHO, lack of accountability and transparency, creation of disease silos). If global health partnerships are to maximise their contributions, they should: (1) increase transparency, especially regarding their impacts; (2) address the need for health systems strengthening; and (3) address disincentives for cooperative vaccine research and development partnerships and encourage expansion of manufacturing capacity in low and middle-income countries.
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Title: The role of global health partnerships in vaccine equity: A scoping review
Description:
The emergence of global health partnerships (GHPs) towards the end of the twentieth century reflected concerns about slow progress in access to essential medicines, including vaccines.
These partnerships bring together governments, private philanthropic foundations, NGOs, and international agencies.
Those in the vaccine field seek to incentivise the development and manufacture of new vaccines, raise funds to pay for them and develop and support systems to deliver them to those in need.
These activities became more critical during the COVID-19 pandemic, with the COVAX Facility Initiative promoting global vaccine equity.
This review identifies lessons from previous experiences with GHPs.
Findings contribute to understanding the emergence of GHPs, the mechanisms they leverage to support global access to vaccines, and the inherent challenges associated with their implementation.
Using Arksey and O’Malley’s method, we conducted a scoping review to identify and synthesise relevant articles.
We analysed data thematically to identify barriers and opportunities for success.
We included 68 eligible articles of 3,215 screened.
Most (65 [95%]) were discussion or review articles describing partnerships or programmes they supported, and three (5%) were commentaries.
Emerging themes included policy responses (e.
g.
, immunisation mandates), different forms of partnerships arising in vaccine innovation (e.
g.
, product development partnerships, public-private partnerships for access), and influence on global governance decision-making processes (e.
g.
, the rising influence of foundations, diminishing authority of WHO, lack of accountability and transparency, creation of disease silos).
If global health partnerships are to maximise their contributions, they should: (1) increase transparency, especially regarding their impacts; (2) address the need for health systems strengthening; and (3) address disincentives for cooperative vaccine research and development partnerships and encourage expansion of manufacturing capacity in low and middle-income countries.
Related Results
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Abstract
The Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans (Guidelines) advises older adults to be as active as possible. Yet, despite the well documented benefits of physical a...
Cometary Physics Laboratory: spectrophotometric experiments
Cometary Physics Laboratory: spectrophotometric experiments
<p><strong><span dir="ltr" role="presentation">1. Introduction</span></strong&...
Measles Vaccination Coverage and Protective Effectiveness in the Amhara Regional State, Ethiopia, 2019-2024
Measles Vaccination Coverage and Protective Effectiveness in the Amhara Regional State, Ethiopia, 2019-2024
Abstract
Background:
Despite the availability of an effective vaccine, measles remains a major public health problem in Ethiopi...
Reviews on interventions for health equity with a One Health focus
Reviews on interventions for health equity with a One Health focus
Abstract
Background: The One Sustainable Health for All (OSH) Forum was launched in 2021 to promote a transdisciplinary “One Health / Planetary Health” approach in line wit...
Well-being focused interventions for caregivers of children with developmental disabilities-a scoping review protocol
Well-being focused interventions for caregivers of children with developmental disabilities-a scoping review protocol
AbstractIntroductionChildren with developmental disabilities (DD) have complex health needs which imply that they will need assistance in many areas of their lives, a role usually ...
Attitudes towards COVID-19 vaccination, vaccine hesitancy and intention to take the vaccine
Attitudes towards COVID-19 vaccination, vaccine hesitancy and intention to take the vaccine
Background: The pandemic is at a paradoxical stage, with vaccine roll out initiated but a significantly elevated level of infection and death. Hope for recovery lies in high equita...
The Impact of Power Dynamics on Global Health Cooperation and Health Equity during the COVID-19 Crisis: Lessons for Future Policy and Pandemic Preparedness
The Impact of Power Dynamics on Global Health Cooperation and Health Equity during the COVID-19 Crisis: Lessons for Future Policy and Pandemic Preparedness
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic is over, but its impact on global health equity remains a significant concern. The pandemic highlighted and, in some cases, exacerbated longs...
Health Equity and Health Inequity of Disabled People: A Scoping Review
Health Equity and Health Inequity of Disabled People: A Scoping Review
Health equity is an important aspect of wellbeing and is impacted by many social determinants. The UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) is a testament to...

